What do you like/dislike about female-power.net?

Parhaps, make it free?

It was worth a shot.

Well thanks for your input, but im afraid its kinda unrealistic, given the fact I’m one of many “connective” links that allows to route some $$ from the fans to the models, fbb’s and other muscular girls. It has to be able to cover travel and lodging expenses and also make it worthwhille for me to keep bringing the content. That’s how it works and for that it has to be a paysite.

Best regards

FlakBait wrote:

Honesty huh? Never ask for my honest opinion unless you want it 😛

Having looked at your site it would be exceptionally hard for anyone who is not a member to give you any feedback when it comes to your content.

It seems that each of your models averages two photo galleries and 3 video clips. At $12.95 per month your site isn’t that expensive but given that muscleangels is $17.95 with substantially more content and daily updates, versus your once a week, it is difficult to see why I should choose your site over something like that for an extra $5.

Remove those empty boxes from the bodybuilders gallery on the models page it looks like either you coded something wrong or the galleries disappeared on you.

At this point 3D content is nothing but a gimmick. It does not appeal to anyone outside a very small niche market right now, especially online. I think your time money and effort would be better spent producing regular content with perhaps an occasional 3D project every now and then as an added bonus instead of making it a featured site category.

Your homepage needs to be redesigned. God knows how much I hate overly flash-ed websites that throw all kinds of crap at you and change colors and backgrounds every 2.5 seconds but you need something more then what you have. At the very least some sort of window with scrolling preview content, if they are clickable to the full size previews that’s even better. Also the text in that middle paragraph fades into that womans armpit, not good when you’re trying to look like a professional content site and not something simply setup by some dude over the weekend.

Haha hey thats what i asked for and you delivered. Thanks for taking time to analyze…

However there are few things i have to relate to. Main difference is the Resolution of the photos on my site are ALOT bigger compared to any other.
So you can see them in almost full “straight from the camera” resolution.

Well i doubt theres any website able to compete with Muscle angels when a 3rd place Ms O. is the person getting in touch with models. Annie Riveccio makes it happen and she can get everywhere, backstage etc, hehe. So, no I’m not gonna compete with that in quantity departament, but i can in quality departament. And i think i am. The videos are abit larger but are ALOT more crispier. (except some of them that i tapes using smaller camcorder).

We update less often but more, 4 models a week vs 2 at MA. For now we can’t update more often simply because we need more content. My main concern was that we were concentrating on figure/fitness type too much and the website lacks more muscular models… what we all like 😛

3d, well for now we just put few pics up now and then and one clip here and there but there will be more in time. Personally i think some of those pics and vids are extremely stimulating 😀 (to me) thats why i thought some people might like it as well, especially with models like Katka or more muscular ones that we plan to feature in 3d soon, like Alina popa or Brigita Brezovac where there are big muscles to pop out in 3d hehe.

Just to be clear, I didnt write all that to start a discussion and state i disagree. I just needed to add some points to all that.

Once again thanks for taking time and writing… 🙂