Forum Replies Created
-
Just have to make a comment here.
There have been a lot of “morphs” in this thread that just use the liquify tool to add a blob of pixels to a woman’s arm and call that a “morph.”
I’m sorry, but as someone who spends hours agonizing over having the perfect hair line, skin shade, small details, and even photo grain.
It is disheartening to come into this thread and see muscle morphs that are just popped out in a few minutes. Separating an actress from a photo then using the liquify tool DOES NOT COUNT AS A MORPH!
If you’re going to go through the trouble of adding muscles to a celebrity, at least put some effort into it. There should be MUSCLE DEFINITION. Veins, striations, separation, mass, form.
Not just a blob of stretched pixels to which someone goes “Boom, done. I have created muscle art.”
No, it’s lazy, it’s sloppy, and it’s doing a disservice to this thread. Grab some photos of female body builders, replace the actress arms or heads and MAKE IT LOOK LIKE MUSCLE.
Examples down below:Two from me:
Blake Lively
Random “Manip, with head swap”
Some from Edinaus:
and a She-Hulk by Mav:
Do you see the difference? Post more of these and less of the previous ones in this thread. Sorry PD07 for calling you out, but you have the most posts with the liquify tool.
