[TC2]

Impressive!  Some nice bodies on there!

[TC2]

Thanks for the link BK, it works now!  I'd fix the audio lip syncing, but it's only off by like a second, so it's not enough for me to want to look into.  Great clip so far though!

[TC2]

The shirt instantly explodes and surprisingly NOT at the seams!  Pretty incredible, because all the times I've seen shirts ripped, they always ripped near the shoulders and never down the back like that.

It looked like her body literally exploded out of it, pretty impressive!

[TC2]

Heh heh,

The question isn't on the ability of the bodybuilder really.  It's more about the concept…

For instance, if we use comics as an example.

I think that heroes who only shoot fireballs and eye blasts from a distance, should be rather scrawny and not as muscular compared to a hero that fights hand to hand or has super strength.  This matches the concept of the character, which means that they are weak when up close but strong at a distance.

It wouldn't make sense for Captain America to be scrawny since he's a hand to hand fighter with super strength.  Otherwise you get the "Supergirl" effect, a scrawny toothpick who can lift tanks.  Does that make much sense to you?

So when Cpt Matt is talking about some characters not being an ideal fit for muscles, it just means that some characters or people just don't look right with an enormously muscular body.  Sometimes you can just tell by looking at someone's face that they wouldn't carry muscles well.

For instance, I personally don't think Jennifer Aniston would look good with big muscles and I've seen the morphs done to give me an idea.  It just doesn't work for me, she's very attractive but she just doesn't seem the type that should have muscles.

Lara Croft, she would look great as perhaps a figure competitor with a six pack of abs, well defined back, and arms, but she wouldn't be as good being beefy and massive, otherwise you expect her to lift boulders.  Which would be fine, but it'd be a totally different character.

Muscles simply don't work for all, that's why you get some hideous "women" with muscles and you're like "Yikes…" where as other women it suits them better and they look perfect with massive size.

[TC2]

That's fine and all, but to request every single picture to be she-hulked out?  Then not to leave a comment for artists who make the picture?  Kinda iffy if you ask me.

[TC2]

I think you are a little -too- obsessed with She-Hulk.

[TC2]

GTS for me never had any appeal, unless the FMG character was becoming so powerful that she began to tower.  For instance it can be very erotic if an FMG character, kept on growing as she was having intercourse.  The desire to want more, begging for the partner to make her bigger, which in turn causes her breasts to swell, her nipples to become erect, her clothes to rip, her muscles to bulge, and her body to grow in general.

In that regard, GTS mixed with FMG can be very fascinating.  Though usually in my case I use GTS as the final form for the FMG character, and usually have an enormous battle erupt between two FMG/GTS characters.

However, GTS alone with its foot crushing, eating, penetration, and no muscle?  Eh, never did anything for me.  Even with the clothes ripping, unless there was muscle I really didn't have much interest in it.

[TC2]

Anyone else having problems running the video?  It's going turbo speed for me, and I don't necessarily want to import it to Premiere Pro to watch it.

[TC2]

Yeah that wasn't as great as it could have been.  Though the clothes ripping and muscle bulging was nice, the body was once again terrible and the paint wasn't very well done.  However, the entire recreation was pretty accurate to the comics and I did appreciate and enjoy the effort they put into it.

I would hope that they do more productions, but manage to somehow cast a more muscular she-hulk someday.

[TC2]

Iris Kyle, again?  BLEGH!

I can't believe Heather got 14th place, she was sure to be a shoe in for at least 2nd or 3rd.  Very disappointing.

[Author]

Posts