[Robert McNay]

chris10000 wrote:

why arent you members ??
for fans of fbb it is A MUST !!!

Because house and car payments are a little more important.

[Robert McNay]

Seldom wrote:

CptMatt wrote:

I just don’t get how doing something that demeaning to someone else is a turn on. I get S&M, because both are willing participants and deriving their own pleasure from it, but not that sort of stuff. :dry: :huh:

Pleasure derived from the idea of power and control and pain, either giving or receiving. The erotic imagination is vast and varied.

You’ve made the mistake of attributing the turn-on to the act itself, rather than the participants or the reader. It is not that torture is a turn-on. That would be attributing erotic attributes to the torture. It is that the fantasy of torture can be a turn-on to the reader. It is an attribute of the reader’s erotic imagination, not the act itself.

This is an important distinction to make. When you think that eroticism is inherent in the imaginary act rather than the participants, you are dangerously close to then moving from that to a judgment on those who find it erotic. Those with torture fantasies then become weird, perverted, the other, and must be punished and fixed.

A better phrasing is that the torture scene is not erotic to you. The implied question in your phrasing was “How can imaginary nonconsensual torture be erotic?” The answer, of course, is that to you it cannot be erotic.

Either way, I suspect those that do, probably tortured small animals as kids.

[Robert McNay]

The Highlander wrote:

Bah, why would anyone drink that rubbish. You lot should get yourselves some REAL whisky, like a nice 10 year old single malt.

I’m not a drinker, but I’ve seen that my family’s clan makes one, MacGregor.

[Robert McNay]

Ashlee wrote:

sorry I could not get that far ,very sorry if it offended you

I’m sorry Ashlee, I wasn’t addressing it or blaming you. It was just a comment on the story, itself. I usually try to avoid that sort of manga and manga-inspired art. In the case of this, after the second page of it, I started to “next” my way through it quicker. :blush:

I just don’t get how doing something that demeaning to someone else is a turn on. I get S&M, because both are willing participants and deriving their own pleasure from it, but not that sort of stuff. :dry: :huh:

[Robert McNay]

The fighting sequences were cool, even the “ahem” intimate panels, but I could have done without the kinky torture stuff. Gross. :S

[Robert McNay]

GWHH wrote:

Photos From Her Cross Country Trip July 2010

She’s a better person than me. I know its totally safe, but I just can’t bring myself to step out on that glass porch, 102 stories up, in the Sears Tower (Willis Tower, thrrrrpt!). :woohoo: :blink:

(channeling Bush the 1st) Nope, ain’t gonna happen.

[Robert McNay]

GWHH wrote:

Got this off the slate.com website a while ago. Thought I post it. He pretty buff and she just plain drop dead pretty! A neat little photos from days gone by!

A very funny actress, too (Will Success Spoil Rock Hudson? & A Guide for the Married Man).

Such a sad fate at too young an age. Even sadder that her daughter witnessed her death. 🙁

[Robert McNay]

Maitolasi wrote:

FlakBait wrote:

She’s a very beautiful woman….but needs to back off the peroxide a little

no no no no NO NO…

Yes, yes, yes, yes……….

Nothing worse than brassy, fake blonde hair. Usually women who do this look better as brunettes.

Beside, that crap follows the roots into your head and does nasty s**t to your brain. Look at what happened to Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan. :woohoo: 🙂

[Robert McNay]

Too bad you already posted a link to the article. I would be curious to see how the male members of this site would have voted, if you you had posted the pic with a poll.

I’m betting the one on the right would’ve won. 😉

[Robert McNay]

Rats! And I don’t get HBO. :angry: 🙁

[Author]

Posts