- This topic has 413 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 5 months ago by Bane Dorrance.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 28, 2013 at 11:16 am #118589BlackKusanagiParticipant
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/12/26/gal-gadot-talks-wonder-woman-casting-and-prep
Annnd our query’s are answered.
December 28, 2013 at 1:37 pm #118592Nick FurryParticipantWonder Woman can have small breasts! Batman vs. Superman star Gal Gadot hits back at fans who say she is too skinny and flat-chested for the role
January 8, 2014 at 2:23 pm #118797Nick FurryParticipantJanuary 11, 2014 at 9:10 pm #118858rugbyguyParticipant“I represent the Wonder Woman of the new world. Breasts… anyone can buy for 9,000 shekels and everything is fine. By the way, Wonder Woman is amazonian, and historically accurate amazonian women actually had only one breast. So, if I’d really go ‘by the book’…it’d be problematic.”
OK, so she hasn’t read the comics either.
There is very little about Diana Prince and the William Moulton Marston/DC comics that has anything to do with the amazons Gadot is talking about.
Just to be soooper-picky; it wouldn’t be historically accurate, it would be mythologically accurate.She may work out but right now she’s digging herself a B-cup sized hole.
January 11, 2014 at 9:12 pm #118859rugbyguyParticipantMore proof the world is spiraling out of control.
January 11, 2014 at 9:27 pm #118860AlexGKeymaster“I represent the Wonder Woman of the new world. Breasts… anyone can buy for 9,000 shekels and everything is fine. By the way, Wonder Woman is amazonian, and historically accurate amazonian women actually had only one breast. So, if I’d really go ‘by the book’…it’d be problematic.”
OK, so she hasn’t read the comics either.
There is very little about Diana Prince and the William Moulton Marston/DC comics that has anything to do with the amazons Gadot is talking about.
Just to be soooper-picky; it wouldn’t be historically accurate, it would be mythologically accurate.She may work out but right now she’s digging herself a B-cup sized hole.
Thought I’d pass this along. B)
Since the original link to emuseum.mnsu.edu is now defunct,
got this via the Internet Wayback Machine.“I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)January 18, 2014 at 8:24 pm #118990HolidayParticipantWarner Bros. has announced that the release date for the next Superman film will be postponed until 2016. Now some WW fans say this just allows Gal Gadot more time to work out for the role.
That could not have been any more presumptuous. We don’t know exactly what the extent of her role will be and what her shooting schedule will become now. But to spend another year pumping up for a role that willl take less than eight weeks to shoot doesn’t make sense unless she’s paid well. She’ll have to risk foregoing any other possible roles until post-production starts.
No. I don’t think we can expect a significant increase in muscle mass from her for this role.
January 25, 2014 at 4:47 am #119091SteveGParticipantTo be entirely honest, since Man of Steel itself was such a bleak, solemn, and sorry excuse for a Superman picture, I don’t see Warner/DC really being able to make an entertaining Wonder Woman.
The buzz apparently is that the title is Batman versus Superman, which doesn’t suggest they will be lightening the mood lately. The DC superhero universe is currently a bleak and ugly train wreck, and Wonder Woman’s world in it has been destroyed and she’s been left as a hanger-on of the Olympian gods.
If Wonder Woman’s movie debut is anything like MoS, I am not interested. DC has pretty much kicked Wonder Woman to the curb in the comic books, and I’ve generally lost interest in their product as a result.
January 25, 2014 at 7:26 am #119092AshleeParticipantYeah Its bad ,DC seems to have a war on muscle women!!!
January 26, 2014 at 9:21 pm #119129HolidayParticipantTo be entirely honest, since Man of Steel itself was such a bleak, solemn, and sorry excuse for a Superman picture, I don’t see Warner/DC really being able to make an entertaining Wonder Woman.
The buzz apparently is that the title is Batman versus Superman, which doesn’t suggest they will be lightening the mood lately. The DC superhero universe is currently a bleak and ugly train wreck, and Wonder Woman’s world in it has been destroyed and she’s been left as a hanger-on of the Olympian gods.
If Wonder Woman’s movie debut is anything like MoS, I am not interested. DC has pretty much kicked Wonder Woman to the curb in the comic books, and I’ve generally lost interest in their product as a result.
I must confess I purposely skipped Man of Steel at the theatres. From the first trailer I knew it wasn’t what I loved about Superman. Bad enough it was another retelling of his origin, but they had to have Zack Snyderr and David Goyer handling it?
Day of the Doctor, now that was a wonderful anniversary event for a classic hero. No mid-life crisis for the Doctor, but the Man of Steel is clearly on Viagra
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.