Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Joe DoomskyParticipant
Well, actually, yep, too much muscle indeed. Totally creates visual dissonance. SG has to be more of a lightweight, nimble and fast silhouette. Not to say she shouldn’t have any muscle at all. It’s just IMO she’d have to look more like a fitness competitor, not full-fledged bodybuilder.
Joe DoomskyParticipantJoe DoomskyParticipantJoe DoomskyParticipantJoe DoomskyParticipantJoe DoomskyParticipantAs soon as person gets public, this person should be ready to receive negative backlash. Considering level of social controversy in each case, this backlash can be higher or lower. Extremely muscular women are on the ‘more controversial’ part of the spectrum, for there are actual concerns about effects of intensive (and especially drug-supported) bodybuilding and also there are some natural mechanisms of visual evaluation of other humans. While we here do love to see girls with some meat on their bones, it’s actually a deviation from statistical norm. Considering all said above and also considering absolutely the same reaction aimed and each first female bodybuilder to pop up more visible in the Internet all I can say is – what’d she expect? It’s like putting out a picture of Obama raping sheep on weloveobama.com or to draw a caricature on Muhammad. Results will be the same, it will only push different social buttons for different amounts of people in different places and circumstances. Just remember recent GamerGate history. It’s all of the same root. And I highly doubt it can actually be removed for it’s nothing but natural human reaction on something those people find atrocious for one reason or another. Thus, I repeat, as soon as person gets public, this person should be ready to receive negative backlash.
Joe DoomskyParticipantJoe DoomskyParticipantJoe DoomskyParticipantJoe DoomskyParticipant -
AuthorPosts