[cpbell0033944]

Yeah, I think if you're working out as much as they seem to be – you can afford to eat more than a famine victim… to be honest, I never really rated any of these girls without muscles… so, no real loss but yes, it's definitely a case of them being scrawny as a whole that makes their muscle stand out… not very pretty muscle it has to be said.

But you'll notice, it's never said "Damn those skinny wretches."

The dangerously low bodyfat isn't thought-of as being problematic by society, unfortunately, but a woman daring to be anything other than a delicate, fragile, dependent flower…completely unacceptable.  Then again, attitudes do change with time; just consider society's attitude to childbirth – women were confined to bed for weeks after labour in the 19th century.  There's hope for a change, but it'll be gradual.

[cpbell0033944]

It's a great morph, but the level of muscularity is a little too high for my personal taste.  As I say though, it's great work. 😉

[cpbell0033944]

[color=navy][font=times new roman][size=11pt]That would be correct, BTX.  One of my most beloved icons of my youth.

XOXO’s

[size=14pt]~Mimi[/size]   

I feel so stupid – I should have recognised her. ::) :-[

[cpbell0033944]

I'm going to be criticised as being anti-American here, but can I make a point?

How can a country whose action movies contain the f-word in every sentence and have gratuitous violence all the time be so prudish about an attractie buff woman posing in quite conservative underwear?  Us Brits are teased by Americans as being sexually repressed, but isn't that a little hypopcritical in the light of this?

[cpbell0033944]

I was going to post a long, rambling response, but just add Fett's comment to Cashews' comment and you've got my opinion.  If these women had healthy bodyfat percentages (i.e around 15-20% which is ideal for women) you'd hardly see any muscle at all.  I think the giveaway is biceps.  Look at these women's arms, and the bicep looks like a length of rope.  We all know here that biceps should be round, full and ideally with a longitudinal split.  I'm convinced that half of what the idiot writer and the even bigger idiot personal trainers are calling muscle is actually tendons, ligaments etc.  I agree with the writer on one thing – they're not attractive, but, as Fett and Cashews have said, it's their bf %ages (possibly down around 10-12%) that is the problem.  Proper muscle and 18% fat and they'd look fantastic.

[cpbell0033944]

Some more of lovely Lindsay . . .  ;D  😮  8)

Source: http://www.amg-lite.com/lindsay_mulinazzi/

Nice stuff there – thanks Alex! 8)

[cpbell0033944]

Start bawlin', macho man.

Hell yeah! 😮 8)

[cpbell0033944]

What a great physique!

[cpbell0033944]

[color=navy][font=times new roman][size=11pt]Oh Alex darling…

I’m so sorry it took so long for me to reply to this, but thank you for yet another priceless contribution.  I was just thinking about WW the other day on my way home, and why she enamours me with the thrill and titillation of a teenager’s first love. 

Most of my fascination stems from the TV show, and the subsequent intrigue of power within a woman.  It’s the perfect blend of the sultry strength and “idol worship” that makes the heart beat just a tad harder and the soul craving for what it needs most.

Lovely… absolutely exquisite.

Peace and Love,

[size=14pt]~Mimi[/size]   

Mimi – I agree, but I've got to ask – who is the stunning lady in your new avatar? 😮 ??? 8)

[cpbell0033944]

Just to let everyone know – Mimi's back!  She's posted in the Wonder Wonan art thread.

[Author]

Posts