IMHO your opening statement was malicious defamation:
Jd is not natural, she takes steriods. Claiming to be "natural" is laughable.
Of course everyone is entitled to their own opinion – but you present this like a statement of fact when actually, your 'evidence' is no more than the second hand opinions from steroid users who have a vested interest in smearing natural athletes.
The facts are: Hard exercise and good nutrition build muscle. Certain drugs help build muscle but often produce unwanted side effects. Johanna has no side effects and has tested negative for banned substances many times over a 10 year period. In addition Johanna has staked her reputation on being natural and has no reason to lie since drugs are widely accepted in the sport.
We agreed testing is not perfect – but a number of athletes *have* tested positive at Johanna's competitions over the years. Therefore by submitting herself to those tests for over 10 years, there is at least *some* likelyhood that Jo actually is natural.
Another piece of evidence I would add: slow rate of change. Jo's build hasn't changed dramatically since she first appeared on the scene. She just slowly improves each year. Again, this is consistent with natural training. Unlike some girls who add a massive amount of muscle in a few short years.
I dont understand how I am smug; I said before that IF I am wrong, I would happily take back my statements.
By your own admission there is nothing J can do to prove she is natural – so clearly you will never take back your statements.
I did no side-stepping
Fortunately you side stepped the motive question to save us from more baseless accusations and character slurs. Thanks for that.
To justify your allegations you'd need to produce either:
a) a visible side effect
b) a positive test result.
You have neither which makes your allegations baseless malicious defamation. Please lets not hear any more of your BS in this thread.
