[luvmuslgirls]

WOW! Those were really cool! Thanks! :cheer:

[luvmuslgirls]

AlexG wrote:

By Joseph Mackie – his She-Hulkies are always firm, filled out and fully packed. :blink: :woohoo: B)

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270621883518

Right! And that’s the way she should be! Jen Walters is supposed to grow grOW GROW! Tired of seeing all these slim, big boobed, non-muscled versions. To me, that’s not the She-Hulk.

[luvmuslgirls]

NO!

[luvmuslgirls]

To say she is looking mighty fine is putting it lightly, IMO. 🙂 She is looking MIGHTY! I would say. Mighty muscles bulging, mighty veins bulging! :woohoo: “She is just MIGHTY MIGHTY and letting it all hang out! Cause she’s a Brick House!”
Have to sing!

[luvmuslgirls]

Yeah, sorry about my over analyzing. I just am that way. But I agree with on what’s been said about when someone posts “muscular women” and it turns out not to be the case. After you been on this site awhile, you get to know the members responsible for misrepresenting , or at least, exaggerating their posts.

[luvmuslgirls]

Really really fantastic! Better and better! Hope a movie come around soon! :woohoo:

[luvmuslgirls]

Reason wrote:

If only! Just think of all the Amazonian alien races that would have been attracted to our planet if that had been the message!

On the other hand, if there were such extraterrestrial races, maybe they would be coming anyway. “Must realign planet from straying to far toward patriarchal domination”. 😆

[luvmuslgirls]

Somewhat interesting but nothing on any muscle females. Transformation or otherwise. Of course. 🙁

[luvmuslgirls]

the_collector_2 wrote:

Let’s clear some definitions up, because it pisses me off when people get it wrong and I go in expecting more than what I got.

This would be defined as RIPPED:

http://heidivuorela.blogg.se/

This would be defined as BUFF:

http://amg-lite.com/?view=http://www.amgprofiles.com/DianaT/Pics/Diana1104.jpg

This would be defined as MUSCULAR:

http://amg-lite.com/?view=http://www.amgprofiles.com/Lindsay/Pics/Lindsay1201.jpg

This would be defined as HUGE (for mainstream standards anyway):

http://www.female-bodybuilders.org/sissel-lyngvaer/

Hillary Swank would currently be defined as FIT:

So the proper definition is FIT.

Collector? I agree with you and Solarian. Although I think you stretched your point a little thin and simplistic. For example, the RIPPED and MUSCULAR pics are just that. it could be said they are both in ripped and muscular shape. Meaning low and very low bodyfat. Extreme muscle definition. The HUGE model fits this category also.
Actually, I would have selected a woman such as Julie Bourassa as an example of huge. http://amg-lite.com/?view=http://www.amgprofiles.com/JulieB/Pics/Julie0005.jpg

All in all, Hillary Swank isn’t more than a LITTLE muscle and mostly Hollywood skin and bones. Look at those knobby knees and elbows. In the movie, Million Dollar Baby, she was looking good, but not really ripped.

[luvmuslgirls]

cray17 wrote:

Hey thanks for the news! I haven’t bothered to check out any WWE since the Diva’s seem to be going the skinny route again. :dry: I don’t watch wrestling since my man Stone Cold Steve Austin left the scene. 🙁 It’s just not the same anymore. But, I’ll have to watch out for the Diva’s again. :cheer:

[Author]

Posts