Number6

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 141 through 150 (of 350 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wonder Woman Artwork Commissions #41719
    Number6
    Participant

    I thought Mimi's avatar was of Kim Kardashian?  (Please don't hurt me too much if I'm wrong, Mimi…  :-[)

    Well either way, both the avatar and the drawing are gorgeous!

    in reply to: Jennifer Garner morph… #74881
    Number6
    Participant

    Not too shabby…I like that she's also seemed to have gotten a height increase, too.

    Good start, and keep on morphing!

    in reply to: Colette Nelson – Incredible McCain Girl #71762
    Number6
    Participant

    I don't see Colette's role in these spots as alienating an audience based on political party loyalties.  For instance, just because Will Ferrel mockingly portrayed G.W. Bush on SNL doesn't mean that people base their enjoyment of his movies based on whether they are Republican or Democrat (I'm not sure *what* they base their enjoyment of Will Ferrel movies on, but that's a whole other discussion).

    In the meantime, anyone who watches these "Obama Girl Vs. McCain Girl" videos will see her, and at the very least will probably enjoy the humor in the situation…and if she gains some more fans in the process (detractors can be easily ignored, after all), so much the better for her.  And for existing femuscle fans, there's at least this extra little bit of content to enjoy/drool over.  😉

    in reply to: Wonder Woman cartoon movie coming to dvd #74145
    Number6
    Participant

    I'll do you one better…check out the trailer:

    http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1810036252/video/9069426

    in reply to: Breast Expansion? #73762
    Number6
    Participant

    Can't believe I missed this topic for so long!  I should almost turn in my BEArchive membership card…though they don't make any…and even if they did make them, I probably wouldn't have one since I don't generally broadcast those personal details in real life…I should really get on topic now…   😛

    I'm in general agreement about the growth aspect being key; and while I don't presume to speak for those who read or write either the BE or FMG genres, I would say that the two areas are distinct, yet closely related.  In most BE fiction, the boob growth could be seen as a metaphor for gaining sexual confidence–the timid, flat-chested girl is suddenly hotter than all the babes and can score with the guy she's always wanted but could never get up the nerve to talk to, that sort of thing.  Whereas in FMG fiction, the muscle growth seems more about physical confidence–the weak girl can finally outmatch her tormentors, have her way with whoever she wants despite their protests, that sort of thing.  As a result, it's fairly easy to combine the two within a story, as a way of demonstrating the girl(s) gaining confidence/realizing their sexual desirability/etc.  Again, it's not always the case but the metaphor does seem appropriate in most cases (then again, in many cases I read those stories for the BE and/or FMG rather than the metaphor  ;D)

    As you can probably tell, I like both genres rather well for fantasy purposes, but of course reality's different when it comes to attractive women (in the psychological/emotional sense…that is, the sort of person I want to spend time with, which is a completely separate consideration from the women I find physically appealing).  A woman I find attractive will get a, uh, "certain response" out of me even if she doesn't fall within a particular physical "standard", and I'm sure the same is true for many other guys.  So go ahead and sculpt your body to be as muscular or as powerful (or however else) you like…just be true to yourself and I'm sure that you'll find other people will be attracted to you, in which case they'll probably be more than happy to worship your physique.   😉

    in reply to: Episode VII: Revenge of the Growing Female Jedi (NSFW) #74201
    Number6
    Participant

    The Force is strong with this one!  ;D

    Keep up the good work!

    in reply to: Women in Combat – opinions please #74167
    Number6
    Participant

    I DO, however, object to…:

    2.  The way in which they state that a "real man" would not let a woman he cares for serve in the military.  By extension, the only "real men" are conservative Christians.  As a liberal agnostic, therefore, I am apparently not a "real man".  I take great offence over this.  Again, my logic and principles mean that I support their right to tell me that I am not a real man, but I cannot stop my heckles from rising.  In all honesty, the flippant side to my character says that, if they are real men, then I am glad that I am a "feminised man".

    I've seen this one before; it's common to many arguments used by religious Christians (and probably lots of other people–religious or otherwise–too), and it's a logical fallacy…I can't remember the proper name for it, but I remember it colloquially being called the "True Scotsman" fallacy.  Goes something like:

    Person 1: Scotsmen don't eat porridge.
    Person 2: My good friend Angus is from Scotland, and I've seen him eat porridge.
    Person 1: Ah, but no TRUE Scotsman would eat porridge.

    Basically, it's a way to take a correct definition (a person from Scotland is Scottish), and by making a particular modification to that definition, create a new definition that is claimed to be a "truer" definition (in this case, the "true" Scotsman is from Scotland AND doesn't eat porridge).  As you noted, it's used to make some new, arbitrary definition that they've created seem somehow more desirable (or "more correct") than the actual, correct definition.
    And also as you noted, many of the statements on those sites made claims with little to no supporting evidence or arguments (not outside Bible quotations, anyway); while the counterpoints made in this thread do.
    My advice (not that you asked for any  :P): the people that wrote the articles at those sites are not worth the effort of raising your hackles…most of their arguments would boil down to "things should be this particular way because that feels 'right' to us"…as you've said, they have every right to express that; but for me I find it's easiest to exercise my own right to ignore their speechifying (and feel free to do the same to me, I have a tendency to ramble on sometimes).

    in reply to: Dara Torres #72492
    Number6
    Participant

    😮  Noice!

    (The extra "o" is for "omg that's GREAT!")  ;D

    in reply to: Selma Blair morph #74095
    Number6
    Participant

    Well, maybe being bony and virtually flat-chested is simply nature's way of challenging morphers to put some meat on their frames.  😉

    As for this morph, it's great!  I think there's a realistic addition of muscle mass for her frame, and while the dress does look like a grey sack, I think it works in this case…it's properly draped over her enhanced pecs, and while the rest of it is still shapeless, that very characteristic allows it to easily sustain the illusion of her morphed physique.

    Well done, keep up the good work!

    in reply to: NEW MMORPG! #73850
    Number6
    Participant

    I'm definitely going to check this out…when I have more time…and money…*sigh*  :-[

    Thanks for the heads-up, though…I'll be making sure that the next computer I get (with that elusive money stuff) meets the system requirements for this game.  🙂

Viewing 10 posts - 141 through 150 (of 350 total)