Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
GrandmasterParticipant
…destroy she hulk!!!
That’d be a cool title!
GrandmasterParticipant…Javier Pulido draws her eyes too big…
Do you find She-Hulk’s eyes bigger than the other characters?
…and gives her too much of a circular looking head…
We noticed She-Hulk’s very round head (face), too, but don’t mind it! My girl likes that it’s different than the high cheekboned fashion model look (imagine one sucking her cheeks in and puckering her lips).
:sick:
GrandmasterParticipantStory is fine. Art…not so much.
Could you tell me what specifically doesn’t appeal to you, Black’?
GrandmasterParticipant…artwork looks too cartoonish looking.
For She-Hulk (the title)? Do you not like these particular artists’ style (that’s fine) or do you not like “cartoony” superhero comics in general?
GrandmasterParticipant…I can’t stand the artwork. What’s worse, in #5 and #6 they did a surrealistic style completely pointless like the old MTV cartoon Aeon Flux that doesn’t fit a bit with anything.
That is artist Ron Wimberley.
Putting aside that you don’t like it (that’s fine) play editor and tell me where you think it would fit. (Please don’t just say “the trash bin”)!
:laugh:
Would it be another title? Another character? Another genre?
GrandmasterParticipantI think the reaction to Goyer’s comments was much ado about nothing. His (admittedly poorly-worded) attempt at being witty and snarky (read: entertaining) for a comic book-related podcast should have been taken with a grain of salt. (Sorry about all the aphorisms here, folks, bear with.) The real controversy here is that since he is a person working at the higher levels of mainstream Hollywood productions, his opinions/off-hand comments are given artificial value.
The “journalists” who glom on to every random thing that entertainment industry players say to create “news” know exactly what they’re doing—pursuing a career.
The hand-wringing over Goyer’s capacity to ruin the integrity of portrayals of women in genre movies because he said something icky is not what feminism is (was) about.
The subsequent proferring of Stan Lee’s opinion on the matter is laughable. Like he gives a shit.
July 13, 2014 at 10:09 pm in reply to: What Famous Fems would you add some serious muscle to if you could? #121471GrandmasterParticipantThere have been a lot of “morphs” in this thread that just use the liquify tool to add a blob of pixels to a woman’s arm and call that a “morph.”
I’m sorry, but as someone who spends hours agonizing over having the perfect hair line, skin shade, small details, and even photo grain.
It is disheartening to come into this thread and see muscle morphs that are just popped out in a few minutes. Separating an actress from a photo then using the liquify tool DOES NOT COUNT AS A MORPH!
Telling random people what kind of “art” to make really takes balls. :cheer:
GrandmasterParticipantI use to videotape the show in secret…
Why did it have to be in secret?
GrandmasterParticipantI tell ya, it must be sumthin’ in the water in Brazil
Miscegenation!
GrandmasterParticipantI’m liking everything, Lyman—the story pacing, the art for webstore buttons(!), and seeing Quadra in a new light with this fish-out-of-water origin story. Her superstition (the cometophobia—yes, I looked it up—is so quaint!
-
AuthorPosts