Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 7, 2008 at 4:30 pm in reply to: Who got more raw strength Cindy Phillips or Britt Miller? #77600
cpbell0033944
ParticipantOf course I can't know that sure. But ususally she looks much ripped than Cindy. I know you're a Cindy fan 🙂 but I think Britt is stronger.
I don't mind Britt either ;), though I must admit Cindy is my favourite. I don't mind if Britt is the stronger, actually.
cpbell0033944
ParticipantThe GOP is responsible for universal suffrage in the US, decades before it was achieved in the UK.
I'm not saying they didn't – I'm saying that the argument for restricting the vote to those you want to have the vote is a generally conservative trait, irrespective of national boundaries. Anyway, you didn't have all states giving women the vote until after we gave women the vote – we were just regrettably tardy on reducing the age restriction.
cpbell0033944
ParticipantThey can do whatever they like. I'm not in the business of pressuring strangers into doing what I think is best – and that's one big difference between America's individualist conservatism and European 'progressivism'.
With respect, you're not seeing what I'm trying to say. There's nothing about European mainstream politics that tries to coerce people into doing something they don't want to do. My argument was that you seem to think you're being magnamimous (sp?) by saying that you won't do it either. That is a given – if you or anyone else here were to put pressure on people, I'd call them fascist without hesitation. The fact remains, though, that you stated that you'd prefer it if less well-educated people (i.e those at the lower end of the socio-economic spectrum) din't vote. This seems a typical US conservative approach – restrict (or at least hankering after the ability to restrict) the vote to those who you feel deserve it or are worthy of it. This is fundamentally undemocratic to my eyes, because it is precisely the excuse that was given by the establishment at the time of women's suffrage. My progressivist philiosophy is very different – I dvocate providing better education to all so that every legal voter is able to make an informed decision.
cpbell0033944
ParticipantNow this is my sort of pool side girl . . .

Same here! She's looking lush and hot in these photos, with a gorgeous smile.
cpbell0033944
ParticipantGreat progress on the furry drawing!
cpbell0033944
ParticipantI'm not saying they should be denied the vote, just that I prefer it when they don't bother to show up.
How is hoping that the less educated don't vote better than improving their education? That seems to me the difference between conservatism and progressivism, and it's why you and I can never agree on matters of politics.
November 6, 2008 at 12:51 am in reply to: **NSFW** Amy’s Conquest Christmas Giveaway & Some Free Pics #77614cpbell0033944
ParticipantFantastic images from a great group of artists! It would be wrong to pick-out one over the rest, but I am very fond of the Dawn montage. 8)
cpbell0033944
ParticipantWelcome – we'd all like to see more of your work, I'm sure! 8)
cpbell0033944
ParticipantIrrespective of party affiliations, as an outsider, I was impressed with the turnout. I wish that our politicians could engender such passion. I am reminded also of a John Wayne quote, in which he said that, though a particular President wasn't his choice, he had become his President, and so he hoped he would do a good job. Now is not the time for feuding, petty recriminations or silly censorship.
cpbell0033944
ParticipantNice video – thanks for linking it Alex. There is something very hot about a small hardbody like Pauline shifting big weights. 😉
-
AuthorPosts