cpbell0033944

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 4,981 through 4,990 (of 5,678 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Heidi Bagwell #53451
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    She has a cheeky, wild-child look about her.  Thanks, Alex.

    in reply to: Christine Envall – Classics of Femuscle #53809
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    She must have been the very definition of "massive".

    in reply to: Annie Rivieccio #34874
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Good God, Annie is just stunning… breathtaking… remarkable.

    Is it obvious I have a crush on her?

    Peace,

    Fairly obvious. ;D 😉
    She's not one of my favourites, but if sheer size is what does it for you, then I'm not surprised you find her so attractive.

    in reply to: I lurk no longer! #54124
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Welcome.

    in reply to: My Uplifting Experiences #52325
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Ummm, yeah, don't know what that means, but it looked positive so thanks. And thanks to the Gov too, we need more stories out of you, the ones that I've seen you write blew me away!

    Er… sorry Jeremy, it was more like tongue-in-cheek humour.  Wayne Rooney is an English (well, Liverpudlian, actually, so not really English at all ;D) football (soccer) player who has a long-term girlfriend who he's expected to marry, yet, about a year ago, he was photographed going into a brothel where he apparently went to bed with a woman in her 50s who was old enough to be a grandmother.  I don't even like soccer, but I know that, every time a younger guy expresses an interest in an older woman, he'll surely be teased about being like Wayne Rooney.
    I really don't mean to be nasty – although I don't share your feelings, I'm not criticising or saying anything against you.  Just gently teasing.  As far as your writing goes, it's as vivid and descriptive as always.

    in reply to: Re: Fire Melting Steel #51371
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

     

    Now you are right that such comments are viewed as ridiculous by all but the most extreme western Europeans.  Unfortunately Europeans are not the problem; the problem is the Muslims who are being persuaded by extremists that 9/11, 7/7 etc. are a Jewish and American conspiracy to slander them and justify our "illegal" actions against terrorist groups such as al-Queda.

    Good point.  Thanks.  I think this is what Lingster was trying to say, but I didn't see that because he condensed it to such a degree with his "Islamist crazies nuke Kamsas City" comment that it became, to my European eyes, somewhat obtuse (no disrespect, Lingster – I needed spoon-feeding.)  I still can't see how her actions were treasonous, though.  Seditious – probably; stupid – definetly, but treasonous?  No; my understanding of treason is that it has to be direct aid to one's enemies, not saying something daft that can be twisted by extremist clerics to brainwash gullible young Muslim lads who often lack direction or a clear sense of their identity.

    in reply to: Re: Fire Melting Steel #51369
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Mm.  Yeah, and when the Islamist crazies nuke Kansas City, and the country is paralyzed because half of those Hollywood retards are saying it was really Bush who did it, what do you suppose happens next?

    Islamist crazies have had multiple attempts to wipe central London off the map (7/7 wasn't the only attempt – all the others were foiled).  We haven't got a Rosie O'Donnell, thank goodness (I never denied she's crazy and has probably committed the crime of sedition, BTW), so it isn't only 'O'Donnell countries' that are at risk.  I cannot understand, though, why the opinions of the Hollywood gossip shop are likely to influence Islamist attacks on the US. 

    in reply to: Fire Melting Steel #51365
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Yes, what she did is between those two things.  As they're both crimes, I don't think the distinction is particularly important.

    I can make it clearer: she is committing sedition for traitorous purposes, which I think is treason. 

    And I would not describe O'Donnell's attacks as criticism – she is making a false allegation of mass murder against the government.  If a substantial portion of the population actually came to believe such a charge, it could destroy the United States.

    As a Brit, the two crimes seem very different – treason was the last hanging offence in the UK before capital punishment was outlawed.
    You might think that committing sedition is treasonous, but to state so on the internet without qualification is not far off slander.
    Also, I never said that O'Donnell's attacks were just criticism and nothing more – what I said was that, if one considers what she has done to be treason, then the logical extension of that would be to consider any strong condemnation of one's nations actions as treason, which is heading rapidly in the direction of a right-wing, dictatorial position.  Right-wing is, IMO as dangerous as left-wing.

    in reply to: The League of Extraordinary Artists #39093
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    Forget Blade . . . this is my type of vamp-buster.  ;D  8)

    As rendered by Jean Sinclair

    D9 Arts BloodRayne by Jean Sinclair

    That's brilliant work, and very sexy!

    in reply to: On The Anatomies Of The Physically Endowed #53239
    cpbell0033944
    Participant

    So did I, I'm so fond of chocolate bars… ::)

    Quelle sorte de chocolat preferez-vous?

Viewing 10 posts - 4,981 through 4,990 (of 5,678 total)