[Seldom]

boinaka wrote:

I remember hearing that piece years ago, and remember thinking that she was delusional. If I remember right, the story kind of hinted at that. I don’t remember superpowers, I remember secret agent kinds of things though.
Do you remember the flight vs invisibility debate?

The flight vs invisibility discussion was great fun.

I didn’t get that she’s delusional. Rather I got the impression that being incredibly ass-kicking and awesome doesn’t fulfill her. At the end she talks about wanting more of a social life and doing the things normal people do instead of weapons training with militia groups and finishing college by 18.

[Seldom]

Favorite quote: “I like to focus on the upper chest, because we all have boobs, we all have implants.”

She comes across as cheerful and fun as well as muscular, strong, and drop-dead gorgeous!

[Seldom]

chris10000 wrote:

FlakBait wrote:

It’s the internet not real life,

your luck internet exist…people like you have the big word in internet , but in real life couldnt even take a girl to dinner…

[Seldom]

I love her shape. Massive, gorgeous, and cut do her proud! Good lord what majestic shoulders she has.

The preview system doesn’t work well on Firefox on Mac (cannot pause the video). Other than that it seems like a good idea to me. One thing I would like is if the name of the bodybuilder was also a link to that woman’s Awefilms profile.

[Seldom]

Alright, I’ll bite. I know better, but just because sometimes I get drunk and stupid, I’ll serve up some tips for you:

No woman on the internet cares that these things matter to you. Women groom themselves for their own self-image, for other women in their life, and for sexual partners they are both attracted to and likely to meet. You fall into none of these categories.

Looks are important and matter to people when seeking out a mate. Everyone knows this, and only the truly delusional argue the point. That said, when you put up front all of your physical requirements, it is an advertisement that not only are looks important to you, but these features are the only things that matter to you. That is attractive to exactly no-one, and interesting to the same number. What is even the point of such a post?

Everyone, women and men, want to be an object to their beloved sometimes. Nobody wants to be a sexual object all the time. This sort of checklist only serves to highlight your inexperience, immaturity, and focus on physical features as not just an important, but the only driving factor in your dating life. Again, that is attractive to nobody!

Everything you mentioned is an attractive quality in a potential female mate. Nevertheless, such a checklist is a turn-off not only to potential female partners, but to potential male friends as well. I recommend you engage in a serious re-appraisal of your approach to internet message forums in general and to engagement with other human beings in particular.

[Seldom]

CptMatt wrote:

I just don’t get how doing something that demeaning to someone else is a turn on. I get S&M, because both are willing participants and deriving their own pleasure from it, but not that sort of stuff. :dry: :huh:

Pleasure derived from the idea of power and control and pain, either giving or receiving. The erotic imagination is vast and varied.

You’ve made the mistake of attributing the turn-on to the act itself, rather than the participants or the reader. It is not that torture is a turn-on. That would be attributing erotic attributes to the torture. It is that the fantasy of torture can be a turn-on to the reader. It is an attribute of the reader’s erotic imagination, not the act itself.

This is an important distinction to make. When you think that eroticism is inherent in the imaginary act rather than the participants, you are dangerously close to then moving from that to a judgment on those who find it erotic. Those with torture fantasies then become weird, perverted, the other, and must be punished and fixed.

A better phrasing is that the torture scene is not erotic to you. The implied question in your phrasing was “How can imaginary nonconsensual torture be erotic?” The answer, of course, is that to you it cannot be erotic.

[Seldom]

Very attractive woman. I seem to remember her having bigger muscles though, is that my imagination?

[Seldom]

pdg wrote:

She just had her boobs done! :woohoo:

Oh no! I hope not. What is your source?

[Seldom]

Wowza! One of the world’s most beautiful women just keeps getting more amazing.

I’m not exaggerating, I do think Alina is a truly stunning world-class beauty.

[Seldom]

I love the crushed bodies!

[Author]

Posts