CONDORMAN

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 43 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Kairi from Kingdom Hearts 2 #48155
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    Kairi's neck and head do not fit the rest of her body at all.

    I hate to bust your muffins man but this is the "Kairi" from wikipedia jackass.  Here is the reference smucko http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kairi_%28Kingdom_Hearts%29.jpg
    If you've got a problem with how she looks I suggest you get your too white and nerdy self over to wikipedia and edit it. I just did a request, which was to give her muscles. So don't bust my balls if I don't wack off while playing ps2 games because apparently I wounded some part of you that must be choking your chicken to video game anime characters if you are this deeply offended.
    head and neck is exactly the same in both drawings

    you are too white and nerdy…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mlsiw5lmEzw

    in reply to: Kairi from Kingdom Hearts 2 #48150
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    Very good stuff CONDORMAN!  😮

    I'd love to see some artwork that's entirely from your imagination. Not to say the excellent 'Artie' tributes aren't appreciated though.  ;D

    But if you can do such amazingly cute amazons in tribute, what must be brewing in your vault of original ideas must be fascinating.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Cowprobe, Thanks man! Comments like yours are what keeps me motivated!

    The archie stuff was for a friend and anime isn't my drawing style but I thought I would give the request a try. Currently I'm working with Flash to make cartoons. I've got some story lines planned out but I'm still learning Flash. Once I've got a handle on Flash I will open "the vault of ideas" In the meantime I'm attempting to make a tribute with Flash to "the Strong Arms of the Ma" Simpsons episode where Marge becomes a bodybuilder.

    here is an exported jpeg from Flash, it's the character "Cookie Kwan" from the Simpsons. I've given her a physique like the girls from the Simpsons bodybuilding episode although, I may alter it a bit to make her body more pleasing to my tastes. Notice how the line thickness changes though out the image. This is especially evident in the eye lashes. I'm accustom to drawing in Photoshop so the Flash vector based stuff is taking me time to learn. Eventually I want to take the girls from the iron maidens contest and animate their posing routines with music and foley.

    in reply to: NSFW: Artie the schmotographer #47790
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    Great work Condorman, might I enquire as to whether you have some manner of site?

    Not currently but I hope to have a flash cartoon site in the near future

    in reply to: betsy, veronika and the girls vs. the boys #47401
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    I love parody! there was a Archie cover waaay back in the early 90's where the have a female bodybuilder on and she was not pretty at all.
    a shame they did not have you on the art staff them.

    Thanks for the compliment! Since reading your post  I've been searching for the comic you are referring to but I have had no luck.
    http://www.comicspriceguide.com
    Can anyone point me in the right direction?

    in reply to: New Artie and Betsy #47039
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    I love the artwork, but I'm just curious – if you know it's Betty, and we know it's Betty, why bother calling her Betsy in the actual image?  ???

    Too many lawyers out of work…. CYA

    in reply to: Re: Request thread #5087
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    Hi, I have a little request.
    I'd like to see a muscle morph of Lucy Pinder, a wonderful woman.
    Here the best pics to morph I've found (after clicked on the link, click again on the thumbnail to get the full size pic):
    http://img508.imageshack.us/done.php?l=img508/3875/lucypinderpool5.jpg
    Thanks!!

    @Higalack: great job!! ^^

    Hey I'm really late but hope you like my submission

    in reply to: Tabletop RPGs. #25341
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    comments from another forum…thought he had some good points perhaps others had these same questions so here is Boo's post and my answers…

    Just remember, you asked for it… Wink

    He heh… he he he he… heh heh. Well, I certainly bet you didn’t intend to run into anyone like me here. 20 years, 85% of which has been spent running games instead of playing them (sigh), with roughly 5 years of D&D, 5 of WFRP, and 10 with the various WW Storyteller systems, in that order. I also know Core D&D 3.x, though I haven’t really played it, along with various Palladium games, and probably a dozen systems you’ve never even heard of. Unfortunately I have only a vague, superficial knowledge of D20-Modern mechanics. Currently I’m working on my own FRP system using the original WW Storyteller core mechanics as a base. Working verrrrry slowly—seven years now I think it’s been… at least 5 anyway.

    So with credentials duly submitted, it’s Hammer Time!

    First off, you realize that pretty much every key physical change you’ve made in your setting is totally impossible without magic to explain it, right? (Or, alternately, extensive, purposeful tailored genetic engineering along the lines of “huge project of 1000’s of top scientists eating, sleeping, & breathing it for the last 20 years” or “what if Lex Luthor, Dr. Henry Pym (Ant-man), Dr. Hank McCoy (Beast), and Mr. Fantastic got together to…”).

    This: With transportation a necessity of modern life people have reverted back to man powered technology. More people are bicycling, roller blading, or just using their own two feet for transportation. This has caused huge drops in the level of obesity in Americans.

    +

    This: Females are growing larger and developing more quickly. The average breast size in America increased from 34B to 36C during the end of the 20th century. This coincided with an increase in dress size. However, with environmental factors causing an increase in athletic activity as well as additional hormonal factors women of 2020 have an average breast size of a 38D yet there overall body fat has decreased.

    +

    This: The new generations of female champions possessed muscles of extraordinary sizes yet had none of the secondary male sexual characteristics of the early female bodybuilders that used steroids.

    =

    Does not compute.

    Can’t be done on a chemical level; it simply will not work. Absolutely requires genetic engineering to cause those kinds of contradictory changes to take place.

    Now, if you were going with “you are what you eat” and “sloppy science causing things to get… messy” then fine. But, and it’s the big but; meat producers don’t give a flying fuck about fat production, in fact, they actually want to cut it down. Fat isn’t meat; it’s a waste product cut off at the processing level. Sure, it can be used to make stuff, but no one is going to purposefully engineer an increase in any type of fat production for a byproduct that only has some secondary value. Producers only care about size and meat production vs feed input. So no big boobies for you! Wink

    Second: What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, & vice versa. I.e.- congratulations, every woman is Wonder Woman… alas, every man would also be Superman (albeit a Superman with boobs Wink Razz ), so overall, no gains except the superficial. Use the basic rules and just assume everyone can break objects & injure non-affected living things to a greater degree. There, done; all it is is a superfical setting change. Albeit not the one you want… Razz

    Third: The bullets had barely penetrated 3/8’s of an inch into Julia’s pectoral muscles. The bullets when removed were severely deformed resembling a flower blossom. Doctors hypothesized that because of her mitochondrial density the muscle flexed around the bullet crushing it as it entered.

    …you do realize this is idiotic on a biological level, right? If someone’s muscle fiber density is high enough to stop bullets from doing any serious harm they’d have to have at least a 100 Strength in the D20 system. Plus, the reason modern bullet-resistant materials work isn’t because they’re dense, it’s because they distribute, absorb (muffle), and/or deflect the kinetic impact of a shot. Increasing density is the last way you want to go because dense = heavy, hard, inflexible, & prone to catastrophic failure (i.e.- shattering) if it’s hit at it’s break-point or harder.

    So… either it’s some God(dess) waking up, a secret cabal of ancient Amazon Sorceresses defrosted from stasis, or, someone did this on purpose (or multiple someones). In which case, people would know it was done on purpose, if not necessarily by who, because only a complete idiot would miss the signs of tailored genetic tampering.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know; all you want is a setting where females have pretty faces, big boobs, and big frames with big muscles on them. But if I can quickly read this & realize it isn’t worth the paper it’s written on because it’s got all the plausibility of a piece of wet tissue paper, your setting is too flawed for any serious player to ever put up with, because they’ll be seeing the same inconsistencies I do, & they’ll want an explanation that’s better than “these are my half-assed reasons so I can make the setting the way I want”. Seriously, drop the pseudo-science bullshit and just bust out the tried-and-true “it’s magic, now STFU, ok?” At least then it works… Or alternately, the “some crazy genius released a retrovirus into all of the earth’s biosphere that was centuries ahead of it’s time, designed to radically re-write half of the human genetic code. It’s everywhere, everyone was exposed to it, and no one’s smart enough to figure out how to fix it. Deal with it…”

    Fourth objection, again:

    The bullets had barely penetrated 3/8’s of an inch into Julia’s pectoral muscles. The bullets when removed were severely deformed resembling a flower blossom. Doctors hypothesized that because of her mitochondrial density the muscle flexed around the bullet crushing it as it entered.

    Do we really need this? Seriously. Still basically impossible except using magic, and stupidly ludicrous as well if your setting isn’t Superhero based. I need to start carrying around anti-tank weapons in order to deal with 1 more-or-less human being? Please, gimmi a break…

    Now if it is a Superhero setting, well, fine and dandy, but as far as I can tell, it isn’t.

