cpbell0033944

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 3,241 through 3,250 (of 5,678 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Which do you like more… Pecs or bewbs ? [NSFW] #68501
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    In this instance, boobs are better as they are more attractive to more people.

    Personally, I'm undecided.  Like MuskelGroethe, I like a bit of bodyfat on my muscle chicks, so ultra-shredded anything isn't going to do it for me.  Certainly, striated pecs without any hint of boobage is too male-like for me; yet I'm not also usually a fan of huge implants either.

    in reply to: Kate Beckinsale morph #68551
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Good work! 8)

    in reply to: what started your growth fantasies? #57940
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    I am currently at the legal drinking age in the US of A. Which means I've been poisoning myself rotten here in the UK for 3 years. Legally.

    EDIT: Hmm, maybe I haven't known about some of those sites then since I was 12. Maybe 14/15.

    21 is still very young to me (I'm 27).  Also, I'm British, so the legal US age means little to me.

    in reply to: How to tell your Girlfriend/Fiancee/Wife about all this. #68071
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Success!!!  ;D …I think.

    Not sure if she realizes exatly how muscular or how broad my tastes are but, she's not opposed to my finding her strength and the possibility of her becoming stronger than me sexy as hell!

    Good news indeed! 8)

    in reply to: Re: Happy Birthday thread … #56154
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Thanks CP!!!

    Did you have a nice day?

    in reply to: Re: Happy Birthday thread … #56152
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Happy belated birthday (from yesterday) to ratlaf and jbird88! 8)

    in reply to: Re: She-Hulk Artwork Commissions #29264
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    That pic SCREAMS Cory Everson. Or the late, great Ms. Beattie.

    You're right – very Cory! 8)

    in reply to: what started your growth fantasies? #57938
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Hmm…I am unsure.

    The idea of someone getting stronger fascinated me when I was much younger. I remember watching cartoons or reading books where a character would suddenly acquire or develop huge amounts of strength and I would actually get turned on. At the time, I had no idea what was going on (I seem to remember thinking to myself 'why is my willy getting hard'…bit graphic, maybe, but a bit 'lol' all the same).

    At some unspecified point I started thinking/fantasizing about strong women. It may have been 'Hook', where Julia Roberts as Tinkerbell grabs Robin Williams and flies away with him (I remember asking my Dad how she got that strong heheh), but either way at some point it stopped being random feats of strength, and more female feats of strength.

    Then I hit puberty, got the internet, and everything branched off from there. Searching for 'strong women', got me websites about women who were mentally strong at first, but then I started finding websites that sort of had what I wanted, I think one of the first one I found was Diana the Valkyries site. At the time I was about 11, but after bit more surfing and searching, I learned of FBBs, Fitness Models, and eventually FMG and BE. I found Muscles of DeeKay not a huge amount of time after that, probably still 11, maybe 12, and have used that as my main resource since. In fact, I happened upon Transvigor via DeeKay.

    So there you have it. Useless information.

    Young man, you make me feel old!  I didn't use the internet until I was 18!  You can't be much older than that now, surely?

    in reply to: Re: She-Hulking #36009
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    The first image in FB's post is awesome! 8)

    in reply to: Britt Miller #26010
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    I looked over the issue the other day @ the local CVS store; the mag is still an oversized supplement catalog with achieved (fantasy) results by those who are obviously serious users of gear.

    Really, who do they think they're fooling?

    That said . . .

    Pro: Scanning over the article, in a nutshell, I'd have to say that it was a good, positive piece promoting feminine-looking female bodybuilding over that of the pharmaceutically induced kind.  As well as the "marketable" element to the general public who'd never consider that sort to be attractive, yet with someone like Britt (or Cindy Phillips for that matter, my insert) not only is desirous by men as a FBBing archetype, but that women (especially those concidering getting into lifting, my insert) would not be turned off, either.

    Con: I really could have done without the presence of an MBBr in the photo-op with Britt, preferring her pure and unadulterated, which I think is the case with 99.9% of us.  Please, the lady is awesome enough in her own right and can stand on her own physique merits without the need of such a prop.  Some respect is in order, afterall it is suppose to be an article about FBBing, not the male kind.

    Interesting that they felt the need to photo her with a man.  Surely they don't need to massage guy's egos by showing that many male BBers are bigger?

Viewing 10 posts - 3,241 through 3,250 (of 5,678 total)