[Robert McNay]

If not muscular, I'll take juicy curves, full hips and shapely thighs over a bag of bones all week and twice on a Sunday. 8)  I presume from CaptMatt's post that she isn't talented especially, but never mind. 😉

Not really. She's one of those Paris Hilton, Nicole Ritchie cadre'. They are famous because of a name or association. In Kim's case, her dad was one of OJ Simpson's lawyer, her stepdad is Bruce Jenner.

Her biggest claim to fame, right now, is that she stars in a reality (or what passes for reality these days) TV show called "Keeping Up with The Kardashians". Its mostly a venue to show just how spoiled her and her sisters are.

[Robert McNay]

As far as the Celebrity-because-they-are-a-celebrity bimbos go, I have to agree Kim is definitely very, very pretty. Her parents bought her a pretty amazing and nicely done rack.  ;D

The modicum of abs definition is nice, too. It shows that she does take care of herself.

[Robert McNay]

With me, it all depends on the "whole package". No, I don't like it when they lose their femininity (i.e. Colette Guimond) but they can still be big and attractive (i.e. Tina Lockwood).

I also tend to find female bodybuilders more attractive in their non-contest shape. When they pare down, I don't like how their faces hollow out and you start to see the tendons in their cheeks and jaws. Colette Nelson is a good example of this. Off contest, she has a beautiful face and astounding eyes. Contest weight, her eyes seem to sink and look like the eyes of a skeleton head and you can see every detail of anatomy under the skin. Defined tendons in a cheek are just not attractive.

It also tends to take away the natural hourglass shape of a woman's body.

[Robert McNay]

Colette's putting a nice little acting resume together:

Order of the Serpentine
Flex and the City
McCain Girl

Yeah, its right up there with Traci Lords and Sandal Bergman

[Robert McNay]

Hmmm, I have a hardbound copy. I wonder how much it's worth?

[Robert McNay]

I've never met a female body builder, so I'm not sure how I'd feel. Then again, at 5'11", 235lbs, I'm not exactly a small or thin guy.  ;D

[Robert McNay]

Ah. I'm seeing a trend here.

The elders/well-known folks are against it.

The n00bs are all "get over it, it satisfies a fetish".

Well, unfortunately, not everyone's into FMG/GTS with blatant sexual overtones. I know I'm not. If the main character ends up having sex, so be it….but I don't want to hear about her "heaving breasts and throbbing clit". That's just gross.

*shrugs*

Maybe I'm a prude. I don't know. But I'm not down on all the XXX rated stuff in these stories…..and this is coming from someone with XXX in her name.

Ms. Pixxxie, can I ask a clarification?

Are you objecting to a story having a sexual content? Or the nature of that content (heaving, throbbing, thrusting whatever, etc)? What is your feeling if a writer attempts it on a tasteful level that emphasizes the passion/pleasure, rather than the act or mechanics of it?

[Robert McNay]

Now that's funny. Muppets Gone Wrong.  😀

[Robert McNay]

Oh, BTW, I'm neither a virgin or a basement dweller, I have a whole house to myself. But my computers are in the basement. 😀

[Robert McNay]

What's with the new trend of every story in the Growth section having blatantly graphic sexual overtones?

It's getting to be a little old, to be honest.

And it's making me wonder just how many virgins/basement dwellers are lurking on this site.

:-X

I wonder if I may be at fault for it. The stories posted to the site used to be pretty straightforward about muscles, strength or growth. Then I posted the first Craig & Lillyia vampire story where he tries to seduce her but she turns the tables on him. I got a few good comments and it wasn't pulled by the powers-that-be.

That may have been all it took. If so, I'm sorry.  :-[

[Author]

Posts