[cpbell0033944]

Shulk Smash!  Nuff said.  8)

Indeed – huge arms! 😮 8)

[cpbell0033944]

Is the preparing for a competition?

[cpbell0033944]

I swear, Tina Lockwood was superhuman. All that muscle and no steroids. Wow.

I agree. 😮 8)

[cpbell0033944]

I like her physique, but her eyes are scaring me a little! 😮

[cpbell0033944]

I'm being credited here unjustifiably – I was wrong with #2, as my initial answer was incorrect I said probably Amanda Dunbar).

As for te new batch, well, #1 is definetly Bele, but #2 is stumping me ATM.

[cpbell0033944]

yes…but it is only working with figure girls…
no doctor would put the implant under very strong pec muscles

Nikki Fuller had under-pec implants, and she's hardly a tiny figure girl. 😉

[cpbell0033944]

Sorry to hear about your problems.  Good luck with the new account. 8)

[cpbell0033944]

While I prefer the off-season look by far, I can understand why people want to see the in-season look (and why the competitors would want to be photographed at that time).  While I find the general shapes and lack of hard edges much more attractive, the fact is that a streamlined and clearly-delineated musculature is just downright impressive to behold.  And if you've gone through all the work and suffering to look that way, then you want the world to see it.  A well-defined back is really amazing to see.

I also do like a well-defined appearance.  What I dslike is the pinched cheek, dry contest shape when veins pop out and the skin looks dry and leathery.  I can understand others liking the muscles to pop and bulge, but actually finding the pinched cheeks etc. sexy?  Sorry, don't get it. ???

[cpbell0033944]

The Phipps pin-up is great. 8)

[cpbell0033944]

I doubt GH has anything to do with facial appearance.  In my semi-professional opinion, it's a mix of steroids and mostly, dryness and lack of bodyfat.

[Author]

Posts