- This topic has 22 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 4 months ago by
AlexG.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 12, 2010 at 7:42 pm #97722
GWHH
ParticipantDecember 12, 2010 at 8:07 pm #97726Dan
ParticipantAllison Stokke is buffer than your girlfriend! :laugh:
December 12, 2010 at 9:17 pm #97729massivebodybuilder
ParticipantI am a little confused about that you’re talking about.
the term “ripped” is used to describe a bodybuilder’s vascularity and/or definition. I see NO vascularity on her….at all.
I would also say she is hardly “buffed”. She’s simply toned and very fit.
December 12, 2010 at 10:49 pm #97731BodybyBane
Participantmassivebodybuilder wrote:
I am a little confused about that you’re talking about.
the term “ripped” is used to describe a bodybuilder’s vascularity and/or definition. I see NO vascularity on her….at all.
I would also say she is hardly “buffed”. She’s simply toned and very fit.
Those are very good points,…but look at how great her butt is!
December 14, 2010 at 1:21 am #97764Tre Scott
ParticipantTo an average person in the U.S., she’s pretty ripped, regardless of what bodybuilders/bodybuilding fans think.
I wonder if her father is still trying to get her ‘erased’ from the internet.
October 8, 2011 at 7:45 am #103931GWHH
ParticipantOctober 8, 2011 at 11:46 pm #103939GWHH
ParticipantOctober 9, 2011 at 11:32 pm #103956GWHH
ParticipantOctober 16, 2011 at 1:59 am #104068GWHH
ParticipantJanuary 1, 2014 at 3:42 am #118658Nick Furry
Participantnever seen this one before.
Looks new to me. Never seem her this built or looking this “mature”
Anyone know when this one was taken?
some others of her:
http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/37m1iv53iib7z7hcjvo7tb690zkco53f/
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.