Johanna Dejager

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 63 total)
1 2 3 … 5 6 7
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 29, 2008 at 2:28 pm #73289
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Go Jo! 8)

    September 2, 2008 at 4:41 pm #73290
    jdfan
    Participant

    She came 3rd in the middleweights. Well done Jo!

    Pics:http://www.musculardevelopment.com/browse/index.php?mode=contest&eventcode=1283

    Once again the judges decision is a mystery to me. J's biceps are twice the size of the 1st and 2nd place girls put together. Her abs, legs, conditioning and shape are the best too. They had it right when they made her competitor number '1'

    September 2, 2008 at 8:26 pm #73291
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Pics:http://www.musculardevelopment.com/browse/index.php?mode=contest&eventcode=1283

    I was about to say much the same thing.  Baffling. ??? ::)

    September 3, 2008 at 4:02 am #73292
    00tree
    Participant

    3RD?

    ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

    September 3, 2008 at 6:24 am #73293
    elee0228
    Participant

    Yes, she definitely should have placed higher.  Ah, just noticed I broke a link in the first post, so I'm reposting that plus a new gif animation I cobbled together.

    September 3, 2008 at 4:18 pm #73294
    jdfan
    Participant

    Yes, she definitely should have placed higher.  Ah, just noticed I broke a link in the first post, so I'm reposting that plus a new gif animation I cobbled together.
    …

    Nice tricep animation. That vid was shot in 2003. Hard to believe she's been looking so good for so long.

    I think she might be competing at the Canadians in Montreal this weekend – not sure – so don't count on it. She placed 3rd in the MW and masters last year. Here's hoping she can win this year.

    September 3, 2008 at 6:30 pm #73295
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    I think it's a conspiracy against the athlete that proves that it's possible without steroids.  It has to be.  How else did they place her third when her physique was clearly better than at least one of the others?

    September 3, 2008 at 7:26 pm #73296
    jdfan
    Participant

    I don't think it's a conspiracy – more a case of who knows who. The judges can also be swayed by national and local allegiances and the level of support in the audience for a particular girl.

    September 3, 2008 at 7:29 pm #73297
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    I don't think it's a conspiracy – more a case of who knows who. The judges can also be swayed by national and local allegiances and the level of support in the audience for a particular girl.

    Then they shouldn't be judges.  What's the point if the rankings are going to be swayed by the phases of the moon and where the contest is taking place?! ::) ;D

    September 4, 2008 at 2:15 am #73298
    Fett
    Participant

    She definitely looks the best of the three.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 63 total)
1 2 3 … 5 6 7
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.