- This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by cpbell0033944.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 7, 2007 at 5:00 pm #57314fbb_admirerParticipant
I can't describe how hot she is.
My God, I would do the worst job in the world for months at 2 USD/hour ;), just to spend one hour with her.
August 7, 2007 at 6:19 pm #57315fbbsare2hotParticipantDamn she's hot.
August 7, 2007 at 6:32 pm #57316cpbell0033944ParticipantThanks, gentlemen, for your words of support and agreement re the gorgeousness that is Mistress Debra.
August 10, 2007 at 11:25 pm #57317fbb_admirerParticipantI've taken some measurements on her pics, the only data I knew was her height (and some more on her website, but that was unneccesary for this). I use European metric standards, sorry.
The results:
Her shoulders are somewhere between 59-69 cm wide (mine: 47 cm)
Her back at the widest point is between 81-70 cm wide (mine: 48 cm)
Her back's height is between 70-82 cm (mine: 66 cm)Even if the lowest results are about reality, she is still much more bigger and stronger than me (and almost every human being on earth), and on top of that, she is beautiful as heaven. Incredible!
Does anyone has more data about Debra?
August 10, 2007 at 11:40 pm #57318cpbell0033944ParticipantI've taken some measurements on her pics, the only data I knew was her height (and some more on her website, but that was unneccesary for this). I use European metric standards, sorry.
The results:
Her shoulders are somewhere between 59-69 cm wide (mine: 47 cm)
Her back at the widest point is between 81-70 cm wide (mine: 48 cm)
Her back's height is between 70-82 cm (mine: 66 cm)Even if the lowest results are about reality, she is still much more bigger and stronger than me (and almost every human being on earth), and on top of that, she is beautiful as heaven. Incredible!
Does anyone has more data about Debra?
Not wishing to doubt your sterling work, but are you sure about those figures? I know she's big and seriously buffed, but, if those figures are true then she really would be one of the strongest humans on the face of the planet.
August 12, 2007 at 9:50 am #57319BigDiggy22ParticipantNiiiiiice. 🙂
August 12, 2007 at 1:32 pm #57320fbb_admirerParticipantMy calculations can't be exact, because I've done them based measurements on her pictures. This is how I made it:
I knew her height, so I looked up a picture where she is standing front side. I measured how many pixels are her height, and her head's height (from the shoulder-neck point to the top of her head). This gave me the number that her head's height should be between 21-24 cm. Then I looked up two other pictures of her back, where her head is clearly visible. Then I measured her head's height (in pixels) on these pictures, and also measured the width of her shoulders and back.
The problem is, that it's hard to exactly measure the head, but it's 95% about 21-24 cm. If the pics (I used) are not manipulated, at least my lowest estimates should be about right.
August 12, 2007 at 3:04 pm #57321cpbell0033944ParticipantMy calculations can't be exact, because I've done them based measurements on her pictures. This is how I made it:
I knew her height, so I looked up a picture where she is standing front side. I measured how many pixels are her height, and her head's height (from the shoulder-neck point to the top of her head). This gave me the number that her head's height should be between 21-24 cm. Then I looked up two other pictures of her back, where her head is clearly visible. Then I measured her head's height (in pixels) on these pictures, and also measured the width of her shoulders and back.
The problem is, that it's hard to exactly measure the head, but it's 95% about 21-24 cm. If the pics (I used) are not manipulated, at least my lowest estimates should be about right.
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure you've done it right – I just wonder whether they are manips. Whilst I'd be on cloud nine if she really was that titanically big, I can't think that she can be. Can she?! 😮 8)
August 12, 2007 at 5:36 pm #57322fbb_admirerParticipantWell, she is quite tall, and her pics of her back show how wide her back and shoulders are. I think these numbers can be true. For example, she states on her website, that her biceps are 40 cm, mines are: 32 cm. She has 25% bigger biceps, than mine. I don't know much about anatomy, but if she has such an advantage in biceps, she also can have 20% wider shoulders.
http://www.debrahaley.net/stats.html
Or just take a look at her picture with I'm sure one of the biggest man on earth, by back width, Dorian Yates:
http://www.debrahaley.net/images/Sampple10.jpg
She is almost that huge as Dorian Yates!
Anyway, all the pics I used was from her website's member section. I don't want Debra or her webmaster to suspend my membership, so I won't attach pics here, but I'll send her an email about this discussion, maybe she'll be kind enough to make those measurements on herself 🙂
If she responds, I'll post the numbers here 😉
August 12, 2007 at 10:18 pm #57323cpbell0033944ParticipantAnyway, all the pics I used was from her website's member section. I don't want Debra or her webmaster to suspend my membership, so I won't attach pics here, but I'll send her an email about this discussion, maybe she'll be kind enough to make those measurements on herself 🙂
If she responds, I'll post the numbers here 😉
I'd look-forward to that!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.