- This topic has 8 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by AlexG.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 12, 2009 at 9:48 pm #88700grosumParticipant
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1234270/Men-dont-Lily-type-long-legs-attractive–honest.html
???
Of course we all know who has the best legs in the sport…bar none!!December 13, 2009 at 4:42 am #88701Robert McNayParticipanthttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1234270/Men-dont-Lily-type-long-legs-attractive–honest.html
???
Of course we all know who has the best legs in the sport…bar none!!I'd like to know where they get some of these survey participants. Personally, long legs are a wonderful thing, especially if they exhibit some strength or muscle. To me, its what makes women like Rihanna beautiful. Female volleyball players are incredible and most of them are very tall with long, athletic legs, like Gabriella Reese.
The guys who participated in this survey wouldn't know beauty if it bit 'em in the butt. :-
December 14, 2009 at 7:09 am #88702randy guillotteParticipantMaybe that Aussie gal had it right in the comments. Lots of men can be intimidated by a woman with long legs especially if it makes them look shorter in stature. Kind of like most men not liking women with muscles bigger than their own because it makes them appear weaker. I know I sure don't suffer from it… ;D
December 14, 2009 at 3:44 pm #88703TonusParticipantIt's not that surprising when you understand what the criteria were:
Faced with the choice of a woman whose legs are much longer than the rest of her body and another whose legs account for half her height, men will set their sights on the latter, a study found.
In other words, men are more likely to prefer a woman with a physique that is balanced in terms of proportions, as opposed to one with legs that are "much" longer than the rest of her body. I suspect that the wording is what threw them. Had they simply asked, do prefer a woman with long legs, the "yes" replies would have been more common.
December 14, 2009 at 11:06 pm #88704TC2ParticipantI believe Tonus hit the nail on the head. If you look at a woman with disproportionately long legs, it's actually quite unattractive. I saw one girl in Atlantic city who was practically all legs and there was no meat to em! It was quite gross.
December 14, 2009 at 11:19 pm #88705FonkParticipantYou can prove anything with statistics… provided you word the questions poorly. Tonus has got it spot on.
December 15, 2009 at 4:01 am #88706grosumParticipantOK, what about these "gems"
http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/FFKCELJIS2DXMOKN32RICOMIDA
Legs are not long but very full don't ya think?December 19, 2009 at 6:24 am #88707FlakBaitKeymaster3 out of 4 penguins do not agree with this survey…..but I think the 4th is stoned……
reminds me of a survey Penn and Teller did on an episode of their Bulls*it series on the environment when they went to an environmental rally and got everyone they asked there to sign a petition to ban dihydrogen monoxide because it was in our atmosphere and too much of it can kill you. God I love surveys 😛
December 19, 2009 at 3:05 pm #88708AlexGKeymasterI seem to recall that WPWMax.com offers an entire gallery collection of nothing but legs of femuscular women.
And then you have Hermuscles with their Herlegs site.
I guess that they don't know what men like, huh? 😉
“I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907) -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.