Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
phenomsParticipantHoliday wrote:
She looks familiar, but not she could look like any blonde actress from any old TV show.
Maybe she’s Baelyn Neff. Or Sandra Hess.
Thank you for trying to name her but I compared pictures of both and neither fits the bill.
I remember Sandra from that Airforce themed tv show she was in. Something Wings of Gold I think but don’t feel like looking it up on imdb. I never heard of the other until your post though.
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantWow on timing of this post. I think Riece has had the first 4 episodes up for about a week or two. I only visited the site yesterday to watch it and then made my first post. Now only a day later they have posted release dates for 6 more episodes.
Hopefully Sharon will have many more scenes in sleeveless outfits. 😆
AlexG wrote:
And she’ll be back to Stargate again in 2011 in Stargate: Extinction B)
Gotta love imdb. Is that the first Atlantis movie? Or at least the first Atlantis straight to video movie?
FlakBait wrote:
That’s assuming it will be released. The bottom falling out of the direct-to-dvd movie market has put it and the remaining SG-1 movies into uncertainty. Last I heard the producers are still trying to convince the studios to release them through another means.
Well fortunately the whole Stargate franchise is enormous and has a significant fanbase. The avenues of distribution are always changing. The dilemma is less so in the changing than it is in the sheer number of options for distribution since each avenue entails production and marketing costs. They need to figure out how to get the best return on their investment.
I vote Hulu as one avenue since for the moment they have figured out 3 key advantages. They have figured out how to block flash downloads, that lets them force commercials on us that we cannot fast-forward through, and they can leave stuff up as long as they want.
GWHH wrote:
very nice job on the screen shots
Thanks. 🙂 And me without my photoshop! I am stuck using Paint.NET for now.
BlackKusanagi wrote:
She isnt bad.
Well shes a very attractive actress. Not enough muscle to be relevant to this board, but she has clearly gotten very fit and toned, and does have more muscle than the average woman.
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantBrowsing through imdb, I stumbled on a picture of a very pretty blonde with actor Esai Morales. His name is in the caption but hers is not. I’m thinking she might be an actress and that I should know her, but that is only a feeling.
Since she isn’t muscular, this doesn’t belong in the Whos that musclebabe thread. So this seemed as good a place to put it as any.
Does anyone know who she is?
This is the pic on imdb
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1052088320/nm0005246Cropped Headshot

Full Body

Imageshack Uploads of original and cropped pics
http://img577.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=unknownblondewithesai2.pngMy Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantEssey wrote:
You sure it’s mindi? it doesn’t look like her to me…
Ditto. Me Neither. Mindy looks all around different, is much more muscular, and started young which means this could not be an earlier picture.
Something about her arm looks off too. Like it’s been photoshopped. My first thought was that its a frankensteined pic. But then her fist and back (muscle thru mesh) made me reconsider. But the bicep does not appear countered by the tricep and the tricep is small by comparison. Also, the forearm looks blurry and smudged.
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantThis is something I’ve been wrestling with to myself and it finally boiled over enough to verbalize it. I feel really unresolved still, but am trying to think it through. Feedback often helps.
I know that there are some people that will take their negative energy and channel it into physical activity. That works for them and must be awesome that they can do that. I know that I did a variation of that a long time ago that whenever I was feeling pooped for no good reason, instead of plopping down doing nothing, I used the same time I’d have spent retreating to go to the gym.
Most of the time it helped, but I also had my motivation then too.
Right now I’m in several states of transition with different things happening in my life and already feel like my plate is too full.
In a way, I know the gym I have to go to here was something I looked forward to at a point. I did not view it as a chore, but as an escape.
That’s really how I felt about it. Positive. Not as a positive spin, because there was no spin there. It was a positive experience because I could feel proud of myself for what I put into it, and I enjoyed the people.
Hm… well wonders never cease I guess. Thinking things through and putting things to words still surprises me in what can come from it. That was very encouraging right there.
Ok, well this is not only a good start, but it falls within the premise of having internal motivators rather than external.
I don’t think I’m done with this yet, but it just took a 180 degree turn for the better. Now if I can just amp that up enough to capitalize on it.
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantI have people to workout with. I have never liked using reasons outside of yourself as reasons for motivation, but it seems like that is part of it in this case.
By reasons outside of yourself, I mean like I had a g/f that quit smoking for me. I insisted that she shouldn’t be quitting for me but for herself. Doing it for herself she was more likely to stick with it long term.
