[btx]

Jed, I really dig your stuff. I love how you treat larger than life women as a legitimate subject for art and not just fetish.
You will be recognized.

BTX

[Number6]

All fine work!  I particularly like the second one (superheroine) and the fourth one (waitress), though I can't pin down why.  It could be the great muscular definition, the bare abs, or perhaps I just really like pictures of girls holding things above their heads.  ;D
At any rate, keep up the good work!

[Rock Martin]

Jed, I really dig your stuff. I love how you treat larger than life women as a legitimate subject for art and not just fetish.
You will be recognized.

BTX

What do you mean by "just fetish"?

[Yatz57]

Jed, I really dig your stuff. I love how you treat larger than life women as a legitimate subject for art and not just fetish.
You will be recognized.

BTX

Indeed. And I think I got the title for your first Time/Newsweek cover story: Paul Gauguin on steroids

BTW, I just got to know: what the hellis it that that superheroine-type girl in the second sketch is lifting?!

[Eric]

BTW, I just got to know: what the hellis it that that superheroine-type girl in the second sketch is lifting?!

Judging from the small pebbles falling from it, I think it's a large boulder…

Later,

Eric F., EnhanceMan

[Jedediah]

These are all very impressive. The second one from the top has legs that look like a Burne Hogarth anatomy study. Love the natural looking gestures. Good work all around.

Indeed. And I think I got the title for your first Time/Newsweek cover story: Paul Gauguin on steroids

BTW, I just got to know: what the hellis it that that superheroine-type girl in the second sketch is lifting?!

Judging from the small pebbles falling from it, I think it's a large boulder…

Eek!  My sources are showing!  I love Gauguin (Also Gaston Lachaise, who if you guys haven't seen his stuff, I am sure you would dig:
NSFW link: http://images.google.com/images?q=gaston%20lachaise&hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=wi ), and I was just cribbing from Hogarth because I was foggy on how the muscles go on the thigh.
Anyway, thank you all for the discerning commentary and feedback.  I like the attention to detail you guys pay, as well as the frank admissions of what sort of imagery presses your buttons.
I think the line between art and fetish is pretty blurry- see Gaston above- with art being the level of skill shown in making something, and fetish being an obsessive interest in subject matter, regardless of artistic qualities.

And the supergal is lifting a very hastily drawn boulder, I think.

[Rock Martin]

Eek!  My sources are showing!  I love Gauguin (Also Gaston Lachaise, who if you guys haven't seen his stuff, I am sure you would dig:
NSFW link: http://images.google.com/images?q=gaston%20lachaise&hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=wi ), and I was just cribbing from Hogarth because I was foggy on how the muscles go on the thigh.
Anyway, thank you all for the discerning commentary and feedback.  I like the attention to detail you guys pay, as well as the frank admissions of what sort of imagery presses your buttons.
I think the line between art and fetish is pretty blurry- see Gaston above- with art being the level of skill shown in making something, and fetish being an obsessive interest in subject matter, regardless of artistic qualities.

And the supergal is lifting a very hastily drawn boulder, I think.

Is it wrong to have muscle women as subject matter if you really like to draw them?

[Jedediah]

Is it wrong to have muscle women as subject matter if you really like to draw them?

I don't think so.

[That Guy]

8) nice  8)

[Fett]

Shit! How did I miss this? Great work! ^__^

[Author]

Posts