[cpbell0033944]

<object width="700" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://backend.deviantart.com/embed/view.swf&quot; /><param name="flashvars" value="id=88999624&width=1337" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://backend.deviantart.com/embed/view.swf&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="700" flashvars="id=88999624&width=1337" height="385" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object>
<a href="http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/88999624/">Gemma Atkinson Muscle Morphs</a> by *<a class="u" href="http://lingster.deviantart.com/">Lingster</a&gt; on <a href="http://www.deviantart.com">deviant</a><a href="http://www.deviantart.com">ART</a&gt;

I fixed her!

Simply stunning, Lingster!  If only she really was that buff… ::)

[Deadly Pixxxie]

Gemma is perfectly fine as she is.

Nothing wrong with her.

She's good as is.

[Lingster]

Gemma is perfectly fine as she is.

Nothing wrong with her.

She's good as is.

I put about 20 pounds of muscle on her.  Maybe she'll see the result and hit the weights.

[Deadly Pixxxie]

I put about 20 pounds of muscle on her.  Maybe she'll see the result and hit the weights.

The woman already does fitness related stuff. She doesn't need 20 pounds of gorrammuscle on her. She's A GLAMOUR MODEL. THEY DON'T NEED EXCESS MUSCLE.

*draws a picture using some crayons*

See?

No need for it.

Not every woman has to be buff.

This is why a lot of us develop bad self-image problems.

[cpbell0033944]

I think I'll retire from this discussion.  I'm at risk of making myself very unpopular. ::)

[Deadly Pixxxie]

I think I'll retire from this discussion.  I'm at risk of making myself very unpopular. ::)

No, I'll just leave the board.

Because there's really no reason for me to be here. And my point -of-view is apparantly lost on just about everyone…so….yeah. See ya.

[cpbell0033944]

There's no need for you to leave.  I was rather over-anxious to keep the discussion OT.  We're a broad enough church to appreciate all shades of Amazon love.  However, your attitude to this thread seems hostile, especially when Yatz and Lingster posted Gemma Atkinson muscle morphs.  I understand that muscle isn't your thing, but there's no need to insult a morpher's work by likening it to "s******g on Da Vinci's original notebooks".  I'm sorry, but what sort of reaction do you seriously expect?  OK, you don't like muscle morphs – so what?  Do what I do when a member eulogises about a female bodybuilder who I consider to be a steroid victim – just don't comment.  Also, what was the meaning of accusing muscle morphers and those that like their work of helping to cause women's self-image problems?  Are the works of people like jdm really on a par with the populist magazines' obsession with the Victoria Beckhams and Nicole Ritchies of this world?  By accusing us of doing such a thing, you're effectively criticising all of those members who like female muscularity, which I would have thought must be a good 75% of us.

If Mimi and our moderators don't object, I'd be delighted to discuss the merits of the unmorphed chests of Ms Atkinson and several others here. Indeed, I had planned this evening to provide some images of the ample chest of Lucy Pinder.  I'm just not prepared to have a squabble, which is why I really am now going to shut the hell up and leave this discussion.

[Deadly Pixxxie]

There's no need for you to leave.  I was rather over-anxious to keep the discussion OT.  We're a broad enough church to appreciate all shades of Amazon love.  However, your attitude to this thread seems hostile, especially when Yatz and Lingster posted Gemma Atkinson muscle morphs.  I understand that muscle isn't your thing, but there's no need to insult a morpher's work by likening it to "s******g on Da Vinci's original notebooks".  I'm sorry, but what sort of reaction do you seriously expect?  OK, you don't like muscle morphs – so what?  Do what I do when a member eulogises about a female bodybuilder who I consider to be a steroid victim – just don't comment.  Also, what was the meaning of accusing muscle morphers and those that like their work of helping to cause women's self-image problems?  Are the works of people like jdm really on a par with the populist magazines' obsession with the Victoria Beckhams and Nicole Ritchies of this world?  By accusing us of doing such a thing, you're effectively criticising all of those members who like female muscularity, which I would have thought must be a good 75% of us.

If Mimi and our moderators don't object, I'd be delighted to discuss the merits of the unmorphed chests of Ms Atkinson and several others here. Indeed, I had planned this evening to provide some images of the ample chest of Lucy Pinder.  I'm just not prepared to have a squabble, which is why I really am now going to shut the hell up and leave this discussion.

No, there is a need for me to leave.

I don't belong here. Full stop.

Let me tell you a little something about not reading threads that don't interest me or not commenting: I do it 99.9999999999% of the time here. I'm into something that gets less and less and less coverage here, so why should I stay?

So, like I said…you guys go on and enjoy your thread. I'm out.

[cpbell0033944]

No, there is a need for me to leave.

I don't belong here. Full stop.

Let me tell you a little something about not reading threads that don't interest me or not commenting: I do it 99.9999999999% of the time here. I'm into something that gets less and less and less coverage here, so why should I stay?

So, like I said…you guys go on and enjoy your thread. I'm out.

OK, so you ignore most threads.  I sympathise that there aren't that many others here into the same things as you.  What I'm trying to say is that we can make this thread into one that you'll want to stay in.  It just doesn't help to start criticising muscle morphs because you don't like them.

[Mimi]

[font=times new roman]~Mimi[/size”>[/font]

[Author]

Posts