Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
David C. Matthews
ParticipantExcellent work!
David C. Matthews
Participanta somewhat oxygenated cranial cavity
In other words, an "airhead"?

Nice, nice drawing. (but then, your drawings always are!)
David C. Matthews
ParticipantThe picture's changed… now it's Marja Lehtonen.
Not that I'm complaining at all, mind you…
[royorbison]Rrrrroowwwww[/royorbison]
David C. Matthews
ParticipantAssuming that your question wasn't rhetorical
Mm, well, it wasn't really "rhetorical" as such, but I wasn't actually expecting any answers, so this is nice 🙂
and because you've long turned off the response feature on your blog, I'll have to answer over here . . . 😉
That was a decision I'd agonized over… but if you'd read the comments on the last few posts on which I allowed comments, you probably understand why I turned them off. I do miss the positive feedback; and I like to think I'm not so delicate and thin-skinned that I can't take some constructive criticism. But when fully a quarter of the posts begin to all be variations on the same sentiment – "Why aren't you cranking these out faster, goddam you!" without even a word about whether or not the commenter was enjoying what I was doing… Well, it got to where it wasn't fun to read the comments anymore, having to sift through the trolls to get to the good posts.
I do have the options, if I decide to reinstate comments, of limiting commenting to registered members only and/or word verification, in order to put up one or two more hoops for trolls to have to jump through if they want to leave comments whose only purpose is to irritate me. The trouble is, it also makes people I want to hear from jump through those same hoops. 😐
Just as a side bar, I would have preferred (if only for its humor value) Winston to have exclaimed D'OH . . . 😀
Damn, that would've been good! Wish I had thought of that!!
(Incidentally, the reason I didn't post my own notice about Page 13 was that I didn't think there was enough going on on the page to warrant a separate notice here. Happy to be mistaken in that regard…)
David C. Matthews
Participant
WONDERFUL image!!
David C. Matthews
ParticipantI do remember this show being the subject of a previous post, though whether here or at Wreck Shop I don't recall. But it is time for a reminder… and I'm sure there are members here for whom this will be new information.
*snerk* Getting actresses who look as strong as the characters are supposed to be was one of the few things this show got right!
April 11, 2006 at 8:23 am in reply to: THE LATEST BOUT THE COVE…and my absence for the past month #26294David C. Matthews
ParticipantLet me add my congratulations, and thanks for the kind words about the Tetsuko pic.
David C. Matthews
ParticipantI've got this magazine somewhere in my stacks o' stuff… nice to reread it.
There's a special knack to telling a story in only 3 pages (which I wish I had!)
April 9, 2006 at 7:18 am in reply to: Carmen – in dynamic clothing – finally found some clothes for my girls ;P #26237David C. Matthews
ParticipantOoh, that's nice!!
April 8, 2006 at 7:18 am in reply to: Re: Gettar82: Hi everybody and my artworks (old, for now) #25180David C. Matthews
Participant…and to return to the topic:
LOVE that She-Hulk drawing!!
-
AuthorPosts