Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Ranking Heavy FBBs

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109005

  • ant1937
  • ant1937's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 459
  • Thank you received: 6
Gina Davis, Colette Nelson, Amber Deluca, Sharon Marvel. I could care less what judges think. Those are 4 big girls that pop right into my mind. :)
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: antidoublestandard

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109006

  • chris10000
  • chris10000's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 521
  • Thank you received: 45
antidoublestandard wrote:
Is this by IFBB standards? I just checked their website and it clearly says over 57kg which is 125lbs if I know my measurements correctly.
thats the amateur ifbb standard...with lightweights , middleweights, and heavy....
at pro (if there were classes) they had only light_ and heavyweight and the limit was 59 kg
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: antidoublestandard

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109007

  • chris10000
  • chris10000's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 521
  • Thank you received: 45
ant1937 wrote:
Colette Nelson,

colette nelson ? ? ...come on ....on stage she was half the size of the bigger girls....yes, offseason she is big, but i dont think fat counts here
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109010

  • khuddle
  • khuddle's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 632
  • Thank you received: 22
And Sharon Marvel was a towering 5'3. I know, I know, she got seriously
big during her career (particularly during the off-season), but put her
next to Tina Lockwood, Lora Ottenad, Cornelia Brandt and Nina Loebert in their
prime and she would have been laughed off-stage.
Who are we going to be calling a heavyweight next? Barbara Fletcher?
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109011

khuddle wrote:
And Sharon Marvel was a towering 5'3. I know, I know, she got seriously
big during her career (particularly during the off-season), but put her
next to Tina Lockwood, Lora Ottenad, Cornelia Brandt and Nina Loebert in their
prime and she would have been laughed off-stage.
Who are we going to be calling a heavyweight next? Barbara Fletcher?
Why did they get rid of the heavyweight and lightweight at the Olympia and Ms. International anyway?

Lora Ottenad is huge!

Other heavyweights fbbs for me are Iris Kyle, Kim Chizevsky in her prime, Geraldine Morgan, sheila bleck, and a few others.
Congratulations Iris Kyle on your 9th Ms. Olympia win!

2001 (heavyweight)
2004 (heavyweight and overall)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: antidoublestandard

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109015

  • ant1937
  • ant1937's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 459
  • Thank you received: 6
I was talking off season Chris. It is true that she or Sharon Marvel were not the 200 pound level off season or on the heavier side of the HW division. I could care less about judging. I'm talking overall appeal. Sharon and Collette can be my little HW's and Amber D and Gina D my bigger ones. I like almost all of the big girls though. Those are my faves based on appeal to me personally. Judging in the sport sucks. You know that.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109017

  • ant1937
  • ant1937's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 459
  • Thank you received: 6
Not sure Sharon at her biggest would be laughed off by standing next to Laura Ottenad....whom I also liked. Yes, the shorter girls have a max size they will get to. Sharon was about 5-3. Laura was 5-7. I'm, not sure she was even as thick, let alone someone that would blow Sharon off the stage. Marvel was a monster for a year or 2. 180 offseason at the lightest. I saw her in person. She was super thick....offseason at 180 of course.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109019

  • AlexG
  • AlexG's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Administrator
  • The Last Defender of Camelot
  • Posts: 7318
  • Thank you received: 1232
Denise Rutkowski
Now there's something you don't see everyday. ~ Deep Rising (1998)

I like a good story well told.
That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.
Mark Twain / Samuel L. Clemens (1907)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109024

  • chris10000
  • chris10000's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 521
  • Thank you received: 45
ant1937 wrote:
I was talking off season Chris.

are we talking muscles or are we talking about fat ? ?

if you want a big fat woman, the country is full of them , they dwarf every fbb....200 lbs ?...at our fat girls 300 pounds is average
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109025

  • chris10000
  • chris10000's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 521
  • Thank you received: 45
ant1937 wrote:
Not sure Sharon at her biggest would be laughed off by standing next to Laura Ottenad....whom I also liked. Yes, the shorter girls have a max size they will get to. Sharon was about 5-3. Laura was 5-7. I'm, not sure she was even as thick, let alone someone that would blow Sharon off the stage. Marvel was a monster for a year or 2. 180 offseason at the lightest. I saw her in person. She was super thick....offseason at 180 of course.

sharon marvel had some good muscles on stage, but offseason she was ugly FAT ! ....
i think you dont see the difference between muscle and fat...but its easy , fat cant get flexed, fat isnt ripped, if you cant see the muscle fibers fat is covering them
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109027

  • ant1937
  • ant1937's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 459
  • Thank you received: 6
I know the difference. I like the women with their water weight. I never though Sharon was fat. I don't like the way girls look for contests all dehydrated and their faces look awful. They don't even like it.

Not a big contest guy. Don't like the fake tans or the dehydration. Maybe that is why the offseason girls often have more popular shoots than the contest look. Gina Davis was a perfect example. Almost everyone liked her offseason look better than when she was all cut up.

To each his own though. Peace bro.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Re: Ranking Heavy FBBs 2 years 3 months ago #109028

  • ant1937
  • ant1937's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 459
  • Thank you received: 6
I have a different opinion of Colette and Sharon after meeting them. I would not compare either with an average fat 200 or 300 pound woman. Not sure when you saw them looking that bad. I'm not into fat girls unless they have lots of power to go with it. Most of the strongest women in weightlifting do in fact carry some fat.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Time to create page: 0.764 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum