cpbell0033944

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 2,181 through 2,190 (of 5,678 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Deanna Harvick #76451
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Gorgeous!  Thanks for spotting these. 8)

    in reply to: Britt Miller #26052
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Yes, that’s definitely something you don't see every day.  8)

    Source: http://www.unrealmuscle.com/forum/index.php/topic,11483.0.html

    Fracking heck!  WOOOOW!  I can ignore Britt no longer, she goes in my list forthwith. 8) ::) :-*

    in reply to: Alina Popa #76205
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Definitely looks better with the longer hair.

    Yes, absolutely, it makes her look much younger and prettier than the short hairstyle she had previously.

    in reply to: How To Date a Female Bodybuilder #76171
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    So bad and crummy it's actually hilarious.  I just, in the style of Mr T, pity the fool who falls for this claptrap.

    in reply to: 2008 MS OLYMPIA RESULTS #76526
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    You must admit though, that there seem to be odd decisions there every year.

    in reply to: Katrina and Raven pics on deviantART #76625
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    I love the catfight one.  Full of movement and energy, which is great for displaying femuscle. 8)

    in reply to: Brawna.org Changes #76486
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Well, I like it.  Good work Lingster. 😉

    in reply to: A New Laura Croft #74914
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Heh heh,

    The question isn't on the ability of the bodybuilder really.  It's more about the concept…

    For instance, if we use comics as an example.

    I think that heroes who only shoot fireballs and eye blasts from a distance, should be rather scrawny and not as muscular compared to a hero that fights hand to hand or has super strength.  This matches the concept of the character, which means that they are weak when up close but strong at a distance.

    It wouldn't make sense for Captain America to be scrawny since he's a hand to hand fighter with super strength.  Otherwise you get the "Supergirl" effect, a scrawny toothpick who can lift tanks.  Does that make much sense to you?

    So when Cpt Matt is talking about some characters not being an ideal fit for muscles, it just means that some characters or people just don't look right with an enormously muscular body.  Sometimes you can just tell by looking at someone's face that they wouldn't carry muscles well.

    For instance, I personally don't think Jennifer Aniston would look good with big muscles and I've seen the morphs done to give me an idea.  It just doesn't work for me, she's very attractive but she just doesn't seem the type that should have muscles.

    Lara Croft, she would look great as perhaps a figure competitor with a six pack of abs, well defined back, and arms, but she wouldn't be as good being beefy and massive, otherwise you expect her to lift boulders.  Which would be fine, but it'd be a totally different character.

    Muscles simply don't work for all, that's why you get some hideous "women" with muscles and you're like "Yikes…" where as other women it suits them better and they look perfect with massive size.

    Point understood. 8)

    in reply to: Mikayla Miles #76621
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Her experiences are fascinating and, at times, heartbreaking.  My only quibble with the article is that it seems to suggest that all men who are attracted to Amazons are as…extreme, let's say, in their feelings as "Don".

    in reply to: Cindy Phillips #31327
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Good to hear you're also a Cindy fan, Ozzy. 8)

    Also, I'm not going to get involved in the She-Hulk/Cindy stuff other than to remind everyone that this is a Cindy thread.

Viewing 10 posts - 2,181 through 2,190 (of 5,678 total)