- This topic has 15 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 8 months ago by
10-4.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 27, 2005 at 7:22 am #6793
10-4
ParticipantThat second clip is a little strange at first viewing. The neck bulging in sync with the biceps had me thinking about horror movies where nasty parasites burst out of peoples bodies. It almost looks like she’s possessed. The ending is pretty cool though.
By the way, how much did your animation software cost you? I was under the impression that Adobe Premiere was an expensive tool.
June 28, 2005 at 2:14 pm #6794tourist
ParticipantThat second clip is a little strange at first viewing. The neck bulging in sync with the biceps had me thinking about horror movies where nasty parasites burst out of peoples bodies. It almost looks like she’s possessed. The ending is pretty cool though.
I’m fascinated with intensity. i like work out videos of the women best.
i’ a little sick, i knowbut anyway the animation is old and i like to think i can do it better. let’s see what i can come up with in the future.
By the way, how much did your animation software cost you? I was under the impression that Adobe Premiere was an expensive tool.
in germany adobe has published premiere elements. it has all the features you need and costs about 80 euros. that’s about 100 bucks. the problem is that it only runs on windows xp and you need a pentium 4 or athlon xp or higher.
premiere pro is more for sophisticated but not nessesary. it is too expensive costing around 1.000 dollars. i couldn’t afford it, even if i ‘d like too.
t.
June 28, 2005 at 10:13 pm #6795Anonymous
GuestLovely animation. Would love to see how it develops. Thanks for posting!
June 28, 2005 at 10:19 pm #679610-4
Participant
in germany adobe has published premiere elements. it has all the features you need and costs about 80 euros. that’s about 100 bucks. the problem is that it only runs on windows xp and you need a pentium 4 or athlon xp or higher.premiere pro is more for sophisticated but not nessesary. it is too expensive costing around 1.000 dollars. i couldn’t afford it, even if i ‘d like too.
t.
I didn’t realize the price gap was that huge. I’ll have to look into it further.
June 29, 2005 at 2:18 pm #6797tourist
ParticipantI didn’t realize the price gap was that huge. I’ll have to look into it further.
you might want to try movie x one by aist.
it also has everything you need except you have to do the animation timing by hand because (at least the version which i have(4.0)) it imports every still image in 25 frames or a full second.
i can ‘t give you a link ’cause all the links i found are german.
there must be one though.
It’S FREEWARE (almost forgot)
one is http://www.aist.com, but i can find the free download there. try google if you’re interested.
it’s more sophisticated than movie maker or something and if your animation is not too long it will suffice.
try it.
t.
god, i’m exhausted now.
no, i’m no girl!!!!
June 29, 2005 at 6:25 pm #679810-4
ParticipantThanks for the info. I’ll check it out.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.