So by the same token, I *should* have enough motivation from internal reasons. Need to shake loose this apathy.
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantSo I’ve not been active here in a pretty long time. Lingster completely revamped the whole site since my last participation.
I wanted to identify an actress (done), and naturally looked at other stuff, some which was already on my radar like Brittany Beede.
Prior to posting my actress question, I looked through the “Who’s this Musclebabe” thread and stumbled upon several mentions of MzDevious.
I did a search and found a thread dedicated to her at Unrealmuscle’s forum and have been slowly working my way through it. I’ve made it as far as page 10 out of what appears to be 12?
Anyhow, she’s super hot, and apparently tiny, like 4’10”. She’s into some things that I’ve no knowledge or interest in like femdom and seems to write rather harsh sounding profiles, but then she has posts in the thread where she comes across as likable and humorous.
I came across 2 things that made me laugh…
“in my second life I wish to be tall enough to not have to scale the shelves at the supermarket like spiderman so that I may reach the green beans.”
That I can relate to though not to the same extreme. And…
“as for the ball kicking.. us ladies do not get it either. but man is there a demand for those clips ,and it’s kinda fun , cause no matter how hard you kick, he is super happy.”
As creeped out as I should be, the way she phrased it with the “he is super happy” instead made me laugh. Actually, it’s still making me laugh.
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantthe_collector_2 wrote:
Well either way you owe me 100 bucks for getting it right regardless. 😛
Yup, you got it right.
the_collector_2 wrote:
When the movie comes out I would be willing to be $100 dollars that it’s her.
Let’s exercise more logic, shall we? (That’s a rhetorical question by the way to which the answer is “Yes.”) Namely some good ‘ol semantics!
You said *when* the movie comes out… its not out yet… you *would* be willing to bet…
All you had to say was: “I bet you $100 that when the movie comes out that the actress you are asking about is Betsy Russell.”
Of course I’d still need to accept your bet. Otherwise I would be the richest man in the world. How? Observe…
“I bet all the billionaires and multi-billionaires in the world that if they all give me outright, all their money, assets, and legal profitable holdings, that I would be the richest man in the world that is not subject to blind bets by others seeking to attain my wealth through similar tactics as this bet.”
On your premise that a bet is automatically accepted upon declaration by the originator of the bet, I must be pretty stinkin’ rich right now… too bad your semantics didn’t hold up to basic scrutiny… I apparently could have afforded to pay up.
On that note…
“I bet The_Collector_2 $1000 that he won’t be challenging my logical prowess anytime soon except in an attempt to win this bet by doing so, which this statement hereby nullifies!”
Mwaaaaaha ha ha haaaaaahhhh!!!
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantcray17 wrote:
Just thought I’d let you know, she was eliminated from NXT this week. I knew she wasn’t going to win. But whatever…It’s fixed, anyways.
Jamie’s elimination…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYUOosngGb4Ok, so I wouldn’t even know about her if not for it severely overlapping my Tivo recordings of Warehouse 13.
As far as I know (and PLEASE correct me if I am wrong), Brittany has not had any media exposure prior to WWE or FCW as say a fitness or figure competitor or model. Celeste has, but now that Brittany’s Diva run is apparently over, I am concerned that we may never see more of her. Now I’m not complaining that they still have Celeste. Both of them had my attention, but I definitely favored Brittany.
I really hope we get to see more of Brittany Beede whether it be in wrestling or in fitness/figure. What a waste it would be.
Wow.
What a bod!
….Just, wow.
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm
phenomsParticipantthe_collector_2 wrote:
Dude…
I didn’t just look at the photo and go “OKAY THAT’S HER”. Look at the facts and the list. You want something more conclusive? All right let’s use logic for once.
This is the Saw 3d article on Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saw_3D
This is the picture you guys are comparing:
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/4308/saw3dmuscle1.png
This is Betsy Russell:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Russell,_Betsy_%282007%29.jpg
Let’s go back to the wiki article.
Look at the cast list and how many females are listed on there? Now let’s look at IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1477076/fullcredits#cast
Let’s click on VIEW FULL CAST LIST.
Almost every single female actress on that list has a headshot posted in that profile. Do you see ANY women on that list that look like the photograph we’re comparing to? I looked at the list very carefully and not one of the women listed besides Betsy Russell matches the description.
