- This topic has 17 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Len Geller.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 8, 2008 at 3:34 am #66838fbbfanParticipant
Thank you all for your kind feedback!
BTW — [size=14pt]kuopiofi[/size], I emptied my DA page because the DA threatened to ban me. There was a member who complained to them about me. She commented to me that she thought that depicting women with large busts was "disgusting and sick" and that she was going to complain to the management. She did. The DA stated to me that the morphs/warps/collages that I posted (as opposed to the thousands posted by others) "may have" violated DA policies and so they removed them. Apparently even the ones that I photographed myself violated some sort of policy. I certainly would not wish to have anything posted there that "may" violate any DA policies or offend anyone with such an incredibly weak &/or narrow-minded constitution so I removed the rest.
Tschuss!
HunterA shame, my favorite gallery in all of Deviant Art…I would randomly go there to see updates. It is a shame this woman found it offensive, she sounds like a total idiot. I would like to complain about her Hunter, what is her Deviant Name?
It is a woman could not appreciate the idea of female empowerment in your Art. I think it is a powerful ideal that your Art presents.
Perhaps a drawing of a caveman dragging a cavewoman by her hair(with her bust being modestly proportinate to frame) would best suit her tastes.
;D
Keep up the great work Hunter….
February 8, 2008 at 3:37 am #6683900treeParticipantThank you all for your kind feedback!
BTW — [size=14pt]kuopiofi[/size], I emptied my DA page because the DA threatened to ban me. There was a member who complained to them about me. She commented to me that she thought that depicting women with large busts was "disgusting and sick" and that she was going to complain to the management. She did. The DA stated to me that the morphs/warps/collages that I posted (as opposed to the thousands posted by others) "may have" violated DA policies and so they removed them. Apparently even the ones that I photographed myself violated some sort of policy. I certainly would not wish to have anything posted there that "may" violate any DA policies or offend anyone with such an incredibly weak &/or narrow-minded constitution so I removed the rest.
Tschuss!
HunterWhat a load of crap!!!
February 8, 2008 at 5:10 am #66840fasolaParticipantWhat a load of crap!!!
Yah indeed. I never thought someone could be so narrow-minded, and most of all, the "powers that be" at DA took her complains for real. She might be "servicing" someone there. It's just so stupid.
And Fbbfan might ge right, that caveman picture might be of her taste.Keep it up HSC.
February 8, 2008 at 11:21 am #66841kuopiofiParticipantWell crud… DA has really been going downward lately. :'(
Have you tought about moving into FurAffinity? They have more liberal attitude towards a bit o' skin.
February 9, 2008 at 3:19 am #66842The HighlanderParticipantWhat a bad week for us. First Satsurou stops his comic, then this. I hope you mange to repost this elsewhere.
February 11, 2008 at 1:05 am #66843ze flyParticipantencouraged her to join the local gym and try to get healthier. She did.
Indeed… ;D Thanks a lot for this other superb drawing!
February 11, 2008 at 7:06 pm #66844Prophet TenebraeParticipantDA are a fucking joke, they have a hugely inconsistent application of their T&C… and from the sounds of it, they didn't even know if you were breaking them – which isn't exactly encouraging.
To be honest, quite why you'd be on a site called deviant art and be surprised that there's weird stuff on there is beyond me… Presumably DA are just scared that one day someone is going to sue them.
February 12, 2008 at 10:06 pm #66845Len GellerParticipantSay Hunter, you may not be the only one whose works have been censored.
All of Cribinbic's morphs are gone too, though not necessarily for the same
reason (he may have pulled them voluntarily). Regardless, I loathe censorship
of adult material, especially if it does not involve violence or degradation. If
someone is offended by a photo or drawing, they don't have to look at it!!
But why should a complaint by one viewer legislate for eveyone else? The real
dipshits in this case are the censors at DA. Hope this is not a harbinger of things
to come. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.