- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by cpbell0033944.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 30, 2007 at 7:38 pm #64046themoddestParticipant
I just made a new discovery and decided to share. Actress Amy Motta as you can plainly see from the below picture (lower right in blue top) appears to have arms easily larger than many "figure" girls.
Unfortunately that is the only pic of her showing any real muscle. Her IMDB Filmography is not that large so I'll be impressed if anyone else is able to locate any more than the pic I am posting. But by all means, try if you dare and post. 😉
themoddest
November 30, 2007 at 8:03 pm #64047themoddestParticipantI found another link worth visiting. No where near the muscle seen in the pic above, but what I would guess to be either an earlier stage of development, or (hopefully not) an atrophied state to be more "marketable". ???
If you scroll down, you will find a series of beach bikini pics which do show some small amount of muscle like so…
themoddest
November 30, 2007 at 8:43 pm #64048themoddestParticipantOk…. ummm, a little puzzled by this, but I found a link to the production of the play that the first picture shows (in other words, the same period of time). It has a video and other pics (in one giant jpg) which show her arms substantially smaller. Its like something out of the story section only not fiction this time… relaxed her arms are size "A" and tensed they are size "B"? Ummm… wow?
Go see for yourself. Be warned, if you decide to download the video, its 13 and a half minutes of a lame drum loop and insufferable drivel, so if you want, you can skip ahead to 4:00, 7:35, and 9:20. There was one other, but not worth mention. All are only tiny snippets and nothing special in terms of showing her physique. She is however a supremely attractive woman. Guess I should give you that link now huh?
themoddest
November 30, 2007 at 9:12 pm #64049cpbell0033944ParticipantTwo observations:
1. Thanks for posting – she is a very hot woman. 😉
2. Her posture in the first photo is effectively a tricep pulldown minus the pulldown, i.e. the delt and tricep are being flexed. I dont therefore think she is as buff as that photo implies; having said that, I suspect that she has the potential to be buff and would love to see her get more muscular. 8)
December 1, 2007 at 3:01 pm #64050themoddestParticipantYes, I was aware of the position she is in creating a "flexed" state. My point was that even flexed AND pumped, her arm should not be that much larger. The percentage increase in arm diameter (and in muscular display) are so extreme that I would be questioning the authenticity of the photo and insisting it is a photo manipulation if not for having found it through a reasonably reliable source such as imdb. It is not only her tricep that mushrooms to astonishing new proportions, her bicep appears to have had a distinctly fuller muscle belly while fully extended and lengthened. In the first picture, her bicep looks larger lengthened than it looks shortened as seen in other pics where her arm is bent.
December 1, 2007 at 3:37 pm #64051cpbell0033944ParticipantYes, I was aware of the position she is in creating a "flexed" state. My point was that even flexed AND pumped, her arm should not be that much larger. The percentage increase in arm diameter (and in muscular display) are so extreme that I would be questioning the authenticity of the photo and insisting it is a photo manipulation if not for having found it through a reasonably reliable source such as imdb. It is not only her tricep that mushrooms to astonishing new proportions, her bicep appears to have had a distinctly fuller muscle belly while fully extended and lengthened. In the first picture, her bicep looks larger lengthened than it looks shortened as seen in other pics where her arm is bent.
Good point. Perhaps she is like Jodi Miller in that her flex/relax difference is unusually large? Whatever, she's one to watch. 8)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.