Amaz0ns Forum
Nov 08, 2009, 02:47 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Login with username, password and session length
News: Amaz0ns Forum is discussion board, not a file-sharing board.  Please familiarize yourself with fair use doctrine before posting any material for which you do not personally hold a copyright or an explicit license to distribute from the copyright holder.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]
  Print  
Author Topic: Johanna Dejager  (Read 9088 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
cpbell0033944
Site Superhero
********
Gender: Male
Posts: 5046


Currently crushing on Mowi.


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: Sep 08, 2008, 04:30 PM »

I promised myself I wouldn't reply to this until we'd dropped this stuff, but I just wanted to clarify my position.  Whilst I am a trained biologist, I am not an expert on steroids and their effects.  My opinion (based on academic learning) is as follows:

Testing for steroid abuse is fraught with difficulties.  Biology, as the study of living things, has to encompass a range or spectrum.  By this I mean that one person may have a certain level of circulating testosterone that is due solely to biology, whereas a different person with the same levels may only be able to attain that level by taking artificial testosterone-mimicking substances.  This does, indeed make it difficult for Jo or anyone else to prove their innocence, but, by the same token, it makes it unwise to accuse someone of steroid abuse without strong evidence.  In science, opinion without evidence is worthless.

Additionally, science rarely provides 100% certainty.  As a biologist, I am trained to use statistical tests to determine the probability that the result I observe is due to some effect, not pure random chance.  We work on a 95% confidence interval,which is the scientist's equivalent of "beyond reasonable doubt" in legal matters.

There is no doubt that few women could attain Jo's physique naturally.  However, there are always pieces of data, or, in this case, a person, who lies outside the normal range.  We call such data "outliers". 

(cont'd in next post) 
Logged

"When I hear women expressing a fear of weight lifting, what I am
really hearing is a fear of being powerful. The social ideal tells
women to be hungry, manageable, childlike, not demanding space."

 -- Krista Scott-Dixon, aka Mistress Krista.
cpbell0033944
Site Superhero
********
Gender: Male
Posts: 5046


Currently crushing on Mowi.


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: Sep 08, 2008, 04:41 PM »

(cont'd from previous post)

The dificulty arises when we we have to determine whether a particular piece of data is at the extreme end of the range, or is a chance event, an outlier, which we can safely discard.  To translate: even with the abilty to perform complex statistical calculations on Jo, it would be near-impossible to determine whether her physique is down to her being unusually genetically-able to build muscle naturally, or whether she represents an outlier, in other words, she is taking steroids.   

As we cannot do this, our best effort is to make a considered judgement based on the evidence we have.  In doing so, I consider it highly likely that she is natural.  My reasons for this are as follows:

1.  Her progress has been slow and steady, rather than exhibiting dramatic gains followed by stagnation as is often seen with steroid use.

2.  The risk to her reputation if found-out is high, given her anti-drugs stance.

3.  She has contested many shows in which drug-testing has been used.  Despite the weakness of such tests, simple statistics tell us that, whilst the odds of her passing one test whilst on steroids is fairly high, the odds of her passing many tests without being found-out diminishes rapidly.

4.  She displays none of the signs of steroid use, and her appearance has changed over the years only to the extent that I would expect to be due to ageing.  She has a smooth voice, clear skin, shows little or no sign of "roid jaw", nose changes, receding hairline or acne.
Logged

"When I hear women expressing a fear of weight lifting, what I am
really hearing is a fear of being powerful. The social ideal tells
women to be hungry, manageable, childlike, not demanding space."

 -- Krista Scott-Dixon, aka Mistress Krista.
greyfox
Tenderfoot
**
Posts: 23


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: Sep 08, 2008, 04:49 PM »

Look, this is getting out of hand. And I do apologize for that.

I'll sum up this entire argument with a fair and balanced perspective.

My argument, JD, as a woman, cannot produce the levels of testostrone needed to attain her muscular development. Medical Science supports this, period end of story of my arguement

Overall defense (that to me made the most sense):

1) Hold that there are very exceptional circumstances in medical science, and JD is one of these cases.--- every point that cpbell made above (which i think is the best sum of your arguement) comes down to this

I am willing to acknowledge the defense as barley plausible if you will in turn accept that that postition is indeed highly highly unlikly.

I have adressed everypoint that cp made directly (in previous posts) above except for number 1; slow and steady progress does not mean no roid use, it IMO means she didn't take incredibly intensive cycles or had a very hard time responding to the drugs (perfect exmaple= dave palumbo). If she was natural there would be a limit due to her low test levels; its just like saying your local gym rat with insane genetics can attain a Mr.O physque without the drugs, it wll just take a lot longer...
« Last Edit: Sep 08, 2008, 04:58 PM by greyfox » Logged
cpbell0033944
Site Superhero
********
Gender: Male
Posts: 5046


Currently crushing on Mowi.


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: Sep 09, 2008, 07:32 AM »

Sorry, I didn't make myself clear.  I agree that rapid improvements are not always seen in steroid use, just that they are often present because athletes use excessive cycles, and that this seems to me to be another factor in why I believe she is clean.  I accept that it is unlikely that any one FBBer will be able to grow such musculature naturally, however I argue that many women build muscles around the world and so it's quite likely that one finds that she is able to do so.
Logged

"When I hear women expressing a fear of weight lifting, what I am
really hearing is a fear of being powerful. The social ideal tells
women to be hungry, manageable, childlike, not demanding space."

 -- Krista Scott-Dixon, aka Mistress Krista.
jdfan
Site Regular
***
Posts: 48


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: Nov 12, 2008, 11:05 AM »

Check out Johanna's update on Andy's: http://www.amg-lite.com/johanna_dejager/

Best biceps shot ever:

Logged
cpbell0033944
Site Superhero
********
Gender: Male
Posts: 5046


Currently crushing on Mowi.


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: Nov 12, 2008, 04:10 PM »

Check out Johanna's update on Andy's: http://www.amg-lite.com/johanna_dejager/

Best biceps shot ever:



If I didn't know better, I'd almost say they must be morphed!  Pound-for-pound, Johanna must be the Bicep Queen!
Logged

"When I hear women expressing a fear of weight lifting, what I am
really hearing is a fear of being powerful. The social ideal tells
women to be hungry, manageable, childlike, not demanding space."

 -- Krista Scott-Dixon, aka Mistress Krista.
BlackKusanagi
Site Superhero
********
Gender: Male
Posts: 2142


Black and Blue Blazer

435293714 blackkyoex3@hotmail.com fifiemk fifiemk
View Profile WWW
« Reply #62 on: Nov 12, 2008, 07:44 PM »

Very impressive.
Logged

"The only way we can evolve, is to make sure all the trash dies first. So then the rest of us can have all the fun."
- Serena

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
RocketTheme Joomla Templates