- This topic has 18 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Prophet Tenebrae.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2007 at 1:26 am #63116The Muffin manParticipant
I didn't call him anti-American. I did make fun of him for finding fault with the United States of America as a nation because of comic book pricing and delivery schedules in Canada. Regardless, he did not counter-post or explain himself, so I assume that me making fun of him was a secondary or tertiary cause.
But I'm glad you consider banning someone without explanation to be 'unhelpful'.
So you attacked him because he made a joke?
November 9, 2007 at 1:31 am #63117LingsterKeymasterSo you attacked him because he made a joke?
He wasn't joking, and I didn't attack him. I just poked fun at him.
November 9, 2007 at 7:12 am #63118the lonsterParticipantHe wasn't joking, and I didn't attack him. I just poked fun at him.
No Offense…But isn't poking fun at someone considered a type of joke. ???
November 9, 2007 at 7:22 am #63119stmercy2020ParticipantNo Offense…But isn't poking fun at someone considered a type of joke. ???
Yes- Lingster was joking, the moderator who banned him was not. Or, to put it another way, Lingster made a humorous comment that was intended to show how ridiculous the (apparently deadly serious)) position of blaming the U.S. for Canadian inequities was. The moderator decided to be a- is there a polite way to call someone a dick?- and banned him for it. There are some assumptions at work here- primarily the reason that Lingster was banned- because the moderator in question did not see fit to send either warning or explanation for his actions.
November 9, 2007 at 7:35 am #63120LingsterKeymasterThe moderator decided to be a- is there a polite way to call someone a dick?- and banned him for it.
"Poopyhead"?
November 9, 2007 at 8:51 am #63121the lonsterParticipantYes- Lingster was joking, the moderator who banned him was not. Or, to put it another way, Lingster made a humorous comment that was intended to show how ridiculous the (apparently deadly serious)) position of blaming the U.S. for Canadian inequities was. The moderator decided to be a- is there a polite way to call someone a dick?- and banned him for it. There are some assumptions at work here- primarily the reason that Lingster was banned- because the moderator in question did not see fit to send either warning or explanation for his actions.
So in other words….Someone has no sense of humor and is being a crybaby bitch about it and decided to get revenge on him.
March 4, 2008 at 4:25 am #63122Evan StanleyParticipantI'm stiull trying to understand why there would be anti-femuscle on a She Hulk board.
That's like buying a subscription to GUNS & AMMO and sending letters to the editor about all these firearms in the magazine!
March 4, 2008 at 6:20 am #63123Matthew SichermanParticipantI'm stiull trying to understand why there would be anti-femuscle on a She Hulk board.
That's like buying a subscription to GUNS & AMMO and sending letters to the editor about all these firearms in the magazine!
Why did Statler and Waldorf keep going to see The Muppet Show night after night from the exact same balcony seats just to yell about how terrible the acts were every single time? Some people paradoxically enjoy viewing something they hate just so they can yell about how much they hate it and ruin the show for everybody else.
March 4, 2008 at 8:40 pm #63124Prophet TenebraeParticipantIt seems rather late in the day to be raking over the ashes of this again…
It's a She-Hulk message board… the character being drawn as… well, hulking is a relatively recent occurrence. She-Hulk is not synonymous with femuscle, so… it's hardly a conflict of interests to like She-Hulk but dislike femuscle…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.