Supergirl (CW Series)

Viewing 10 posts - 131 through 140 (of 211 total)
1 2 3 … 13 14 15 … 20 21 22
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 16, 2016 at 7:59 am #131893
    Bane Dorrance
    Participant

    I think the padding has moved a little down so it looks out of place. Maybe, and we can only hope, Melissa Benoist did hit the gym and she does have some size beneath that suit. One can dream, right?

    OMG!
    Pads did move according to current picture OR atleast shifted

    October 3, 2016 at 8:40 pm #132133
    Nick Furry
    Participant

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3749067/Don-t-call-Supergirl-20-things-need-know-DC-Comic-s-hottest-superhero.html

    October 14, 2016 at 11:13 pm #132234
    philip
    Participant

    I thought that the season two premiere guest starring Superman was pretty good. I felt it had more of a serious tone and not as silly as the first season.

    October 14, 2016 at 11:33 pm #132236
    Bane Dorrance
    Participant

    I thought that the season two premiere guest starring Superman was pretty good. I felt it had more of a serious tone and not as silly as the first season.

    Definitely serious tone just no MUSCLE tone,…guy playing Clark Kent/Superman is built like a swimmer not a farm boy
    Also Jimmy Olsen could totally dunk a basketball on CK…
    how are we suppose to believe that Jimmy looks up to a guy who he has to look down at to stare in the face
    ALMOST makes 1 forget about the “Whole TRying To Sleep With BEST FRIEND’s cousin”thing,…Almost!!

    March 12, 2017 at 12:06 am #134229
    Nick Furry
    Participant

    They sure have given her a lot of padding this season!!

    I guess they got a bigger budget this season. Time to invest in padding company.

    https://youtu.be/Lv1Dbfuyj98

    https://youtu.be/zlvhRtZmo7Q

    https://youtu.be/DAz2tJbxhZk

    March 12, 2017 at 8:46 pm #134236
    Nick Furry
    Participant

    Superman’s muscles are big but Supergirl’s aren’t, why is that?

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/superman/4005-1807/forums/supermans-muscles-are-big-but-supergirls-arent-why-1859379/#19

    March 12, 2017 at 10:40 pm #134237
    unkn0wnx
    Participant

    Because muscle in women is considered unattractive. The same reason heroines in movies are usually not even fit.

    March 13, 2017 at 3:57 pm #134239
    AlexG
    Keymaster

    Because muscle in women is considered unattractive. The same reason heroines in movies are usually not even fit.

    It’s a niche audience interest/attraction, that true. The ebb tide in TV/movies seems to have been the late 90s / early 2000s. I know what you mean, though. But it’s a misnomer to say that they’re not fit, at least by the mainstream standards of “fitness” in popular media.

    What you meant to say (**I think**) was that they’re not physically built-up to the level a Fitness, Physique or CrossFit athlete, which realistically speaking, would be what you would expect a woman to look like if she’s punching out, tossing around huge men that outweigh them by a factor of 2x / 3x. Suspension of disbelief – epic fail. It’s just not plausible to see an unathletic waif the size of some these petite actresses doing what they are doing in action or super heroine flicks.

    “I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
    ~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)

    March 14, 2017 at 1:19 am #134242
    unkn0wnx
    Participant

    Depend on the movie I guess. Hollywood never cared who they cast. They can cast an anorexic actress in the lead role beating up everyone.
    If you want proof look at women in MMA. Most are not very muscular but can beat up men twice their size. And they still don’t look like Taylor Swift.

    May 20, 2017 at 7:22 pm #135136
    Nick Furry
    Participant

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3t8J7LPMQM

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 131 through 140 (of 211 total)
1 2 3 … 13 14 15 … 20 21 22
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.