- This topic has 94 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by cpbell0033944.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 27, 2008 at 3:26 pm #77510AlexGKeymaster
Careful, I know my Ezekiel 25:17 and ain't afraid to use it. đ
I DESERVE A HOT TASTY BURGER! *raises fist and is shot for even bringing it up*
âI like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.â
~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)December 27, 2008 at 4:14 pm #77511AlexGKeymasterMimi is the one who can give you the best answer, but basically, in a thumbnail, they reacted with (and I'm probably being kind here) disdain to the concept of a Quantum Leap episode featuring a FBBr in the role of the "crisis point personage" that the character Sam Beckett leaps into and takes over.
Just actually why they blew it off . . . well, they can be an intensive lot, vocally outspoken about their view(s) on FBBing, sometimes to their own detriment. In this case, my observation of it was that they felt burned one too many times by other past FBBr appearances in television/movies and instantly rejected it at once. Now to be fair, a very few there did favor it, tepidly, but were overwhelmed by the tidal wave of negative voices.
An example of: if we canât have it our way, then weâd prefer nothing at all.
As a result, based on their reaction, the producers seeing this nearly killed the project.
My own view is, they should have come to forums like Amaz0ns for a broader sampling of the potential acceptance of it.
Can you guys clue me in on the mess over at unreal? I don't go there much and rarely watch the wwe any longer. Too much talking and the girls are too thin for me. They are hot for sure. Don't get me wrong.
âI like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.â
~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)December 27, 2008 at 7:40 pm #77512cpbell0033944ParticipantAs AlexG alludes to, they seemingly had a pissy fit about the prospect of an FBBer appearing in the mainstream. I suspect this panicked them as they want to keep FBBing for themselves and are a very reactionary group of people. I learned this to my cost (I cancelled my account there as a result of being shouted down when I dared to disagree with the party line).
December 27, 2008 at 9:45 pm #77513MimiParticipant[font=tahoma][font=georgia]~Mimi[/font][/size”>
December 28, 2008 at 7:22 am #77514ReasonParticipant[font=tahoma]
December 28, 2008 at 10:20 am #77515ant1937ParticipantThanks for the update. I thought this was why the wwe was staying away from fbbs, but you explained why Qauntum leap is. Thanks. I guess I can see why NBC is in the toilet. Network management boggles my mind these days. I can't believe some of what I see and know goes on. Blows me away.
December 28, 2008 at 6:42 pm #77516ReasonParticipantThanks for the update. I thought this was why the wwe was staying away from fbbs, but you explained why Qauntum leap is. Thanks. I guess I can see why NBC is in the toilet. Network management boggles my mind these days. I can't believe some of what I see and know goes on. Blows me away.
I'm not sure if you know this yet, but the Quantum Leap project is a non-profit fan project and has nothing to do with NBC, although the production team may have sussed them out first to make sure they weren't in danger of being sued.
This is the sort of thing I would love to see our community do one day. Instead of bitching about muscular female characters never being used in mainstream movies, we could just make one ourselves. All the reasons people give for it being impossible are being disproved by these guys as we speak!
I personally love the WWE for how prominently it features athletic and muscular women. I mean when I watched it in the 80s as a kid, I don't remember seeing any female wrestlers at all, and certainly not super hot ones. Now there's a whole championship division, which gets a decent segment on every episode. Sure, I wish there was more than one with a Beth Phoenix type physique, but compared with the rest of the shows on TV, it's pretty damn amazing.
December 28, 2008 at 10:23 pm #77517cpbell0033944ParticipantMimi – it isn't your fault AT ALL. You did a good thing in bringing attention to a potentially exciting project. The fault lies entirely with the loons over at Unreal who wouldn't know a good thing if it hit them in the face. What on earth did they find to bitch about? How could there be any complaint about the casting of an FBBer in a positive role such as this? It's astonishing. You're better-off away from there. I had a similar situation – I dared mention the s-word a couple of times and, on the second occasion, had a nasty, spiteful reply to my post telling me to shut up and trying to instruct me what I could and could't say. I made no accusations of abuse about any competitors, just general points about the problems faced by FBBing. The hostility came, I think, for 2 reasons.
Firstly, they didn't dare mention the s-word. It's taboo. Somehow, mentioning steroids is, to them like slapping all FBBers in the face. Secondly, some there actually seemed turned-on specifically by the androgenisation itself. No problem, I don't care what floats their boat, but I did not like being sneered-at when I said that I disliked square jaws, heavy brow arches etc. It's a matter of personal preference.
I love this place because we are hosted by a benevolent dictator who, with the help of folks like AlexG, makes sure that 99.9% of the c*** that infests other sites stays away. I may disagree with Lingster on many subjects, but, as a host, he is fearless in standing-up for athletic women and those of us who love, appreciate and support them without preventing lively debate and differing opinions.December 28, 2008 at 11:51 pm #77518luvmuslgirlsParticipantBeen keeping my eye on this thread. Taking,and slightly changing, a quote from the movie "Contact". "This is the way it's been done for many years. Take small moves people, small moves."
December 29, 2008 at 9:05 am #77519MimiParticipant[font=tahoma][font=georgia]~Mimi[/font][/size”>[/font]
AuthorPosts- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.