Robert McNay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 341 through 350 (of 858 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Official Thread: Just Who is this Muscle Babe? #95949
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    No idea who she is, but something doesn’t seem right about her. I can’t quite put my finger on it. :dry:

    in reply to: Kristina Dybdahl #95948
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    Wow, she appears to be shiny, even without oil. :blink:

    in reply to: 2010 Ms Olympia #95916
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    FlakBait wrote:

    glitter?? I wasn’t wearing any glitter….dude, you were checking out captmatt :ohmy: well now I just feel cheated on :angry:

    What? Who? Where? What did I do? :blink: :huh:

    in reply to: Female Muscle Growth: House Edition #95709
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    jazztival wrote:

    I think Solarian, aka LordDaroth was trying 2 say this woman is only bulky&muscular by mainstream society’s degree of standards.

    Becuz honestly if she was already doing cardio&keeping in shape with tennis i don’t see why her body wasn’t more ripped than it was.
    I’ve seen softball coaches with better physiques

    Plus,i wonder if she had started lifting actual free weights,…could she have stayed ahead of the pain before the pain went up to an extreme level.

    Alas,nobody thought about such things becuz mainstream hates visible muscles on women.

    Why would she want to do that, lift weights and make herself bigger before its gets too painful to? She obviously doesn’t want to be muscular, she doesn’t want to be ripped, whether her physique lives up to your standard of that word or not. She has some sort of disease that she wants cured so she can get a normal life back. It has nothing to do with societal standards.

    in reply to: Female Muscle Growth: House Edition #95681
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    xoronewithnature wrote:

    So…

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/09/22/woman.mystery.bulking/index.html?hpt=C1

    Quick summary: 40 year old woman suddenly experiences uncontrolled muscle growth. Unlike the brawna version I might write, she experiences serious side effects.

    It’s not lupus.

    In the updated version of the article I read, it said they discovered that it was a virus that normally attacks internal organs, but it was attacking her muscles, but they don’t have a plan to cure it yet.

    It must be excruciating to not be able to lift your arms high enough to turn down a collar or touch your ear lobes. She can’t even go for a walk.

    in reply to: Classic Physiques of Femuscle #95645
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    Are you sure? Those look a heck of a lot bigger than the 50 lb plates I’ve got. Might they be 45 kg, not lb? 45 kg = 100 lbs

    in reply to: Back in the Day #95625
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    I used to buy mine at the Main Street News, up in Evanston IL. With all the kinky porn and fetish magazines they sold out of the limited access aisle, in the back of the shop, no one even blinked at some guy buying FBB mags. :dry:

    in reply to: Classic Physiques of Femuscle #95624
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    AlexG wrote:

    And not only good looking, but strong, too. :blink:

    [/URL]

    Those are 100 lb plates, aren’t they? Five on this side means 5 on the other….. 1000lbs………

    Damn. :blink: :S

    in reply to: Classic Physiques of Femuscle #95600
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    Ooooooooooo Sharon, one of the true “babes” of bodybuilding. Even when she dialed it back to fitness competition and modeling, she was still drop dead gorgeous. I could fall in love with her in about 2 seconds.
    :woohoo: :silly: :kiss: :laugh:

    in reply to: What’s Up With The Spam? #95599
    Robert McNay
    Participant

    AlexG wrote:

    CptMatt wrote:

    Easy explanation for me, I’m not into GTS. 🙂

    Fair enough – as it goes.

    I, myself can take pleasure in the awe and glory of works that not, necessarily appeals to my personal interests. Meaning I can appreciate the efforts placed in them for that and in of itself.

    What I’m saying is, maybe you don’t like GTS – and for whatever reason – but still you can appreciate the other aspects presented therein, such as fem-buffedness, in and of itself and within that context express your appreciation of the work as presented.

    Remember, bread cast upon the waters does comes back.

    I didn’t think I criticized or disparaged GTS in anyway. I just stated I’m not into it. Just like I’m aware of the beauty and effort of impressionist painting, but I never go down that hall when I visit the Chicago Art Institute.

Viewing 10 posts - 341 through 350 (of 858 total)