[zenta]

Lmao that’s…. that’s not what people’s issue is with these new outfits.

It’s that they went from cool, practical armour to……… dominatrix clothes. Sexualisation and all that

[unkn0wnx]

What’s wrong with Amazon dominatrix?

[stevexyz]

And if they were covered from head to toe they’d find something to complain about THAT!

Those scenes went by so fast you could hardly comprehend them before the next quick cut flashed by anyway. To me, that was the only interesting part about the whole movie.

[zenta]

What’s wrong with Amazon dominatrix?

Works better in giving 14 year-old boys boners than in the context of fighting gods, innit

Just seems like a step backwards to go from an empowering movie where these women could be strong and beautiful and not sexualised.

And if they were covered from head to toe they’d find something to complain about THAT!

The point of this is that folks really liked the practical designs of the original armour so…. no? What a strange take.

[AlexG]

Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder.
~ Michael Savage

“I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)

[zenta]

Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder.
~ Michael Savage

Crikey, that guy has been banned from entering my country because he advocated genocide of muslims. Not a very stand up dude tbh

[AlexG]

Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder.
~ Michael Savage

Crikey, that guy has been banned from entering my country because he advocated genocide of muslims. Not a very stand up dude tbh

Just a suggestion, but you might want to read up a bit more on the subject beforehand.

Link: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/26/obamas-assault-on-conservative-speech/

An attorney for the British government reaffirmed that the ban on popular talk-radio host Michael Savage will remain in place. Britain’s previous Labor government put the fiery conservative on a national enemies list along with Hamas terrorists, neo-Nazis and Russian skinheads – vicious men who have committed murder or other serious criminal acts. Mr. Savage is banned from entering Britain. High-ranking correspondence shows that he was chosen for one reason: to provide “balance” against the high number of Muslim extremists. Mr. Savage has been falsely painted as an Islamophobic bigot who risks inciting violence and “intercommunal” tension. For Britain’s powerful Muslim lobby, he has become public enemy No. 1. London has put a giant target on his back. Being officially compared with terrorist butchers and Russian gangsters has exposed the talk-show host to the possibility of retaliation – especially by some crazed Islamist.

There is not a scintilla of evidence, however, that Mr. Savage has called for or sparked criminal behavior – let alone violence and bloodshed. Britain’s political class is deliberately trying to destroy his good name and reputation. The hope that the Conservative government of Prime Minister David Cameron would repeal the outrageous ban vanished during Mr. Obama’s visit.

British government spokesman Michael Atkins wrote to Mr. Savage’s attorney, “Your client has not provided any evidence to show that he did not commit the unacceptable behaviour” that caused the “decision to exclude him, nor has your client provided any acceptable evidence to show his repudiation of those unacceptable behaviours.” The ban inverts the basic principle of Anglo-American jurisprudence: the presumption of innocence. Mr. Savage is presumed guilty until proved innocent.

Moreover, it represents a chilling assault on freedom of speech and freedom of the press. It is a naked attempt to delegitimize and criminalize conservative ideas. Even leftists such as Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University, have condemned the ban for imposing limits on free expression.

Several other links to similar such articles can be found here

Link: https://michaelsavage.com/2017/09/04/banned-in-britain-articles-denouncing-the-u-k-s-ban-on-savage/

I will conclude with this. In America we have a 1st Amendment protecting the individual citizen’s right to freedom of speech. That protection is not for popular speech, which does not require it, but for unpopular, even outrageous speech.

“I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)

[unkn0wnx]

I was kidding about Amazon dominatrix. Mentioning politics here is usually a mistake regardless which side you are on.

[TC2]

Can we not use terms like “liberal” or “conservative” when titling posts? It’s bad enough our parties have been fractured and aimed at each other’s throats, the last thing we need is for this place, the last place where individuals of any party, can come together and be unified in their love of female muscle.

It’s nice to come here and not have to worry about what other rights or freedoms are being taken away by the cheeto in chief.

[unkn0wnx]

Can we not use terms like “liberal” or “conservative” when titling posts? It’s bad enough our parties have been fractured and aimed at each other’s throats, the last thing we need is for this place, the last place where individuals of any party, can come together and be unified in their love of female muscle.

It’s nice to come here and not have to worry about what other rights or freedoms are being taken away by the cheeto in chief.

Aw man I agree with everything you said till you brought up Trump.

[Author]

Posts