Amaz0ns Forum
Jan 08, 2009, 09:03 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Login with username, password and session length
News: Some boards are only visible to users who are logged in and have more than 20 posts.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: A New Laura Croft  (Read 3280 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
cpbell0033944
Site Superhero
********
Gender: Male
Posts: 3934


I adore Cindy! Amanda Savell never forgotten.


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: Aug 31, 2008, 04:08 PM »

Much as I love muscular women and DCM's Tetsuko reigns supreme in the superhero genre' (or is at least in the Top 5), some characters just need to be simply strong and athletic looking. Lara Croft is one of those. Large muscles just don't work on that character.

I'm not wanting to pick an argument with you, CptMatt, but, for me, large muscles work on any character! Wink
Logged

"When I hear women expressing a fear of weight lifting, what I am
really hearing is a fear of being powerful. The social ideal tells
women to be hungry, manageable, childlike, not demanding space."

 -- Krista Scott-Dixon, aka Mistress Krista.
SheMuscleLover
Site Elder
*****
Posts: 124


Kage+no+Ryuu
View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: Sep 19, 2008, 01:44 AM »

Much as I love muscular women and DCM's Tetsuko reigns supreme in the superhero genre' (or is at least in the Top 5), some characters just need to be simply strong and athletic looking. Lara Croft is one of those. Large muscles just don't work on that character.

Reluctant as I am to do so, I gotta agree with you there.  Some characters are walking bricks, and look good with bodies that could shrug off antitank fire, while others are more the lithe and agile gymnastic types, who look best with the tight, wiry physiques best suited for their acrobatic feats.

Lara clearly falls into the latter category.  While, as the Tetsuko cosplay pic showed, Lara's iconic image can be portrayed by someone with ample musculature... it loses something in the translation, looking less like Ms. Croft herself, and more like some remarkably-similar-looking female powerhouse has spent a happy day rooting through her closets all evening while she was out on her weekend holiday.
Logged
CptMatt
Site Elder
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 188


CptMatt
View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: Sep 27, 2008, 10:15 PM »

I'm not wanting to pick an argument with you, CptMatt, but, for me, large muscles work on any character! Wink

No argument taken. To each his own in taste.  Cheesy

Its just that I know that all that muscle is incredibly powerful (and sexy) but I also know that it limits flexibility. A truly huge bodybuilder wouldn't be able to do a lot of things that Lara does.

And yes, I know its all fantasy, but I like keeping at least one of those fantastical feet in at least a little reality.  Grin

Reluctant as I am to do so, I gotta agree with you there.  Some characters are walking bricks, and look good with bodies that could shrug off antitank fire, while others are more the lithe and agile gymnastic types, who look best with the tight, wiry physiques best suited for their acrobatic feats.

Lara clearly falls into the latter category.  While, as the Tetsuko cosplay pic showed, Lara's iconic image can be portrayed by someone with ample musculature... it loses something in the translation, looking less like Ms. Croft herself, and more like some remarkably-similar-looking female powerhouse has spent a happy day rooting through her closets all evening while she was out on her weekend holiday.

Another cartoon character that is in the same mold is Erin Esurance, from the Esurance ads. The way she's drawn, in that black catsuit, is just about perfect. Especially her legs.  Shocked
Logged
Reason
Site Hero
******
Posts: 364


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: Sep 28, 2008, 03:20 AM »

I hope they haven't ruled out her playing the role of Lara Croft, obviously not in another movie, but perhaps in a TV series or webisodes or something. I just love it when they cast someone that could be their character in real life in they wanted to.
Logged
CptMatt
Site Elder
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 188


CptMatt
View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: Sep 28, 2008, 07:40 PM »

I hope they haven't ruled out her playing the role of Lara Croft, obviously not in another movie, but perhaps in a TV series or webisodes or something. I just love it when they cast someone that could be their character in real life in they wanted to.

She probably be like the ones before her, just a human body for the character for promotions. All she'll do is show up at software and gaming conventions in the Eidos booth or at other publicity dates for the company.
Logged
cpbell0033944
Site Superhero
********
Gender: Male
Posts: 3934


I adore Cindy! Amanda Savell never forgotten.


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: Oct 04, 2008, 09:32 AM »

No argument taken. To each his own in taste.  Cheesy

Its just that I know that all that muscle is incredibly powerful (and sexy) but I also know that it limits flexibility. A truly huge bodybuilder wouldn't be able to do a lot of things that Lara does.

