[Lingster]

Mimi wrote:

Lingster,

Do we users have the option to change the way our fonts appear? I’m a font girl… just curious.

Thanks, honey. :kiss:

~Mimi

Sorry, but nope. I don’t think it’s offered under this forum architecture.

[Lingster]

Jersey Shore. :angry:

[Lingster]

Another really nice thing about the new site features is that I can unfriend you.

[Lingster]

I think that’s Dorothy Herndon playing the blacksmith in the Bill Paxton video. She doesn’t really sell it.

[Lingster]

Maitolasi wrote:

Not this shit again… neverending rant.

It’s a forum. Never-ending rants are the idea.

[Lingster]

My take: In the 80s, women’s bodybuilding was avant garde. Mapplethorpe’s Lady, Lisa Lyon book was as responsible for this as anything. Gender-blending was new and hot, on both ends of the continuum. Women’s bodybuilding quickly passed into the mainstream because a lot of men like the athletic look or are sexual submissives, and this was a sexy, new expression of that. A lot of women also like the muscle look, usually for the opposite reason, and it was fashionable, as well.

When a person has a single trait that is associated with the opposite sex, they usually still ‘print’ as their birth gender. When a person has several traits that are associated with the opposing gender, others become confused and most do not find it attractive.

So when Cory Everson showed off big muscles, her other feminine characteristics shone through. When later bodybuilders showed off even bigger muscles, but were also more striated, had deep voices, coarse skin, more body and facial hair, the wheels came off. Female bodybuilding competitions went from being nearly as popular as male contests – featured on ESPN during prime time – to being fringe affairs.

[Lingster]

cpbell0033944 wrote:

Might there have been some technique defecit there?

Technique defect but also don’t forget that women tend to have more slender bone and joint structure. It’s generally easier to twist a woman’s hand and wrist than a man of equal size.

[Lingster]

stevexyz wrote:

Is it OK to mention here some items I want to sell, namely, the original commission drawings on my Angel Eyes Comicartfans site that I had done by the LH Art artists?
If it is against policy, please remove this post.
But if it is not, is anyone interested in the SUPER CATHY and other LH Art originals?

Yeah, it’s OK, but just the one mention.

[Lingster]

KissTheManiac wrote:

Personally I feel that having a subcategory in the Female Muscle board dedicated to just process would do nicely.

I’m actually looking for an excuse to do a BuddyPress installation. 🙂

[Lingster]

KissTheManiac wrote:

It’s just the way the Process forums function. A good majority of the members there abhor FMG of any kind and some to the point that they’re very vocal about it. So don’t really expect or even hope to see any respectable amount of muscle in any of the giantess club comics. BE story club is kind of the same way, they have some stories advertising muscle growth when it’s really only just being described in text or Portal draws it and his idea of muscle is far from being satisfactory here. So my say would just be to let it go and leave giantess club to sink and drown in it’s own pool of infrequent updates and unsatisfactory content.

That’s exactly true abt Process Forum. I like that forum a lot, but I don’t go there to promote FMG. It is what it is.

Would people want me to launch a FMG-themed growth forum in addition to Amaz0ns? I still have the SheGrew.com domain… I’d need moderators, though.

[Author]

Posts