To be honest, I felt really let down when I found out how prevalent steroids were in female bodybuilding. Part of what first fascinated me about the sport was that it proved that it was possible for certain genetically gifted women to become more muscular than the average man, making them almost super-women. Now I find myself wondering if it's even possible without steroids.
Probably not, the vast majority (I won't say all, there's always statical exceptions) of the women actively involved in competive/contest level physical culture are using enhancement drugs, to one degree or another. And within that group most, but not all, would fit within the category for average height and size for their sex, meaning smaller then their male counterparts. This is the “norm” for mammals, the males are typical larger and stronger then females of the same species. It how nature/evolution (or if you prefer, intelligent design - I’m not going to argue one hypothesis over the other) arrived at this solution for mammalian survival.
Even so, if you measure the Human species on a liner scale with the broad based norm at the center, you’re always going have extremes at either end - at one, naturally far smaller, and at the other, naturally far larger in size. Assuming that we concentrate only on the larger end, and within that subgroup, you’re only going to have a tiny percentage of them that are going to be curious, have an inclination for, be attracted to, physical culture - and willing to stick with it as a lifestyle.
Assuming all things remain equal, meaning that they don’t use enhancement drugs, I would assume that one of these superior Amazonian types would be larger and stronger then a typical male of normal size and development.
Of course the number of them is going to be incredibly small, a percentage of a percentage of a percentage.
Show Posts
