Diana Cast in Man of Steel 2

Viewing 10 posts - 51 through 60 (of 414 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #119484
    luvemhuge5699
    Participant

    looks like shes been working out. has A LONG way to go, but, shes at least trying and has till june before they start shooting.

    #119485
    luvemhuge5699
    Participant

    heres a link to 1 of the MANY articles on this picture http://screenrant.com/gal-gadot-wonder-woman-workout-photos/

    #119542
    AlexG
    Keymaster

    I still think Gemma Arterton would have made for a far better choice as WW.

    But then, that’s just me. 😉

    “I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
    ~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)

    #119547
    Snotling
    Participant

    I still think Gemma Arterton would have made for a far better choice as WW.

    But then, that’s just me. 😉

    Slightly on the shorter side of the spectrum at 5’7″ but very much better than Gal Gadot that’s for sure… here is MY List:

    Adrianne Palicki: She’s the perfect 30 y/o for the role, she’s only needs a few protein shakes and the right bra to fill the costume. She’s never had a real big role but she has shown potential and she has a variety of experience.

    Jenna Elfman: If they want to go the “Affleck Way” and cast a more mature WW, She definitely can act. Bulk her up a little and dye her hair, I think she could pull it off.

    Leelee Sobieski: Somewhat the same reasons as Adrianne Palicki, except she needs a bit more time in the Gym and a dye job.

    Deborah Ann Woll: she has the attitude, the talent… The BODY! Just give her the right personal trainer, a dye job and a bit of spray tan.

    Tricia Helfer: Like Jenna Elfman age wise, except with a more rugged appearance and less comedic side depending on what the director likes best.

    Laura Prepon: She can act, she has a stronger frame so she should turn into quite the amazon if she’s given the right diet and training. Agewise, she’s in between… If you want an actress that looks and acts mature enough but who will last for that 6 movies deal, there she is.

    Natasha Henstridge: The real questions is “Would I pick her over Tricia Helfer?” She’d make a kick ass WW no doubt about it.

    Mandy Moore: It’s the looks, introduce her to the trainer Jessica Biel had for “Blade: Trinity” and she’s a total amazon admirer’s wet dream. Her acting on the other hand…

    Liv Tyler: Also for the looks, she has enough movie acting experience that’s for sure but I can’t shake off the feeling that there is something wrong with her that I can’t describe.

    #119650
    rugbyguy
    Participant

    Kelly Overton – 5’7″

    #119730
    rugbyguy
    Participant

    Yule Brenner? Seriously? _ sorry about that.

    Here’re a few that shopukld stick around. Kelly Overton is 5’7, she can act, and she’s done matial arts movies (Tekken)

    #119851
    AlexG
    Keymaster

    I still think Gemma Arterton would have made for a far better choice as WW.

    But then, that’s just me. 😉

    Slightly on the shorter side of the spectrum at 5’7″ but very much better than Gal Gadot that’s for sure…

    As a serious consideration, I don’t think the real world height of the actress playing the character is that much of issue w/ a movie – or w/ the audience for that matter. Afterall, they had Halle Berry @ 5′-5″ portraying the six-foot Storm in the X-Men movies w/o much of any criticism about that factor.

    “I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
    ~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)

    #119853
    Snotling
    Participant

    [quote=”Snotling” post=116942][quote=”AlexG” post=116937]I still think Gemma Arterton would have made for a far better choice as WW.

    But then, that’s just me. 😉

    Slightly on the shorter side of the spectrum at 5’7″ but very much better than Gal Gadot that’s for sure…[/quote]

    As a serious consideration, I don’t think the real world height of the actress playing the character is that much of issue w/ a movie – or w/ the audience for that matter. Afterall, they had Halle Berry @ 5′-5″ portraying the six-foot Storm in the X-Men movies w/o much of any criticism about that factor.[/quote]

    It depends on the role, Storm is not a physically dominant character. Diana on the other hand is and I know they can use camera tricks to make her look Superman at eye level but for action scenes, she won’t be standing on a wooden box and they can’t have a different set of stunt men around her than those who are surrounding Batman.

    #119856
    TC2
    Participant

    Have you guys not seen Lord of the Rings?

    Trust, even for the action scenes they will make Diana appear tall. They’ll either use a stunt double or bring the camera tight or won’t have her on screen at the same time as the other dudes.

    It’s not that difficult to make someone look tall, at all.

    #121628
    luvemhuge5699
    Participant

    FIRST PICTURE OF GAL GADOT AS WONDER WOMAN from comic con.

    http://www.theverge.com/2014/7/26/5939933/batman-v-superman-comic-con-wonder-woman-first-image

    , on Flickr

Viewing 10 posts - 51 through 60 (of 414 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.