Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
cpbell0033944
Participantcpbell0033944
ParticipantSome new stuff!
Source – http://www.amg-lite.com/muscle_sensuality/

Hmmm, am I the only one who thinks her lower-body conditioning is a little off?
cpbell0033944
ParticipantI've never seen delts that striated! 😮
cpbell0033944
ParticipantNow that's ripped conditioning! 😮
cpbell0033944
ParticipantI must say that, whilst their physiques are awe-inspiring, I'm not much of a fan of either. Having said that, the posing and touching is hot!
cpbell0033944
ParticipantLove her expression! That diaphanous material contrasts well with her muscularity.
cpbell0033944
ParticipantAnother of Super Cindy – thonged! 😮 8)
Source: http://www.amg-lite.com/muscle_sensuality/
That's an old one as well – I wonder why there's little new material?
October 23, 2008 at 4:37 pm in reply to: Muscular Development Magazine considers eliminating FBBr coverage #77081cpbell0033944
ParticipantIn reply to Sammi:
1. Exactly. Judging women by malestandards is as ludicrous as if it were happening the other way around.
2. Yes, sadly they are, but the generally greater acceptance of buff women in the early-mid 1990s was, I think, partly stimulated by photogenic FBBers of that last era before the super-powerful steroids turned the top women into something most punters didn't want to see.
3. Some Figure competitors are big indeed, though I find fitness a bit uninteresting as it seems to me like gymnastics for grown-ups.
4. Women are getting bigger, but most seem to be getting fatter rather than stronger. If you look at slim girls on the street, most of them tend to be smaller, excepting the odd athletic girl.
5. I respectfully disagree. It could happen, of course, but, if marketed and regulated properly, FBBing should thrive, as it will no longer be subject to point 1.
6. I agree it must be about more than just size, and that more emphasis should be placed on posing routines.
7. Of course. Venues must be suitable, and this is another reason why I am convinced that FBBing will do better outside of the IFBB, as there wont be the temptation to shove the women out to some remote location away from the "main event" of the men's contest.
8. Again, I disagree. Trophies are awarded for podium finishers in motorsport and everyone knows what they mean.
9. Nice idea, but I doubt the IOC would be interested – in fact, I recall reading that the IFBB tried to get BBing included but were turned-down – ironically, one of the reasons was that new Olympic sports must have full gender equality, and the IFBB did not nclude the women's division in its application. AlexG will, I'm sure, be able to confirm.
10. I couldn't agree more. People have a justified cynical view of BBing, and separating the women's contests from the extremes of the men's events can only be a good thing.
cpbell0033944
ParticipantSweet peaks!! 😀
Double mmmmmmmm! ;D
cpbell0033944
ParticipantI'm glad someone else appreciates her! I wonder why she isn't better-known? 🙁
-
AuthorPosts