    And last but not least, you overlooked some things that don’t seem too important to begin with, but actually are:

    Increasing athleticism (usually) increases sex drive, increasing strength and physical prowess along with societal acceptance of it (usually) causes increased confidence, leading to increased sexual activity if the person is so inclined, if not necessarily the drive itself, and unless you’re using magic as the cause, the biological changes required will also result in increased sex drive. Basically, all these super-hot women are going to want to have a super-lot of sex (comparative to the “old numbers” under the previous female archetype).

    You didn’t mention any geniuses coming up with a cure for AIDS or other STDs in your setting. A new sexual revolution could skyrocket STDs to epidemic proportions, and possibly result in new strains of old favorites, or even entirely new killer infections.

    “Race” wars. Sorry, but again, unless magic is involved, there’s no way many third-world countries would ever accept these changes, let alone embrace them. Many, many cultures follow the rule “women exist to serve/be subservient to men”, “female circumcision” is still prevalent in many African countries, most Chinese peasants still put little to no value on “girl children”, and so on and so fourth…

    Sure, it might take a while for the effects to “trickle down” to these countries if we stay with your crappy explanation for why it’s happening, but they invariably will. Someone is going to buy some of those “cows the size of rhinos/pigs the size of cows /chickens the size of pigs and that eat half as much” and introduce them to the local stock, or start up these alternate energy sources for their countries that require the bio-engineered stocks to make them work.

    Once that happens, well, lookout folks, things will be getting messy.

    These are things I quickly thought of that I’d want answers to in your setting. Got any?

    Whenever you build a setting if you want to do it right the first rule is always “cover your bases” (or ass, it’s all the same Razz ). Don’t start with your superficial theme & work backwards from it to “make it work”, start with the foundation, making sure everything is plausible, firmly grounded in the mechanics of the system, and survives a reasonable “suspension of disbelief” test, and then work your way up towards your setting themes and points of interest. Otherwise, people like me can come along and rip it to shreds in a few minutes time… Wink Razz

    As well, if you can manage to find it, I suggest you check out the old Aberrant game by White Wolf Game Studios. You could easily modify it to run your setting with little to no trouble, and I think the mechanics would better support what you seem to be going for.

    Boo

    Yeeouch Dude! I really think you need to get laid.

    Your first argument is that women with larger breasts and lower levels of body fat could only be conceived by comic book scientists? Okay well here is an article that supports that women’s breast size has been increasing. I’ve taken the liberty of quoting it directly.

    It's all for the breast
    BY SASHA
    I recall you writing a while back that you're always willing to discuss boobs, so here's a statistical question: I've noticed an apparent increase in big-busted women, D and DD cups seemingly more common than a few years back (or maybe it's just my declining eyesight). A statistic often quoted on the internet for North American women is: "The average bra size today is 36C, up from 34B a decade ago." Is this true? And, if so, what's responsible for this happy burgeoning? Changes in diet? An increase in cosmetic surgery? High-tech bras? More "background hormones" in our food? Wishful thinking? CURI-RUSS MYERS
    "Actually," says Jennifer Klein, owner of the lingerie store Secrets From Your Sister (476 Bloor W.), "that statistic is inaccurate. The average breast size is not a 36C but a 34F." And it's rising! Says Klein, "last year it was a 34DD." Holy Toledo, by the year 2005 we're all going to look like novelty strippers.
    Last time I spoke to plastic surgeon Dr. Stubbs, he told me breast augmentation was more popular than ever ("I'm doing two breasts and a labia every day," he said), which may explain some rise in sizes. But Klein says, "I can count on my fingers the clients we have with breast implants." One theory, supported by Klein, is that women's breasts are getting bigger because of growth hormones in non-organic meat and milk and the hormones in birth control pills, which are being peed out into our drinking water. "Here we see a lot of women from age 11 on who are really busty," says Klein. "Fifty per cent of the women are a D cup or larger."

    The original article here: http://www.eye.net/eye/issue/issue_01.30.03/city/lovebites.html

    So if activity levels are increasing because of higher fuel cost wouldn’t it make sense that women would decrease their body fat bellow current standards….yet if breast size is increasing from hormonal factors as discussed in the article above wouldn’t that mean that even if they lost some adipose tissue from exercise that the women of 2020 would still have larger breasts and lower body fat than the women of the current era????