Also I use Windows Magnifier to get a closer look at the photos, they are practically identical. We know that the woman is not an Extra is the movie, why? Because extra’s never get close ups of their face. So this woman has to be a principal or supporting role.
Now, I’m not trying to brush off your knowledge of female muscle, but I will tell you that the arms in the comparison photo and the ones on wiki CAN be the same exact arms.
Do not mistake a camera close up to give the illusion of muscle. A good example of this is the horrible movie Anaconda’s 2 which made it seem like the blonde woman character had biceps, when in reality it was just the camera catching a flex.
Also do not forget that they images could be touched up either as a still in photoshop, or for the movie itself. It is obviously not impossible to ‘touch up’ certain scenes to make a character look a bit more in shape than they actually are.
OR an even more likely scenario.
It is also entirely possible that they used a body double and put Betsy’s head over the body double.
I color correct the image, added some brightness, and removed the green. Tell me that is not Betsy.
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/4308/saw3dmuscle1.png
Now, there could be hundreds of reasons why her arms look muscular. Either she decided to lift some weights knowing she was going to be in 3d, or she got body doubles. EITHER WAY… there is no denying that the woman in this photo is Betsy Russell.
Can’t give you much more proof than that.

Oh and I forgot to add this, a full body shot of that same photo:
http://www.cinemablend.com/images/news/20763/_1285122783.jpg
Considering that in wiki she is listed as Jigsaw’s Ex-Wife and they’re using that photo for promotional reasons. All signs point to that person being a principal character and not a supporting character. Like I said before, movies will never use a still of an Extra for their promotional items.
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm918324736/nm0751018
Another picture, her arms looks thin enough that it can show off the striations.
When the movie comes out I would be willing to be $100 dollars that it’s her.
Okay my last edit:
http://www.youtube.com/user/LionsgateLIVE?v=sVe5BIcF-tw&feature=pyv&ad=4889772956&kw=saw
Trailer 2A, you can pause and look at her more closely. Your honor, the defense rests.
“Let’s use logic for once.” Tsk tsk. Now I know you know better than to presume that I am one devoid of logic.
This is a post more worthy of the level I am accustomed to from you. Sorry to prod you into it, but it yielded the sort of quality post I know you are capable of.
While I am tempted to counter your weaker points, the objective here is identification of the actress in the screen capture.
After I made my post yesterday I looked again at my Google image search and found photographic proof to confirm that the actress is Betsy…
http://www.whosdatedwho.com/tpx_47175/betsy-russell/lookbook
Scroll down to

It says “Actress Betsy Russell attends the Rock Star Suite Party with The Hollywood Reporter and Yowie.com held at Float at the Hard Rock Hotel San Diego on July 23, 2010 in San Diego, California.”
The photo is current and while the arm appears much the same physical size as a photo above it from 2008, there is a clear difference in muscle tone and her bf% is lower which means more of the size is muscle than fat.
I found some other photos that also appeared to be current and in support, but this was the only one with a date. I would have liked to see some current photos with her in a state of flex, but the video the screen capture is from is probably all I can hope for.
Now on to a few points I can’t resist countering 😛 …
You mention “illusion of muscle”. Seriously? Look at the picture again “dude”.
Also do not forget that they images could be touched up either as a still in photoshop, or for the movie itself. It is obviously not impossible to ‘touch up’ certain scenes to make a character look a bit more in shape than they actually are.
I took the screen capture myself from one of the trailers on youtube. I did not photoshop it, not even to color correct it (thanks for doing that). My PC with photoshop on it has been down for the past month till I get around to getting a new video card for it.
The exact youtube video was http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zg0go2b3ekY
At the 18 second mark. Not as high resolution as the trailers you linked to, but spends more time on the scene of interest.She is clearly tugging at the chains resulting in a flex of Isometric contraction.
The body double idea doesn’t add up. Popular media still generally frowns on femuscle.
I looked up Anacondas 2 aka Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid. Ironic that the cast included Salli Richardson-Whitfield who is known to be muscular, particularly after that scene she had in Eureka showing off her abdominals.
My Deviant Art Page (old stuff):
phenoms.deviantart.comMy Booru Gallery (new stuff):
phenoms.booru.orgAlso
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenoms/index00.htm
www.thevalkyrie.com/picthumb/p/phenom_fett/index00.htm -
AuthorPosts