[cpbell0033944]

What a hottie – thank-you Alex; you're a diamond geezer, as a Londoner would say. 😉

[cpbell0033944]

It's her combination of wholesomeness (for a Brit like me she is the image of the all-American girl) with the Amazonic height and massive musculature that makes her so distinctive and so sexy.  Imposing is good. ;D 8)

[cpbell0033944]

Another rendering by the great one, Tom Burgos

Source: Fantastic 4 She-Hulk by Tom Burgos

Great to see quads on one of these pieces of artwork that properly compliment the upper body.

[cpbell0033944]

Seems to be a positive article wherein it concerns a femuscular archtype, which something of a rarity given that it's a mainstream newspaper.  Now if it was one from southern California or even Florida, that probably would be another matter.

It was the fact that it was from my otherwise dear Blighty that made me post it – femuscle isn't on our radar normally. >:(

[cpbell0033944]

God, politics.

Despite the politics (which I can't understand and I won't pretend to) I don't think something like that would really happen.

People seem to want to stifle any form of sexuality at all and say it's for kid's protection.
If parents were generally so worried of internet content their children might see, then for fuck's sake, don't let them go on the internet at all. There's plenty of other things they can do on a computer (games, kids programs etc) without looking on the internet.
Why would kids even want to be on the internet (I mean KIDS, not teenagers here)? When I was a kid I'd rather go outside and play or play on the Super Nintendo with my brothers.
That, and your kids are going to grow up and find out about sex and fetishes sooner or later anyway- if they find out on their own they can make their own descisions about it. Just because porn is THERE doesn't mean they will choose to look at it.

All the sexual repression seems to give people the idea that sex is something disgusting, it should be hidden and frowned upon- when it's a completely natural part of being a human being. It can't be healthy for the attitude that 'sex is bad' to be passed on to your kids.
I'm not saying show kids porn, I'm just saying it's totally stupid to hide things away and say sex is disgusting and a bad thing. Okay, there's some things out there on the internet that are nasty and you'd rather not have seen, but blocking ANY mature site? What if someone just wanted to learn about sex? I mean I never even knew what a clitoris was untill I was 15 and looked it up on the net, because subjects like that aren't talked about! That was even AFTER I lost my virginity because I had no idea what I was even doing. There's girls even my age who don't know they should even get any pleasure from sex!
It just pisses me off because people are so prudish about sex, it can't be healthy.

Jolly well said, Kulli!  If ever I need an articulate advocate for something, I'll know who to contact.

[cpbell0033944]

Interestin'.

I'm glad you think so, old bean – no-one else has been bothered to respond yet, so I'm grateful for anything!

[cpbell0033944]

Nice – very stylish!

[cpbell0033944]

Mad forearm vascularity! 😮

[cpbell0033944]

More proof politicians don't know how the internet works.

Just because you make a site sign up for "racy content" doesn't mean kids won't find it. And on top of that, how do you dictate the difference between a family friendly website with a forum that got trolled and had porn posted, or a "racy website"?

On top of that, we already HAVE ways added to browsers to keep kids from viewing mature websites.
IT'S PARENTAL CONTROLS.

Precisely – the parental responsibility side of this issue has, as usual, been ignored.

[cpbell0033944]

I like the Brooks version a lot!

[Author]

Posts