- This topic has 24 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 12 months ago by
Fett.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 27, 2006 at 8:27 am #43353
AbyssPlanet
ParticipantWow, this is really goofy. Count me in with the "don't like it at all" crowd. :-
November 27, 2006 at 8:56 am #43354CDR
ParticipantIm in the single counted crowd of "I love that we have Lingster around to give us a free place to talk our minds out and that he tries to improve the place for better".
Besides that I think that the only problem with this thing is that its a bit narrower than the other.
Lingster: Do tweak it until YOU like it. I trust your judgment.
THANKS,CDR
November 27, 2006 at 9:09 am #43355Lingster
KeymasterOK, nevermind. We're back to something more conventional. I'll tweak it for color, etc when I get the chance.
November 27, 2006 at 9:12 am #43356David
ParticipantWhat the f…??? I was just in here a few hours ago. :- 😮 AHHHHH!!! It changed again in midpost!
It did it again!!!
November 27, 2006 at 3:48 pm #43357
AlexGKeymasterSidebar here – nice Avatar, Sir Masschine. ;D
“I like a good story well told. That is the reason I am sometimes forced to tell them myself.”
~ Mark Twain / Samuel Clemens (1907)November 28, 2006 at 5:40 am #43358oldFred
ParticipantPrefer the old format. But the new one is workable – EXCEPT, selecting "Mark all messages read" always puts me in the middle of some thread or other. And selecting "Check all unread posts" does the same thing the first time, on the second try the list of topics is presented.
I know you're trying to make the forum more solid and I appreciate your efforts, now and previously, but this version really isn't too good.
Fred
November 28, 2006 at 5:53 am #43359Lingster
KeymasterPrefer the old format. But the new one is workable – EXCEPT, selecting "Mark all messages read" always puts me in the middle of some thread or other. And selecting "Check all unread posts" does the same thing the first time, on the second try the list of topics is presented.
I know you're trying to make the forum more solid and I appreciate your efforts, now and previously, but this version really isn't too good.
Fred
Those are not template issues. Also, the template commented upon by earlier posters was removed and replaced with the one you see now.
November 28, 2006 at 6:30 am #43360Fett
ParticipantThis new one is absolutely fine. Cheers, Lingster. ^__^
November 28, 2006 at 7:43 am #43361elee0228
ParticipantI like this one. It's a lot cleaner, and seems to be a quite bit faster than the old one. Though I suspect that has to do more with the webhost…
November 28, 2006 at 7:51 am #43362Lingster
KeymasterNah, it's faster because I took it out from under Joomla. Joomla still translates (or mistranslates) the links, but we don't have load all the Joomla modules everytime we reload a forum page.
I may have the links screw-up fixed. People will need to log out and log back in – I think it had to do with Joomla getting confused over user sessions.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.