One of my friends works for Comedy central, and she stated that the Butterjunk effect is a test
for a spinoff series, featuring girls that use nectar, I don’t know what the story line would be or any of its true.she was pretty tipsy. when we were talking about it.
It’s true! My dad works for Nintendo, and he told me all about it!
They still make those things?? 😛 never heard of one since , i was in Jr. high :laugh:
[quote=”Ashlee” post=108914]One of my friends works for Comedy central, and she stated that the Butterjunk effect is a test
for a spinoff series, featuring girls that use nectar, I don’t know what the story line would be or any of its true.she was pretty tipsy. when we were talking about it.
It’s true! My dad works for Nintendo, and he told me all about it![/quote]
I like the idea of the spin-off.
I also like to think what would happen if Fry wasn’t cover in butterfly Junk, and Amy and Leela kept using nectar. 👿
MGN could you please clarify whether you’re being serious or sarcastic when you say “It’s true…all about it”?
MGN could you please clarify whether you’re being serious or sarcastic when you say “It’s true…all about it”?
Er, I’m pretty sure he was being sarcastic.
And with good cause. There will be sequel to the movie “Ishtar” before there is a spin-off for
the “Butter-Junk Effect”.
Yes, I was being sarcastic. “My dad works for Nintendo” is pretty much code for “This is bullshit.”
I know you were :laugh: , remenber i’m trying to get her in the mood for some les Love , and we were talking about how well scrpited the episode was, compared to “strong arms of the mam”. :angry:
and I kept pouring her “friut drinks”. :blush: :silly: 👿
Yes, I was being sarcastic. “My dad works for Nintendo” is pretty much code for “This is bullshit.”
Hadn’t heard that before. Maybe a generation difference… The whole scenario seemed improbable to say the least. But it’s hard to be sure of sarcasm in text. I figured non-native speakers would like to be certain.
and we were talking about how well scrpited the episode was, compared to “strong arms of the mam”. :angry:
You’re still on that? :huh:
Hadn’t heard that before. Maybe a generation difference… The whole scenario seemed improbable to say the least. But it’s hard to be sure of sarcasm in text. I figured non-native speakers would like to be certain.
Don’t really know what generation you’re from, but when my age group was in childhood, everyone knew at least one lying jackass who would make stuff up about video games or whatever and claim it was totally true because their dad totally worked for Nintendo.
(Seriously, though, the fact that I invoked Nintendo to verify claims about a Futurama spinoff should’ve been a clue.)
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |