[Tigersan]

Hullo all

I would like to ask what do you think about my membership website http://www.female-power.net? I would like to improve it, not only the layout, but i mean mostly the content. Feel free to voice your opinion, im looking for honesty.

What is it that you would change in terms of content?
What is it that you would change when it comes to layout?
Would you be interested in seeing more 3d content?
(There will be more now, and better since we got a 3d camcorder now)

We will have shoots with women like Brigita Brezovac, and Alina Popa…
What other girls would you like to see?

Let me know afterall this website is for all musclelovers and i would like to hear your thoughts about it…

Thanks in advance and Best regards Tigersan

[Metal Bent]

Parhaps, make it free?

It was worth a shot.

[areaorion]

Here’s my 2 cents.
• The 3D content doesn’t do much for me. It’s kinda cool, but since you have such great photos & models, you don’t need a gimmick.

• How about an RSS enabled photo preview page with new pics a couple times a week. I think that’s what most of us cheap FBB fans really like. It also gives me something to Tweet about and send $$ your way.

• … and of course the OK to morph your awesome pics 🙂

[Tigersan]

Thanks for your ideas.

I’ll have to get my head around that RSS idea i vaguely know what it even is lol.

As for the morphs id say its up to our girls not me, I have a release form that states the material will be used strictly on our website, nowhere else, except promotional situations such as youtube…

BUT! i can ask them. Let me know which of our girls interests you and ill email them and ask 🙂 – no problem with that.

I appreciate your time and input! 🙂
Best regards Tigersan

[Tigersan]

Parhaps, make it free?

It was worth a shot.

Well thanks for your input, but im afraid its kinda unrealistic, given the fact I’m one of many “connective” links that allows to route some $$ from the fans to the models, fbb’s and other muscular girls. It has to be able to cover travel and lodging expenses and also make it worthwhille for me to keep bringing the content. That’s how it works and for that it has to be a paysite.

Best regards

[FlakBait]

Honesty huh? Never ask for my honest opinion unless you want it 😛

Having looked at your site it would be exceptionally hard for anyone who is not a member to give you any feedback when it comes to your content.

It seems that each of your models averages two photo galleries and 3 video clips. At $12.95 per month your site isn’t that expensive but given that muscleangels is $17.95 with substantially more content and daily updates, versus your once a week, it is difficult to see why I should choose your site over something like that for an extra $5.

Remove those empty boxes from the bodybuilders gallery on the models page it looks like either you coded something wrong or the galleries disappeared on you.

At this point 3D content is nothing but a gimmick. It does not appeal to anyone outside a very small niche market right now, especially online. I think your time money and effort would be better spent producing regular content with perhaps an occasional 3D project every now and then as an added bonus instead of making it a featured site category.

Your homepage needs to be redesigned. God knows how much I hate overly flash-ed websites that throw all kinds of crap at you and change colors and backgrounds every 2.5 seconds but you need something more then what you have. At the very least some sort of window with scrolling preview content, if they are clickable to the full size previews that’s even better. Also the text in that middle paragraph fades into that womans armpit, not good when you’re trying to look like a professional content site and not something simply setup by some dude over the weekend.

[Tigersan]

FlakBait wrote:

Honesty huh? Never ask for my honest opinion unless you want it 😛

Having looked at your site it would be exceptionally hard for anyone who is not a member to give you any feedback when it comes to your content.

It seems that each of your models averages two photo galleries and 3 video clips. At $12.95 per month your site isn’t that expensive but given that muscleangels is $17.95 with substantially more content and daily updates, versus your once a week, it is difficult to see why I should choose your site over something like that for an extra $5.

Remove those empty boxes from the bodybuilders gallery on the models page it looks like either you coded something wrong or the galleries disappeared on you.

At this point 3D content is nothing but a gimmick. It does not appeal to anyone outside a very small niche market right now, especially online. I think your time money and effort would be better spent producing regular content with perhaps an occasional 3D project every now and then as an added bonus instead of making it a featured site category.

Your homepage needs to be redesigned. God knows how much I hate overly flash-ed websites that throw all kinds of crap at you and change colors and backgrounds every 2.5 seconds but you need something more then what you have. At the very least some sort of window with scrolling preview content, if they are clickable to the full size previews that’s even better. Also the text in that middle paragraph fades into that womans armpit, not good when you’re trying to look like a professional content site and not something simply setup by some dude over the weekend.

Haha hey thats what i asked for and you delivered. Thanks for taking time to analyze…

However there are few things i have to relate to. Main difference is the Resolution of the photos on my site are ALOT bigger compared to any other.
So you can see them in almost full “straight from the camera” resolution.

Well i doubt theres any website able to compete with Muscle angels when a 3rd place Ms O. is the person getting in touch with models. Annie Riveccio makes it happen and she can get everywhere, backstage etc, hehe. So, no I’m not gonna compete with that in quantity departament, but i can in quality departament. And i think i am. The videos are abit larger but are ALOT more crispier. (except some of them that i tapes using smaller camcorder).

We update less often but more, 4 models a week vs 2 at MA. For now we can’t update more often simply because we need more content. My main concern was that we were concentrating on figure/fitness type too much and the website lacks more muscular models… what we all like 😛

3d, well for now we just put few pics up now and then and one clip here and there but there will be more in time. Personally i think some of those pics and vids are extremely stimulating 😀 (to me) thats why i thought some people might like it as well, especially with models like Katka or more muscular ones that we plan to feature in 3d soon, like Alina popa or Brigita Brezovac where there are big muscles to pop out in 3d hehe.

Just to be clear, I didnt write all that to start a discussion and state i disagree. I just needed to add some points to all that.

Once again thanks for taking time and writing… 🙂

[SweMu]

I wonder if I have the wrong 3d glasses. They are red and blue. I do see the 3d but god dayum does it hurt my eyes 😛

[topdogg17]

First and foremost, the site looks great! I wish I could say how the site could improve by the overall look of it, but I can’t right now.

The list of models you have are great and are only going to get bigger and better. Here’s a list of who I would like to see on the site one day:

Christine Pomponio-Pate
Juliana Malacarne
Kimmie Morgan
Joanna Wilson
Beth Watcher
Tiffany Procopio
Kisha Wilson
Tonya Burkhardt
Desere Guitard
Diana Stanback
Brittany Beede
Carla Guttierez
Tracy Bodner
Tiffany Ryan

And I’m hoping there’s a decent amount of muscle control clips (pec bouncing, bicep bouncing, and quad shaking are high on the list) on the site as time rolls on. I’m not asking to dominate the site with muscle control footage, but have it on the site from time to time. If you could get Christine P-P to do some pec bouncing, it would be a dream come true for me (and many others I’ve talked to).

Anyways, that’s just my take on it. Best of luck to you, and I hope this is only the beginning for you! 🙂

[cactusjoe]

I just noticed a little detail, the title of the web page is not always related to the model shown.

For exemple, Elisabeth Morales’ page is labeled Alica Kavuljakova. It’s the same for some others.

I must say that the quality of the content proposed is amazing. There is a kind of reality effect in your videos and pictures that I like a lot. Maybe it comes from the high definition camera you use. It’s a kind of signature of your work, compared to other web sites. 🙂

[Author]

Posts