    Second part …that female bodybuilders are larger and more muscular without secondary sexual side effects produced by anabolic steroids. This is all based on Myostatin research.  Testosterone and growth hormone produce muscle by effecting myostatin production however if myostatin is controlled without the use of hormones then presto chango….bigger muscles no sexual side effects

    Here are some articles on Myostatin and Myostatin Mutation
    http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?article_id=218392292&cat=1_2
    http://www.gigtforeningen.dk/17C6BE62-AAE5-4A6B-A927-D60E99BA3945
    myostatin for livestock production
    http://www.qfac.com/articles/myostatin.html

    Okay to answer the “if women are more muscular …then men are too” Well women possess and inert chromosome. There are arguments whether it is active or not. So my explanation is that this inert chromosome has allowed for direct manipulation of  myostatin in women where as men are lacking the genetic code that women have…the manipulation of the male gene is not possible. In  D20 AMAZON men can take myostatin inhibitors however females can be turned into a myostatin mutant. You said you are familiar with palladium well if you know Rifts then this my have similar repercussions to a Juicer conversion.

    Inert chromosome in women
    http://health.2theadvocate.com/index.cfm?pt=itemDetail&Item_ID=117810&Site_Cat_ID=7
    http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/75/11/5618
    http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1076699

    Stopping bullets….mitochondria are considered the power house of the cell. If you would like I can draw a mitochondria under the effect of a densifier to illustrate A person with larger muscles has a greater amount of mitochondria. So if a person has been taking a mitochondrial densifier then the amount of  mitochondria is increased even more. So being shot is like breaking the surface tension of water and trying to penetrate something like sand. A spear or an arrow will penetrate much deeper than a bullet into sand because the velocity and the mass of the projectile. My reference was to a .45 ACP round which is a big slow round. Now if that was replaced by something else ….such as a Barret .50 cal then the bullet would not be as easily stopped.

    Mitochondia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrion

    You said someone would need strength of 100 for their body to stop bullets. I personally can’t think of any gaming system where strength has any barring on armor or hit points. D20/D&D bases hit points on Constitution, War Hammer Fantasy Role Play damage you can take is Toughness, and in Palladium it is Physical Endurance. In my game the rules to avoid damage from a bullet would be similar to damage reduction however there would be fortitude save required. And this would only be available to someone using mitochondrial densifiers.

    Where the hell did you come up with the whole athletes are sluts idea??? The most athletic woman I know (also a state champion bodybuilder) is 28 yrs old and still a virgin…so in the next 16 years prophylactics disappear???

    Interesting that you bring up the Chinese and no worth on females in the culture….did you notice the Asian with the big gun? She is a Taiwanese soldier who was Chinese born but adopted by agents from the Taiwan government for the Myostatin solder project. Ever heard the female of the species is deadlier than the male???? Basically cast away female Chinese are being turned into elite military by the Taiwanese.

    in reply to: Tabletop RPGs. #25339
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    Yeah it seems that the majority of people would want to play a female character. The reason I prefer people to play their own sex is because I had a game where a player had a character that was a sexual fantasy for him (a female fighter who would eventually prestige class into Kensal AKA:weapon master). It was during an oriental adventures game and he pulled a John Rambo (went off on his own). His character camped in a forest that was known to be dangerous without taking any precautions and was attack while she was sleeping. The character should have died but I allowed the other player characters to come to the rescue. As a consequence of that players foolish actions the female character had some scarring….eventually I would allow her scars to be treated but I hoped this would make the player reconsider before going off solo when the entire party needed to be there….Well the player after finding out his character was scarred and was no longer the beauty she once was wanted to tear up his sheet and play another character.

    in reply to: Tabletop RPGs. #25337
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    Gamestable has a system for dice rolling that would stop any cheating. When generating the background I thought people would play a character that was the same sex as they were and I didn't intend to have anyone playing a woman. However, if there were females I think it would be best to create a racial class similar to the rules in "Savage Species" for playing a monster. This would allow a player character to take a character level or a racial level. For example Female myostatin mutant might take a additional character level or racial level. A racial level would increase strength/constitution and perhaps allow for feats like great fortitude. Combining the Racial and Character levels would give the ECL (Equivilant Character Level). So there would be no uber powerful characters, no level adjustments, and female characters would have to decide to take a level that would increase muscles or character class. A woman could potentially take just levels in racial class increasing strength and constitution building a super human physique yet her base attack bonus would stay the same unless she took some character class levels. She would still have her plus to hit modifier from her strength bonus but she wouldn't be developing any base attack bonus…. What do you guys think?

    in reply to: Tabletop RPGs. #25334
    CONDORMAN
    Participant

    Originally I thought I would run the game myself using the Game Table software http://gametable.galactanet.com/ but unfortunately I don't have broadband internet right now so I'm in limbo. The concept is still very rough but any thoughts or ideas are greatly appreciated.

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 43 total)