- This topic has 21 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by cpbell0033944.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 1, 2009 at 8:21 pm #87224Solarian, aka LordDarothParticipant
And you have some work for me? 🙂
October 2, 2009 at 1:51 am #87225CaptMalcomReynoldsParticipantIn all honesty, I agree with Lingster. The women portrayed look really young and the fact that many of them are in school girl outfits adds to the perception that you're drawing underage stuff.
I know.. I know.. people will get pissed off at me and say "What are you talking about?! It's art!" but there should be a little more taste and selectivity. There ARE laws which address what types of artworks constitute valid artistic merit vs those which don't. Some of the depictions here, could be questionable.
In the end, what is the fascination with highschool teenagers?
October 2, 2009 at 4:31 am #87226TonusParticipantI don't think that's it. If I had to hazard a guess, they look like they're in their early 20s. I figured that Lingster was referring to the more sexually explicit images.
October 2, 2009 at 5:39 am #87227CaptMalcomReynoldsParticipantI don't think that's it. If I had to hazard a guess, they look like they're in their early 20s. I figured that Lingster was referring to the more sexually explicit images.
You still have to be careful. 18 U.S.C. (law) discusses some these concerns. I believe there are also laws which deal with things which may be concidered "obscene". Of course, it depends on what people would perceive as "reasonable" in a court of law. As you know, not too many people are into female bodybuilding to begin with. Merge with that their perceptions of what "appears" to be young women (whether real or not hence the emphasis on "obscenity") engaged in questionable acts, and there may be a problem.
Aside from that, on the adult nature of the site, don't forget that there may be also be questions regarding accessibility to what may be considered "adult" material or themes.
In all honesty, and this is up to Lingster of course, I wouldn't mind Amaz0ns.com becoming a site which requires a "login" before accessing anything. This prevents the normal passerby from seeing ALL images unless they log in and allows moderators in house to clean up stuff without things being first broadcast to the whole worldor random browsers, when mistakes or misunderstandings occur.
As I said that's just me. A lot of forums already do this. *shrug*
October 2, 2009 at 6:04 am #87228TC2ParticipantPersonally anytime NSFW comes up I'm expecting to see something like this. However, when Lingster says that some of the images are over the line I am pretty sure he is referring to the porngraphic content of sex.
This is the same thing that happened to the other poster Gilzara who had some giantess images removed or banned because they had massive cocks going into women's vagina's. I don't see anything in the pictures that really truly represents "under age" so nothing of under 18 laws have been broken. However, the amount of sausages and sexual content is what I believe Lingster is objecting to.
This is a relatively clean site where the most you will see is full front nudity but not sexual content like this. So the top two pictures are fine because no one is getting boned. It's the penis between the breasts and the pure penetration in some pictures that are causing a stir.
This is my own opinion but I personally do not come to the forum to see THAT kind of graphic content. If I want to see that I will go to the site themselves, but I'm more or less just looking for beautifully muscular physiques and sculpted bodies. I don't consider this place a porn site and there are other places I can go to, to find content like that. So I prefer Lingster just keeps this place clean with some nudity but no outright penetration. Even the ads he has on the site have nothing to do with penetration, just mainly female nudity.
October 2, 2009 at 8:16 am #87229DTMParticipantSorry guys, I really didnt mean to cause any issues or upset anyone with these pictures. Ill more than happily remove any that are deemed inappropriate here, just let me know which ones they are and Ill do so.
As for the legality of sex and age, well I dont want this to escalate into anything heated, nor to I want to offend anyone in the least, I just want to point out that America does have the highest legal sex age in the world (and is in the minority of countries that do so), leaving much of the rest of the planet with a younger, perfectly legal, age of sex. I currently live in New Zealand (though Im originally from New York) and the legal age here is 16. Legal sexual age varies from country to country, and this being an online site (which of course caters to people all over the world), Im not sure its as cut and dry to say sex acts Must be 18 or over (especially when theyre depicted with partners of their own age level).
I dont want to ruffle anyones feathers here, I do come by every so often and post my pics for you all to enjoy (as I did in this case), and again Im more than fine removing any of these pics (or having them removed) if the powers that be want it so.
Thanks all.
October 2, 2009 at 8:22 am #87230DTMParticipantFunny, I just went to remove all of the Sexual pics (the 2nd halves of Amy 5 and Muscular Confession) and I realized I dont seem to be able to Edit my initial post anymore (I guess that option disappears after a while?) As such, I more than encourage Lingster to have those removed, and of course my apologies to anyone here who they may have offended. Thanks.
October 2, 2009 at 8:42 am #87231CaptMalcomReynoldsParticipantLegal sexual age varies from country to country, and this being an online site (which of course caters to people all over the world), Im not sure its as cut and dry to say sex acts Must be 18 or over (especially when theyre depicted with partners of their own age level).
Doesn't matter if the website is hosted in the United States. In technicality, that would make someone liable under U.S. law regardless of their country of origin. Furthermore, it's not really about the age of consent, many states in the U.S. have that as the age of 16, it is what is defined as a "minor" under Federal law and it how it pertains to works of artistic merrit vs works which maybe defined as not possessing artistic merrit. In U.S. Federal law, that age is 18.
I'm just saying at this will be the last time I post.
Anyways, I'm not trying go into legalize about all of this stuff and nor am I lawyer. However, I don't think the new posting rules are unreasonable. In the end, I think that most of us can say that it is better to be safe than sorry.
October 2, 2009 at 2:50 pm #87232cpbell0033944Participantn viewing the images again I agree that the sex act stuff (whilst well-drawn) is really beyond the remit of this community. Two hot girls kissing or nipples on show is fine with a NSFW tag, but BJs and penetration is going a bit far for what is a non-porn site.
October 2, 2009 at 8:26 pm #87233luvmuslgirlsParticipantI dont want to ruffle anyones feathers here, I do come by every so often and post my pics for you all to enjoy (as I did in this case), and again Im more than fine removing any of these pics (or having them removed) if the powers that be want it so.
Thanks all.
Maybe post links to view them on your site? With warnings on the links? That takes the actual images off of Amaz0ns. IDK, would that be better?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.