Alpha Artwork

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 27, 2006 at 7:44 pm #40398
    P. S
    Participant

    Don't know is this site has already been added to the links section.
    http://www.alphaartwork.com/menu/pics.htm

    Here are my favourites

    Sailor Moon
    http://www.alphaartwork.com/free/pics/gallery01/alpha039.jpg
    Daphne
    http://www.alphaartwork.com/free/pics/gallery01/alpha103.jpg
    Velma
    http://www.alphaartwork.com/free/pics/gallery01/alpha112.jpg
    April O'Neil
    http://www.alphaartwork.com/free/pics/gallery01/alpha097.jpg
    fairy tales
    http://www.alphaartwork.com/free/pics/gallery01/alpha063.jpg

    September 29, 2006 at 12:13 am #40399
    Rock Martin
    Participant

    Too bad it's a paysite… :'(

    Great time for me to be broke.

    September 29, 2006 at 6:14 am #40400
    TC2
    Participant

    Never liked the way he drew legs and faces, or abs… not something I'd pay for.

    September 29, 2006 at 6:41 am #40401
    Rock Martin
    Participant

    Never liked the way he drew legs and faces, or abs… not something I'd pay for.

    Is it too unrealistic?

    September 29, 2006 at 8:46 am #40402
    TC2
    Participant

    Yeah, too unrealistic and not well proportioned.  The arms and neck I usually enjoyed but the shape of the body was very awkward.  It's kind of like looking at a stick figure with muscles, though in some of his pictures he manages to get away from that.

    But in most cases it just doesn't look very realistic or appealing, it's not even an exaggerated artwork style or anything like that.  It's just not exactly work you should be paying for when compared to other artists.

    September 29, 2006 at 9:01 am #40403
    Rock Martin
    Participant

    Yeah, too unrealistic and not well proportioned.  The arms and neck I usually enjoyed but the shape of the body was very awkward.  It's kind of like looking at a stick figure with muscles, though in some of his pictures he manages to get away from that.

    But in most cases it just doesn't look very realistic or appealing, it's not even an exaggerated artwork style or anything like that.  It's just not exactly work you should be paying for when compared to other artists.

    But to be fair, isn't it OK to not be realistic at times? That Sailor Moon pic wasn't half bad for instance…

    September 29, 2006 at 4:13 pm #40404
    TC2
    Participant

    Actually I think his Sailor Moon is one of his best ones.

    But the Daphne one has her arms in awkward positions, she looks like a stick figure with beefy arm attachments.  Velma's calves are bigger than her quadriceps, and April has huge arms but tiny legs.

    There's no sense of balance in his illustrations, one body part will be randomly bigger than the other and it's definitely not something that's intentional.  Alpha's artwork is something to be viewed, not paid for.

    November 28, 2006 at 3:28 am #40405
    Muscle Growth Nut
    Participant

    Alpha's artwork is something to be viewed, not paid for.

    Speaking of which…

    January 18, 2007 at 9:56 am #40406
    CK
    Participant

    Oh, someone else to add to my watchlist, thanks for the heads up.

    I did join the site a few years back and the main reason to do so is sequences. Very nice and good number, but like many pay sites output isn't enough to justify staying subscribed IMO…

    January 18, 2007 at 7:12 pm #40407
    Zespara Alathar
    Participant

    Chris' artwork has certainly improved over the last couple of years.  His subject's legs are infinitely better as they are much more proportioned than they used to be. 

    I, for one, will never discourage an artist to keep on improving his craft.  Everyone's art on this site has improved from sheer practice and I think that it's great.  Keep it up everybody!

    Z

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.