[Devon Cory]

For the most part, I'm with Hunter on this. I love huge breasts. I love huge muscles. I love it even more when they come together. But when it gets to the points where a woman can't stand up straight, or move, for that matter, it just seems so much less appealing.

Same here.

That being said, I don't mind the breasts growing to the size of a house. However, my main interest in such a scenario is the growth itself and less the breasts size.

[Chuck]

One thing I might add; I think my personal limits in what is too big have progressed over the years.

When I first started out, I thought breasts like Readyart's and muscles like SyberStyk's were too big. Now I'm rather quite fond of both lol. Anyone else have this problem? Uh… not that it's really a problem… 😀

[Lu]

Ha, yeah I know what you mean. First big boobs and actual FMG I'd draw were WAY smaller.

[Michael Pouliot]

One of the interesting things about a fetish is how easy it can be to cast a wary eye on variations that are outside your own personal norm.  When I think about what I consider to be some completely outrageous representations, I think "how can that possibly be appealing?".  But then I take a step back and look at how my own basis is far outside the norm, and I say "oh yeah…".  Thus, for questions like this, there are clearly no right or wrong answers.  Not that I feel that other posters where implying that there were absolutes…I just felt it needed saying.

Given that, functional use, as others have stated, is also my key dividing line.  Fantasy breasts can still be quite large, but they should be above the waist and still appear to be supportable.  The beach ball look is ok, but some realism is even better.

[Prophet Tenebrae]

If you hang around fetish groups look enough, I think you just get desensitised… I mean, after you've seen another hairy, hypertrophic shemale you just kind of numb yourself to such… over time, you just get more used to these things as time goes on.

[TC2]

Desensitization?  Hell yeah!

When I look at the likes of Melissa Dettwiller and Karen Zaremba I consider them "skinny" in my books.  While an average joe shmo would say "OMG IT'S THE HULK!"

Morons.

[Chuck]

So… in ten years time… we will not be satisfied until the growing woman has breasts the size of the moon and biceps the size of the earth and a six-pack you could recreate the United States of America on?

Great! Now we just need to find a woman who wants to get this big  😀

[cpbell0033944]

Desensitization?  Hell yeah!

When I look at the likes of Melissa Dettwiller and Karen Zaremba I consider them "skinny" in my books.  While an average joe shmo would say "OMG IT'S THE HULK!"

Morons.

I have EXACTLY the same problem.  My cure was a bit radical, and it might upset some here, but what I found that worked was to go to crummy "celebrity" sites and look at photos of skinny well-known women – Lohan, Duff etc.  After being shocked, saddened and deeply turned-off by the sight of women wrecking their bodies for the sake of fashion( :'(), I would then return to photos of Ms Zaremba, Ms Dettwiller, Ms Waugaman and, with the scales fallen from my eyes, I saw them in as I did when, a few months ago, I first found femuscle- that is to say as glorious, full, 3D women who are revelling in the wonder of their bodies and what they can do, instead of hating them and trying to occupy less and less space in an attempt to "2D" themselves.
Not only is it gratifying from the point of view of a femuscle lover, but it also restors the faith of this feminist-inclined guy (yes, really) that there are women out there who could provide fantastic role-models to vulnerable teenage girls if only they were seen more in the mainstream media.  If you had a 16-year-old daughter, guys, who would you prefer her to look-up to physique-wise:  Lindsay bloody Lohan or Val Waugaman? 8)

Sorry for not answering the question – for me breasts aren't particularly important – I didn't answer this question earlier in my response because there was something I wanted to say more.  Now that I've said it, I feel much better. 🙂

[Chuck]

Affirmative!

(Slightly off topic veering but we'll try to keep it all on course. Woohoo!)

Someone once said that (I don't know who) that the trends in what is desirable in the female form fluctuate from skinny to more full figured and back again, going from one extreme to the other.

Either way, I think I'd prefer my daughter's role models (if I had daughters or children at all) to be, at least physically, to be toward the more imposing figures, if at least because they don't seem hellbent on destroying themselves in idiotic lifestyle choices.

I don't want my daughter to think that she needs to lash out at the world by shaving her head and being lewd.

Plus, we're an obese society. Support of women pursuing physical fitness is always a plus  😀

Also, it does seem possible that the one extreme cannot exist without the other, which is why I suppose we (or me at least) have our ideal FMG candidates be thin waifs who suddenly explode. Sometimes we really like the changeover from one extreme to the other.

[cpbell0033944]

Strangely, I'm not even especially into FMG, lthough I can see the attraction. ;D  I'm mostly into buff women, simple as that.

[Author]

Posts