- This topic has 111 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 3 months ago by
Bane Dorrance.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 14, 2012 at 12:42 pm #109968
khuddle
ParticipantAnd Sharon Marvel was a towering 5’3. I know, I know, she got seriously
big during her career (particularly during the off-season), but put her
next to Tina Lockwood, Lora Ottenad, Cornelia Brandt and Nina Loebert in their
prime and she would have been laughed off-stage.
Who are we going to be calling a heavyweight next? Barbara Fletcher?September 14, 2012 at 1:51 pm #109969Jared
ParticipantAnd Sharon Marvel was a towering 5’3. I know, I know, she got seriously
big during her career (particularly during the off-season), but put her
next to Tina Lockwood, Lora Ottenad, Cornelia Brandt and Nina Loebert in their
prime and she would have been laughed off-stage.
Who are we going to be calling a heavyweight next? Barbara Fletcher?Why did they get rid of the heavyweight and lightweight at the Olympia and Ms. International anyway?
Lora Ottenad is huge!
Other heavyweights fbbs for me are Iris Kyle, Kim Chizevsky in her prime, Geraldine Morgan, sheila bleck, and a few others.
September 15, 2012 at 5:33 am #109973ant1937
ParticipantI was talking off season Chris. It is true that she or Sharon Marvel were not the 200 pound level off season or on the heavier side of the HW division. I could care less about judging. I’m talking overall appeal. Sharon and Collette can be my little HW’s and Amber D and Gina D my bigger ones. I like almost all of the big girls though. Those are my faves based on appeal to me personally. Judging in the sport sucks. You know that.
September 15, 2012 at 5:35 am #109975ant1937
ParticipantNot sure Sharon at her biggest would be laughed off by standing next to Laura Ottenad….whom I also liked. Yes, the shorter girls have a max size they will get to. Sharon was about 5-3. Laura was 5-7. I’m, not sure she was even as thick, let alone someone that would blow Sharon off the stage. Marvel was a monster for a year or 2. 180 offseason at the lightest. I saw her in person. She was super thick….offseason at 180 of course.
September 15, 2012 at 5:42 am #109977AlexG
KeymasterDenise Rutkowski
“I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)September 15, 2012 at 3:32 pm #109982chris10000
ParticipantI was talking off season Chris.
are we talking muscles or are we talking about fat ? ?
if you want a big fat woman, the country is full of them , they dwarf every fbb….200 lbs ?…at our fat girls 300 pounds is average
September 15, 2012 at 3:55 pm #109983chris10000
ParticipantNot sure Sharon at her biggest would be laughed off by standing next to Laura Ottenad….whom I also liked. Yes, the shorter girls have a max size they will get to. Sharon was about 5-3. Laura was 5-7. I’m, not sure she was even as thick, let alone someone that would blow Sharon off the stage. Marvel was a monster for a year or 2. 180 offseason at the lightest. I saw her in person. She was super thick….offseason at 180 of course.
sharon marvel had some good muscles on stage, but offseason she was ugly FAT ! ….
i think you dont see the difference between muscle and fat…but its easy , fat cant get flexed, fat isnt ripped, if you cant see the muscle fibers fat is covering themSeptember 15, 2012 at 11:47 pm #109985ant1937
ParticipantI know the difference. I like the women with their water weight. I never though Sharon was fat. I don’t like the way girls look for contests all dehydrated and their faces look awful. They don’t even like it.
Not a big contest guy. Don’t like the fake tans or the dehydration. Maybe that is why the offseason girls often have more popular shoots than the contest look. Gina Davis was a perfect example. Almost everyone liked her offseason look better than when she was all cut up.
To each his own though. Peace bro.
September 15, 2012 at 11:50 pm #109986ant1937
ParticipantI have a different opinion of Colette and Sharon after meeting them. I would not compare either with an average fat 200 or 300 pound woman. Not sure when you saw them looking that bad. I’m not into fat girls unless they have lots of power to go with it. Most of the strongest women in weightlifting do in fact carry some fat.
September 16, 2012 at 2:27 am #109989chris10000
ParticipantI know the difference. I like the women with their water weight. I
water weight ? ? 😆
extra water weight is called if a fbb is using the wron steroid like testo depot or dianabol….normal water looks different…no, sharon was fat, as also colette nelsonnext time you tell me she is offseason with waterweight:
http://amaz0ns.com/forum/Female-Athletes–Muscular-Women/100041-Anna-Konda(now as i post the link i saw its you who posted :dry: )
To each his own though. Peace bro.
sure peace 😆 …thats a discussion, not a fight
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.