And yes, I know its all fantasy, but I like keeping at least one of those fantastical feet in at least a little reality.  Grin

Another cartoon character that is in the same mold is Erin Esurance, from the Esurance ads. The way she's drawn, in that black catsuit, is just about perfect. Especially her legs.  Shocked

Some FBBers can be surprisingly flexible, though.  For example, Isabelle Turrell produced a full, controlled sideways leg-split during her USA08-winning performance.
Logged

"When I hear women expressing a fear of weight lifting, what I am
really hearing is a fear of being powerful. The social ideal tells
women to be hungry, manageable, childlike, not demanding space."

 -- Krista Scott-Dixon, aka Mistress Krista.
The_Collector_2
Site Superhero
********
Posts: 1214


the_collector01
View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: Oct 04, 2008, 02:19 PM »

Heh heh,

The question isn't on the ability of the bodybuilder really.  It's more about the concept...

For instance, if we use comics as an example.

I think that heroes who only shoot fireballs and eye blasts from a distance, should be rather scrawny and not as muscular compared to a hero that fights hand to hand or has super strength.  This matches the concept of the character, which means that they are weak when up close but strong at a distance.

It wouldn't make sense for Captain America to be scrawny since he's a hand to hand fighter with super strength.  Otherwise you get the "Supergirl" effect, a scrawny toothpick who can lift tanks.  Does that make much sense to you?

So when Cpt Matt is talking about some characters not being an ideal fit for muscles, it just means that some characters or people just don't look right with an enormously muscular body.  Sometimes you can just tell by looking at someone's face that they wouldn't carry muscles well.

For instance, I personally don't think Jennifer Aniston would look good with big muscles and I've seen the morphs done to give me an idea.  It just doesn't work for me, she's very attractive but she just doesn't seem the type that should have muscles.


Lara Croft, she would look great as perhaps a figure competitor with a six pack of abs, well defined back, and arms, but she wouldn't be as good being beefy and massive, otherwise you expect her to lift boulders.  Which would be fine, but it'd be a totally different character.

Muscles simply don't work for all, that's why you get some hideous "women" with muscles and you're like "Yikes..." where as other women it suits them better and they look perfect with massive size.
Logged

Female Muscle Growth Animations -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_collector01

Female Muscle Artwork -
http://tc2.deviantart.com/
cpbell0033944
Site Superhero
********
Gender: Male
Posts: 3934


I adore Cindy! Amanda Savell never forgotten.


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: Oct 04, 2008, 02:43 PM »

Heh heh,

The question isn't on the ability of the bodybuilder really.  It's more about the concept...

For instance, if we use comics as an example.

I think that heroes who only shoot fireballs and eye blasts from a distance, should be rather scrawny and not as muscular compared to a hero that fights hand to hand or has super strength.  This matches the concept of the character, which means that they are weak when up close but strong at a distance.

It wouldn't make sense for Captain America to be scrawny since he's a hand to hand fighter with super strength.  Otherwise you get the "Supergirl" effect, a scrawny toothpick who can lift tanks.  Does that make much sense to you?

So when Cpt Matt is talking about some characters not being an ideal fit for muscles, it just means that some characters or people just don't look right with an enormously muscular body.  Sometimes you can just tell by looking at someone's face that they wouldn't carry muscles well.

For instance, I personally don't think Jennifer Aniston would look good with big muscles and I've seen the morphs done to give me an idea.  It just doesn't work for me, she's very attractive but she just doesn't seem the type that should have muscles.


Lara Croft, she would look great as perhaps a figure competitor with a six pack of abs, well defined back, and arms, but she wouldn't be as good being beefy and massive, otherwise you expect her to lift boulders.  Which would be fine, but it'd be a totally different character.

Muscles simply don't work for all, that's why you get some hideous "women" with muscles and you're like "Yikes..." where as other women it suits them better and they look perfect with massive size.

Point understood. Cool
Logged

"When I hear women expressing a fear of weight lifting, what I am
really hearing is a fear of being powerful. The social ideal tells
women to be hungry, manageable, childlike, not demanding space."

 -- Krista Scott-Dixon, aka Mistress Krista.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
RocketTheme Joomla Templates